J Clin Med Res
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 3, Number 3, June 2011, pages 106-110


In Vitro Activity of Carbapenems Alone and in Combination With Amikacin Against KPC-Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae

Jennifer Lea, b, e, Barbara McKeeb, Warunee Srisupha-Olarnc, d, David S. Burgessc, d

aUniversity of California, San Diego, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0714, La Jolla, CA 92093-0714, USA
bLong Beach Memorial Medical Center, 2801 Atlantic Ave, PO Box 1428, Long Beach, CA 90801-1428, USA
cCenter for Advancement of Research and Education in Infectious Diseases, University of Texas, College of Pharmacy, Austin, TX, USA
dPharmacotherapy Education and Research Center, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive- MSC 6220, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, USA
eCorresponding author: Jennifer Le, Email:

Manuscript accepted for publication April 28, 2011
Short title: Carbapenems and Amikacin Against KPC K. Pneumoniae
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jocmr551w

Abstract▴Top 

Background: Although carbapenems are the primary treatment strategy for invasive infections caused by ESBL bacteria, case reports of these pathogens with reduced carbapenem susceptibility have emerged. One potential treatment modality is to optimize the use of anti-infectives with combination therapy. We evaluated the activity of carbapenems alone and in combination with amikacin against these clinical isolates.

Methods: Time-kill studies evaluated ertapenem (ETP), imipenem (IPM), meropenem (MEM), and amikacin (AMK) against 4 non-duplicate clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae that were resistant to these antibiotics. Synergy was defined as ≥ 2 log10 decrease CFU/mL at 24 h for the combination when compared with the most active single agent of the combination, plus the number of surviving organisms for the antimicrobial combination was ≥ 2 log10 less than the initial inoculum.

Results: All isolates carried blaKPC-3 and genes encoding TEM-1 and SHV-11/-36; and were resistant to carbapenems (MIC at ≥ 8 μg/mL for ETP, MEM and IPM) and AMK (MIC 32 μg/mL) using broth microdilution. As monotherapy, none of the carbapenems nor AMK achieved and maintained bactericidal activity defined as ≥ 99.9% or > 3 log10 killing. From time-kill studies, synergy was demonstrated for MEM and IPM in combination with AMK over the entire 24 h against all isolates. In addition, MEM and IPM with AMK achieved and maintained bactericidal activity (≥ 99.9% killing) at 24 h against 2 and 1 isolate(s), respectively. Bactericidal activity and synergy were not observed for ETP combinations.

Conclusions: The combination of MEM or IPM with AMK displayed synergistic activity against KPC-3-producing K. pneumoniae isolates.

Keywords: ESBL; Klebsiella pneumoniae; KPC; Carbapenemase; Time-kill; Meropenem; Amikacin; Imipenem; Ertapenem; Carbapenem; Synergy

Introduction▴Top 

Carbapenems are the primary treatment strategy for serious infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. However, production of KPC β-lactamase, a serine carbapenemase primarily detected in K. pneumoniae, has emerged in the USA and is probably contributing to carbapenem resistance rates among Enterobacteriaceae [1, 2].

In light of this carbapenem resistance and with the dearth of new antimicrobial agents with novel mechanisms of action, combination therapy using existing antibiotics becomes an attractive option. The combination of two antibiotics from different classes will increase the probability that at least one antibiotic will provide adequate activity against the multi-drug resistance isolate and enhance their activity when synergy is present. This is crucial since inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy has been associated with increased mortality [3-5].

Based on limited clinical experience, susceptibility data and single antibiotic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies, polymixin B [6, 7], tigecycline [6-9], AMK [6], carbapenems [10-12], and clavulanic acid like ticarcillin/clavulanate [13] may play a role in combination therapy for infections caused by KPC-producing pathogens. We performed time-kill studies to evaluate the in vitro activity of carbapenems [including ertapenem (ETP), imipenem (IPM) and meropenem (MEM)] alone or in combination with amikacin (AMK) against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae. These antibiotics were selected due to their safety profile and feasibility to be used empirically since detection of KPC production in clinical laboratory can be challenging. In addition, amikacin has a fast rate of bactericidal activity [14] and post-antibiotic effect [15].

