Journals | Policy | Permission

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Case Report

Volume 3, Number 1, February 2011, pages 47-51

Talactoferrin Immunotherapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Series of Four Long-Term Survivors

While radical nephrectomy offers the chance for cure in localized renal cell carcinoma, improving treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma remains a hotly pursued goal in clinical research. The predominant clear cell subtype of this malignancy is discouragingly resistant to chemotherapy [1]. Sharpened understanding of tumor neovascularity and dysregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) [2] has led to promising results with therapies that target downstream vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [3, 4]. However, even with increasing focus on antiangiogenic agents, efforts continue to develop effective and tolerable immunotherapy. The historical experience with interleukin-2 has shown clinical efficacy at high doses but its toxicity profile can limit the length and intensity of its use [5]. Ideally, newer immunotherapeutic strategies will provide effective antitumor responses without incurring as many side effects as IL-2.

Talactoferrin alfa (talactoferrin; TLF), a novel immunomodulatory agent, is a recombinant human lactoferrin (rhLF) purified from Aspergillus. Lactoferrin, an iron-binding glycoprotein, can be found throughout the body, first identified in breast milk [6] but also present in nasolacrimal secretions, bronchial and cervico-vaginal mucus, and inside the granules of phagocytes [7]. As a trigger for immunomodulation at the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) [8], and as a dendritic cell maturation agent [9, 10] lactoferrin possesses many potentially useful pharmacologic functions, including anti-tumor activity. Talactoferrin has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in multiple animal models of solid tumors [11]. A dose-escalation trial with expansion at the optimal dose has already been conducted at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Houston, Texas to investigate the safety, tolerability, and anti-tumor activity of oral talactoferrin in metastatic solid tumors, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [12].

In a phase IB trial [13] and a follow-on phase II study [14], 16 patients with metastatic RCC, all with documented tumor progression during the 9 months prior to enrollment, were treated at our institution with single-agent oral talactoferrin. Patients received oral rhLF in amounts of 4.5 grams or 9 grams per day administered in two divided doses. The drug was given in 14-day cycles interrupted by a 14-day rest interval, until evidence of toxicity or disease progression. One patient switched from the 4.5-gram dosage to the 9-gram dosage due to progression on the lower dose. Patients were requested to maintain a diary documenting consumption of the study drug and any side effects they experienced. Toxicities were graded according to National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria [15]. Prior to entering he study, all patients had a complete history and physical examination, complete blood cell count, serum chemistries and electrolytes, and radiologic assessment of the measurable tumor mass. Subsequently, a research nurse and physician saw patients at regularly scheduled outpatient clinic visits. Complete blood count, serum electrolytes and chemistries were obtained at each visit. Tumor size progression was monitored through serial radiologic studies, performed at baseline, at 2 months, and approximately every 8 weeks thereafter. Target lesions were selected prospectively (prior to start of therapy) and followed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) [16].

We report a case series of the longest-term survivors from these two trials, all with progression-free survival exceeding 30 months.

These four patients' clinical courses are synopsized in the following brief narratives and additional information, including age and MSKCC risk score from time of post-nephrectomy recurrence [17], can be found in Table 1.

Click to view

Table 1. Additional Patients' Information

This patient underwent left radical nephrectomy in 1992 for grade II clear cell renal cell carcinoma with extension in the perinephric fat but no vascular invasion, no metastases to lymph nodes, and no positive surgical margins. In July 2004, he was found to have a heterogenous soft tissue mass in the right paratracheal area, extending to the right hilum, along with scattered lung nodules; biopsy during mediastinoscopy confirmed metastatic clear cell RCC. He was deemed to have unresectable disease and was enrolled in our talactoferrin trial. He began the 4.5 gm arm of the study in November 2004, at which time he was 66 years old. He developed progressive disease in June 2005 after his lesions grew 24% from baseline. In October 2005, he crossed over to the 9 gm arm of the study and his disease remained stable by RECIST criteria for 35 months until September 2008, when he developed a lytic lesion in his left femur. At this point his participation in the study ended and he was switched to sunitinib with focal radiotherapy for his bone lesion. He eventually underwent hip replacement due to progression of the bony disease. Subsequent treatments have included sorafenib, everolimus, and pazopanib.

This patient underwent left nephrectomy in 1995 for localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma. In December 2002, he was diagnosed with recurrent disease in the left renal surgical bed and with metastases to both lungs. After receiving IL-2 and interferon-α at another facility from February through June 2003, he initiated care at our hospital in September 2003, at which time he was continued on interferon-α. CT scans in March 2005 showed progressive disease and he was enrolled in the talactoferrin trial in June 2005. He remains on study, with progression-free survival not yet reached at 50 months. He remained on study until August 2009, when CT scans documented cancer progression. He received gamma knife treatment for a brain metastasis and systemic treatment with sunitinib followed by everolimus.

