J Clin Med Res
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Letter to the Editor

Volume 11, Number 1, January 2019, pages 76-79


An Effective Insulin Therapy in Combination With Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors

Hidekatsu Yanaia, b, Hiroki Adachia, Mariko Hakoshimaa, Hisayuki Katsuyamaa

aDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine Kohnodai Hospital, Chiba, Japan
bCorresponding Author: Hidekatsu Yanai, Department of Internal Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine Kohnodai Hospital, 1-7-1 Kohnodai, Ichikawa, Chiba 272-8516, Japan

Manuscript submitted November 1, 2018, accepted November 13, 2018
Short title: Letter to the Editor
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3676

To the Editor▴Top 

Recently, Suzuki et al. reported the comparison of combined tofogliflozin (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, SGLT2i) and insulin glargine, tofogliflozin added to insulin, and insulin dose-increase therapy in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. [1]. In the tofogliflozin + insulin group, approximately 90% of patients were treated by mixed insulin or bolus + basal insulin. In the glargine + tofogliflozin group, only basal insulin was used. After 24 weeks, HbA1c significantly decreased in the groups using tofogliflozin than in insulin alone group, suggesting that the addition of SGLT2i to insulin is superior to insulin alone with regard to glycemic control. Reduction of HbA1c was non-significantly greater in the tofogliflozin + insulin group (-1.04%) than in the glargine + tofogliflozin group (-0.76%). However, reduction of daily insulin dose was significantly greater in the glargine + tofogliflozin group (-12.67 U) than in the tofogliflozin + insulin group (-2.56 U). Furthermore, body weight reduction was greater in the glargine + tofogliflozin group (-3.4 kg) than in the tofogliflozin + insulin group (-2.9 kg). In the report which studied effects of dapagliflozin on 24-h glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients by using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), the improvement of 24-h mean glucose was greater in the metformin group (-36.2 mg/dL) than in the insulin group (-11.9 mg/dL) [2]. The improvement in time in hyperglycemic range was also more pronounced in the metformin group (-15.3%) than in the insulin group (-8.9%). These recent studies let us think about an effective insulin therapy in combination with SGLT2i.

The meta-analyses showed that the addition of SGLT2i to insulin therapy significantly reduced fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, total daily insulin dose and body weight in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes [3, 4].

SGLT2i caused a decrease in the renal threshold for glucose excretion (RTG), and an increase in urinary glucose excretion and a reduction in plasma glucose levels in both health individuals and diabetic patients [5, 6]. Therefore, if plasma glucose levels were above RTG, SGLT2i was effective to decrease plasma glucose (Fig. 1a). However, if plasma glucose levels were below RTG, SGLT2i did not work to decrease plasma glucose (ineffective range of SGLT2i) (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. Ineffective range of SGLT2 inhibitors. The gray area indicates “ineffective range of SGLT2i” which shows that plasma glucose levels are below the renal threshold for glucose excretion (RTG). Solid and dotted lines indicate plasma glucose levels before and after the addition of SGLT2 inhibitors, respectively.

Studies which showed effects of the addition of SGLT2i to insulin therapy on insulin dose were shown in Table 1 [7-11]. Insulin reduced plasma glucose in a relatively dose-dependent manner in type 1 diabetic patients whose intrinsic insulin was depleted. However, SGLT2i reduced plasma glucose independently of insulin. Dose-dependent effects of SGLT2i on reduction of both bolus insulin and basal insulin were not observed in patients with type 1 diabetes [7, 8]. In type 1 diabetic patients treated with insulin and SGLT2i, glycemic control may be determined by administered insulin dose and RTG reduced by SGLT2i. Interestingly, the reduction in basal insulin dose was small in type 1 diabetic group showing a large reduction in bolus insulin dose [7, 8]. There was a tendency to show a negative correlation between changes in bolus insulin dose and basal insulin dose (Fig. 2), indicating that if bolus insulin dose was increased, basal insulin can be reduced and vice versa. When we treat type 1 diabetic patients, we should titrate bolus and basal insulin dose not to make plasma glucose below RTG (ineffective range of SGLT2i).

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Insulin Therapy in Combination With SGLT2 Inhibitors in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
 

Figure 2.
Click for large image
Figure 2. A correlation between changes in bolus insulin dose and changes in basal insulin dose by the addition of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 1 diabetes. Correlation was analyzed by Spearman’s correlation.