Materials and Methods▴Top 

Drug stock solutions were prepared according to the manufacturer’s recommendations from powders of ETP (AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE), IPM (Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ), MEM (AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE), and AMK (Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY). Drug concentrations were based on the mean steady-state serum concentration obtained using normal doses of each antibiotic in normal healthy volunteers. The following antibiotics at the specified concentrations (g/mL) were used: ETP 2, IPM 4, MEM 4, and AMK 16.

Four non-duplicate isolates of K. pneumoniae obtained from an observational clinical outcomes study carried blaKPC-3italic and genes encoding TEM-1 and SHV-11/-36 [16]. Isolate number 16, 17, 38 and 50 corresponded to the following patients 1, 2, 4 and 3, respectively. Isolates were negative for all other beta-lactamase encoding genes, including plasmidic AmpC, serine- and metallo-β-lactamases, tested. Molecular typing demonstrated that all 4 KPC-3-producing strains were clonally related.

Using broth microdilution as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), all strains were resistant to carbapenems (MIC at ≥ 8 μg/mL for ETP, MEM and IPM) and AMK (MIC 32 μg/mL). Likewise using E-tests, MIC values of all carbapenems were ≥ 32 μg/mL for all isolates and AMK were 128, 32, 48 and 48 μg/mL for C16, C17, C38 and C50, respectively.

Time-kill studies were performed using a final volume of 25 mL of cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth and an initial inoculum of ~ 1 x 106 CFU/mL. Samples were taken at 0, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h. Fifty μL was plated on trypticase soy agar plates using a spiral plater (Spiral Biotech, Bethesda, MD) and then incubated at 35 oC for 24 h before colony counts were determined using a laser colony counter (CASBA 4, Spiral Biotech, Bethesda, MD). The spiral plater controlled antibiotic carry-over [17]. Time-kill profiles were constructed (log CFU/mL versus time). The limit of quantification was 102 CFU/mL. Any colony count lower than this limit was rounded to 102 CFU/mL. All tests were performed in duplicate.

Results▴Top 

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Change in Colony Count (log1010 CFU/mL) at 24 Hours Compared to Initial Inoculums for KPC-3-Producing K. Pneumoniae Isolates Using Time-Kill Methodology
 

The mean starting inoculum for all of the time-kill experiments was 5.51 × 106 CFU/mL with an intra-day CV of < 7.0%. As monotherapy, none of the carbapenems nor AMK achieved and maintained bactericidal activity defined as ≥ 99.9% or > 3 log10 killing (Table 1). Maximum killing of ≥ 90% was observed for MEM and AMK against all isolates; and IPM against 3 isolates (except C17). ETP alone was least active as it did not achieve ≥ 90% killing in any isolates. Antibacterial activity was not maintained since significant regrowth was observed for all antibiotics after achieving 90% killing against each of the isolates (Fig. 1). In particular, amikacin demonstrated regrowth after 8 hrs.

Figure 1..
Click for large image
Figure 1.. Time-kill studies of carbapenems and amikacin alone and in combination against four KPC-3-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. GC: Growth control; AMK: amikacin; ETP: ertapenem; IPM: imipenem; MEM: meropenem.

Time-kill curve results for each carbapenem in combination with AMK are depicted in Figure 1. Synergy was defined as ≥ 2 log10 decrease CFU/mL at 24 h for the combination when compared with the most active single agent of the combination, plus the number of surviving organisms for the antimicrobial combination was ≥ 2 log10 less than the initial inoculum. Synergy was demonstrated for MEM and IPM in combination with AMK over the entire 24 h against all isolates. In addition, MEM and IPM with AMK achieved and maintained bactericidal activity (≥ 99.9% killing) at 24 h against 2 isolates (C38 and C50) and 1 (C50), respectively. For these isolates C38 and C50, the time to bactericidal activity were 12 h for MEM plus AMK and 24 and 8 h, respectively, for IPM plus AMK.

Bactericidal activity and synergy were not observed for ETP combinations. In addition, significant regrowth for ETP with AMK was evident for all isolates between 8 and 12 h. Slight regrowth occurred in 1 isolate (C16) for MEM and 3 isolates (except C50) for IPM combinations at 24 h. None of the antibiotic combinations demonstrated antagonism, which was defined as ≥ 2 log10 increase in colony count at 24 h for the combination when compared with the most active single agent of the combination.

Discussion▴Top 

The clinical utility of carbapenem monotherapy is limited against isolates that produce KPC carbapenemases [13]. Studies of prolonged infusion of high-dose regimens of beta-lactams, particularly meropenem at 2 g every 8 hours over 3-hours, against KPC isolates have produced conflicting results [18, 19]. Although rapid colony reduction was initially observed, regrowth occurred after 6 hr of meropenem exposure. Furthermore, meropenem exposure (or the percent time of free drug concentration above the MIC) for KPC isolates with elevated MICs of 8 and 16 μg/mL was significantly reduced due to rapid in vitro hydrolysis [19].

In light of the emerging resistance to carbapenems and the limited utility of overcoming this resistance through prolonged infusion of high-dose carbapenem monotherapy, combination therapy may play a role in the treatment of infections associated with KPC production since it may provide the potential for synergistic effects between two different classes of anti-infectives [20]. Studies evaluating antibiotic combinations against KPC-harboring isolates are limited. In our study, MEM or IPM in combination with AMK displayed synergy against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae. In another study, synergy was observed in combinations of polymyxin B with rifampin, doxycycline or tigecycline [7, 21].

Conclusion

The addition of AMK to carbapenems, particularly MEM and IPM, provided synergistic effects and enhanced bactericidal activity against K. pneumoniae with reduced susceptibility to carbapenems. Prolonged infusion of a high-dose carbapenem in combination with other potentially active antibiotics (such as AMK, tigecycline, and polymyxin B) may be a therapeutic option for serious infections associated with KPC production. Further investigation is warranted to determine if our in vitro observations translate into clinical efficacy. In addition, more research is imperative to optimize the dosing regimens of currently approved antibiotics using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic principles and to explore the potential role of novel chemical entities.

Acknowledgement and Transparency

This study was supported by a grant from the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Research Institute. This work was presented at the 50th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy on September 2010 in Boston, MA. The authors disclose no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article. Dr. Le has served as advisor/speaker and received research grants from Pfizer, Astellas and Cubist. Dr. Burgess has received research grants from AstraZenca, Ortho-McNeil, and Wyeth and served as advisor/speaker for Astellas, Forrest, and Wyeth.