If patients who had the profile shown in Figure 3a took SGLT2i and showed a reduction in plasma glucose shown in Figure 3b, they can reduce both basal and bolus insulin doses like patients in the study by Matsumura et al [9]. If they show a reduction in plasma glucose as shown in Figure 3c, they can reduce only bolus insulin dose like patients in our previous study [10]. In type 2 diabetic patients whose intrinsic insulin was preserved, treated with insulin and SGLT2i, glycemic control may be determined by the following factors, 1) an improvement of insulin resistance due to body weight loss by SGLT2i; 2) an improvement of glucotoxicity by insulin and/or SGLT2i; 3) administered insulin dose; 4) RTG reduced by SGLT2i. If we can decrease plasma glucose to target plasma glucose levels by using basal insulin and SGLT2i and other oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) which can reduce postprandial glucose such as dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors and alpha glucosidase inhibitor, we can stop using bolus insulin like Figure 3d. Furthermore, SGLT2i was reported to reduce insulin dose in patients treated by using basal insulin and OADs [11]. As seen in the study by Suzuki et al [1], a larger reduction of insulin dose produced a greater decrease in body weight.

Figure 3.
Click for large image
Figure 3. The association among bolus and basal insulin dose, plasma glucose and the renal threshold for glucose excretion (RTG) in patients treated with insulin and SGLT2 inhibitors. Solid and dotted lines indicate plasma glucose levels before and after the addition of SGLT2 inhibitors, respectively.

Basal insulin therapy was less likely to induce hypoglycemia as compared with bolus-basal insulin therapy, suggesting that basal insulin therapy was less likely to produce “ineffective range of SGLT2i” as compared with bolus-basal insulin therapy. The addition of SGLT2i to basal insulin therapy showed a greater reduction in HbA1c (-1.03%), insulin dose (-1.58 U/day) and body weight (-1.64 kg) as compared with the addition of SGLT2i to bolus-basal insulin therapy (-0.39%, -1.33 U/day and -1.18 kg) [12], supporting our suggestion.

In conclusion, when we use insulin in addition to SGLT2i in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, we should titrate insulin dose not to make “ineffective range of SGLT2i”.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest concerning this article.


References▴Top 
  1. Suzuki K, Mitsuma Y, Sato T, Anraku T, Hatta M. Comparison of combined tofogliflozin and glargine, tofogliflozin added to insulin, and insulin dose-increase therapy in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. J Clin Med Res. 2016;8(11):805-814.
    doi pubmed
  2. Henry RR, Strange P, Zhou R, Pettus J, Shi L, Zhuplatov SB, Mansfield T, et al. Effects of dapagliflozin on 24-hour glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018;20(11):715-724.
    doi pubmed
  3. Yamada T, Shojima N, Noma H, Yamauchi T, Kadowaki T. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors as add-on therapy to insulin for type 1 diabetes mellitus: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(7):1755-1761.
    doi pubmed
  4. Tang H, Cui W, Li D, Wang T, Zhang J, Zhai S, Song Y. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in addition to insulin therapy for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(1):142-147.
    doi pubmed
  5. Sha S, Devineni D, Ghosh A, Polidori D, Chien S, Wexler D, Shalayda K, et al. Canagliflozin, a novel inhibitor of sodium glucose co-transporter 2, dose dependently reduces calculated renal threshold for glucose excretion and increases urinary glucose excretion in healthy subjects. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13(7):669-672.
    doi pubmed
  6. Devineni D, Morrow L, Hompesch M, Skee D, Vandebosch A, Murphy J, Ways K, et al. Canagliflozin improves glycaemic control over 28 days in subjects with type 2 diabetes not optimally controlled on insulin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14(6):539-545.
    doi pubmed
  7. Henry RR, Rosenstock J, Edelman S, Mudaliar S, Chalamandaris AG, Kasichayanula S, Bogle A, et al. Exploring the potential of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in type 1 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(3):412-419.
    doi pubmed
  8. Pieber TR, Famulla S, Eilbracht J, Cescutti J, Soleymanlou N, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, et al. Empagliflozin as adjunct to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes: a 4-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (EASE-1). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17(10):928-935.
    doi pubmed
  9. Matsumura M, Nakatani Y, Tanka S, Aoki C, Sagara M, Yanagi K, Suzuki K, et al. Efficacy of additional canagliflozin administration to type 2 diabetes patients receiving insulin therapy: examination of diurnal glycemic patterns using Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM). Diabetes Ther. 2017;8(4):821-827.
    doi pubmed
  10. Hakoshima M, Yanai H, Kakuta K, Adachi H. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Reduce Prandial Insulin Doses in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Treated With the Intensive Insulin Therapy. J Clin Med Res. 2018;10(6):493-498.
    doi pubmed
  11. Rosenstock J, Jelaska A, Zeller C, Kim G, Broedl UC, Woerle HJ, investigators E-RBt. Impact of empagliflozin added on to basal insulin in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin: a 78-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17(10):936-948.
    doi pubmed
  12. Terauchi Y, Tamura M, Senda M, Gunji R, Kaku K. Long-term safety and efficacy of tofogliflozin as add-on to insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes: Results from a 52-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, open-label extension, Phase 4 study in Japan (J-STEP/INS). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(5):1176-1185.
    doi pubmed


This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Clinical Medicine Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, monthly, ISSN 1918-3003 (print), 1918-3011 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jocmr.org   editorial contact: editor@jocmr.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.