References▴Top 
  1. Kitchel B, Rasheed JK, Patel JB, Srinivasan A, Navon-Venezia S, Carmeli Y, Brolund A, et al. Molecular epidemiology of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in the United States: clonal expansion of multilocus sequence type 258. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(8):3365-3370.
    pubmed
  2. Rhomberg PR, Jones RN. Summary trends for the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection Program: a 10-year experience in the United States (1999-2008). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;65(4):414-426.
    pubmed
  3. Cordery RJ, Roberts CH, Cooper SJ, Bellinghan G, Shetty N. Evaluation of risk factors for the acquisition of bloodstream infections with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species in the intensive care unit; antibiotic management and clinical outcome. J Hosp Infect. 2008;68(2):108-115.
    pubmed
  4. Gulmez D, Woodford N, Palepou MF, Mushtaq S, Metan G, Yakupogullari Y, Kocagoz S, et al. Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from Turkey with OXA-48-like carbapenemases and outer membrane protein loss. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;31(6):523-526.
    pubmed
  5. Ktari S, Arlet G, Mnif B, Gautier V, Mahjoubi F, Ben Jmeaa M, Bouaziz M, et al. Emergence of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates producing VIM-4 metallo-beta-lactamase, CTX-M-15 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, and CMY-4 AmpC beta-lactamase in a Tunisian university hospital. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(12):4198-4201.
    pubmed
  6. Castanheira M, Sader HS, Deshpande LM, Fritsche TR, Jones RN. Antimicrobial activities of tigecycline and other broad-spectrum antimicrobials tested against serine carbapenemase- and metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(2):570-573.
    pubmed
  7. Bratu S, Tolaney P, Karumudi U, Quale J, Mooty M, Nichani S, Landman D. Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Brooklyn, NY: molecular epidemiology and in vitro activity of polymyxin B and other agents. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56(1):128-132.
    pubmed
  8. Zhanel GG, Baudry PJ, Tailor F, Cox L, Hoban DJ, Karlowsky JA. Determination of the pharmacodynamic activity of clinically achievable tigecycline serum concentrations against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, AmpC beta-lactamases and reduced susceptibility to carbapenems using an in vitro model. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;64(4):824-828.
    pubmed
  9. Nicasio AM, Crandon JL, Nicolau DP. In vivo pharmacodynamic profile of tigecycline against phenotypically diverse Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(7):2756-2761.
    pubmed
  10. Bulik CC, Nicolau DP. In vivo efficacy of simulated human dosing regimens of prolonged-infusion doripenem against carbapenemase- producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(10):4112-4115.
    pubmed
  11. Goossens H, Grabein B. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility data for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae from the MYSTIC Program in Europe and the United States (1997-2004). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005;53(4):257-264.
    pubmed
  12. Jones RN, Mendes C, Turner PJ, Masterton R. An overview of the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program: 1997-2004. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005;53(4):247-256.
    pubmed
  13. Deshpande LM, Rhomberg PR, Sader HS, Jones RN. Emergence of serine carbapenemases (KPC and SME) among clinical strains of Enterobacteriaceae isolated in the United States Medical Centers: report from the MYSTIC Program (1999-2005). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;56(4):367-372.
    pubmed
  14. Pattharachayakul S, Neuhauser MM, Quinn JP, Pendland SL. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: activity of single versus combination agents. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51(3):737-739.
    pubmed
  15. Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Grecka P, Giamarellou H. Comparative in vitro interactions of ceftazidime, meropenem, and imipenem with amikacin on multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997;29(2):81-86.
    pubmed
  16. Le J, Castanheira M, Burgess DS, McKee B, Iqbal R, Jones RN. Clonal dissemination of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase KPC-3 in Long Beach, California. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(2):623-625.
    pubmed
  17. Yourassowsky E, Van der Linden MP, Crokaert F, Glupczynski Y. Effect of antibiotics carry-over on bacterial counting by 'spiral plating'. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988;21(1):138-140.
    pubmed
  18. Crandon JL, Kuti JL, Jones RN, Nicolau DP. Comparison of 2002-2006 OPTAMA programs for US hospitals: focus on gram-negative resistance. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43(2):220-227.
    pubmed
  19. Bulik CC, Christensen H, Li P, Sutherland CA, Nicolau DP, Kuti JL. Comparison of the activity of a human simulated, high-dose, prolonged infusion of meropenem against Klebsiella pneumoniae producing the KPC carbapenemase versus that against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(2):804-810.
    pubmed
  20. Eliopoulos GaMRJ. Antimicrobial Combinations. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
  21. Elemam A, Rahimian J, Doymaz M. In vitro evaluation of antibiotic synergy for polymyxin B-resistant carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(10):3558-3562.
    pubmed


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Clinical Medicine Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, monthly, ISSN 1918-3003 (print), 1918-3011 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jocmr.org   editorial contact: editor@jocmr.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.