The patient underwent left nephrectomy in 1995 for an 18 cm clear cell/spindle cell renal cell carcinoma that invaded the capsule and extended into perinephric fat. In 1998 he developed left flank pain and was found to have biopsy-confirmed recurrent disease in the left renal surgical bed, as well as subcentimeter nodules in both lung bases. The patient was treated with IL-2 and interferon-α from 1998 to 1999 without response, then participated in an experimental methionine restriction diet from 1999 to 2000, during which he experienced disease progression. He was enrolled in the talactoferrin trial from July 2003 to June 2006 with stable disease. In June 2006, after 35 months of progression-free survival, he had disease progression and was changed to erlotinib plus bevacizumab. He did not tolerate sunitinib and was subsequently treated with sorafenib, temsirolimus, and then pazopanib.

Click for large image

Figure 1.. The regression of the tumor size (longest diameters) during the first 17 months of therapy in case 4.

This patient underwent nephrectomy in 2002 for renal cell carcinoma. Lung metastases were diagnosed 6 weeks post-operatively and the patient was treated with capecitabine, interferon-α, gemcitabine, and thalidomide. After initial improvement, he progressed and entered the talactoferrin trial in August 2003. He had a partial response and then remained stable by RECIST criteria until July 2006. His tumor regression during the first 17 months of therapy is summarized graphically in Figure 1. Serial CT scans, seen in Figure 2, show the reduction in size of his pulmonary metastases. The patients cancer later progressed in the mediastinum and brain, and he expired in September, 2006.

Click for large image

Figure 2.. CT scans showing the reduction in size of the pulmonary metastases in case 4.

These four promising examples must be interpreted within the appropriate context. First of all, these cases were selected for presentation from a larger pool of trial patients precisely because their progression-free survival was so encouraging. Secondly, their pre-study risk stratification, based upon time to post-nephrectomy recurrence, performance status, and lack of anemia, hypercalcemia, or elevated LDH, was uniformly low, although they had clearly documented tumor progression at the time of trial enrollment. Third, arrested tumor growth can occur as a part of the natural history of metastatic RCC. Under Gompertzian models, such time-dependent slowing occurs as the tumor growth curve reaches its plateau. As such, renal cell carcinomas under surveillance but not treatment can demonstrate a rate of volumetric expansion that diminishes with increasing size [18]. Nonetheless, in the three-pronged attack on renal cell carcinoma from the avenues of cell biology, angiogenesis, and immunology, well-tolerated immunomodulatory agents have been elusive. We suggest that the progression-free survivals of these patients merit further evaluation of oral talactoferrin to determine its true anti-neoplastic efficacy.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Dr. Atul Varadhachary and Agennix, Inc. for the provision of talactoferrin to research subjects.

Consents

Written informed consent was obtained from each patient for the educational use of his or her de-identified clinical information. Copies of the consents are available for review.

Competing Interests

Dr. Lewis has no competing interests to disclose. Dr. Hayes has received research support and consulting fees from Agennix, Inc.

Authors' Contributions

TH was responsible for study design and data analysis. ML assisted with data analysis and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

1. Yagoda A, Abi-Rached B, Petrylak D. Chemotherapy for advanced renal-cell carcinoma: 1983-1993. Semin Oncol. 1995;22(1):42-60.
   pubmed
2. Kaelin WG Jr.. The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene and kidney cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(18 Pt 2):6290S-6295S.
   pubmed
3. Seront E, Machiels JP. Targeted therapies in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov. 2009;4(2):146-156.
   pubmed
4. Yang JC, Haworth L, Sherry RM, Hwu P, Schwartzentruber DJ, Topalian SL, Steinberg SM, et al. A randomized trial of bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, for metastatic renal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(5):427-434.
   pubmed
5. McDermott DF, Atkins MB. Immunotherapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer J. 2008;14(5):320-324.
   pubmed
6. Kanyshkova TG, Buneva VN, Nevinsky GA. Lactoferrin and its biological functions. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2001;66(1):1-7.
   pubmed
7. Ward PP, Paz E, Conneely OM. Multifunctional roles of lactoferrin: a critical overview. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005;62(22):2540-2548.
   pubmed
8. Varadhachary A, Wolf JS, Petrak K, O'Malley BW Jr., Spadaro M, Curcio C, Forni G, et al. Oral lactoferrin inhibits growth of established tumors and potentiates conventional chemotherapy. Int J Cancer. 2004;111(3):398-403.
   pubmed
9. Spadaro M, Caorsi C, Ceruti P, Varadhachary A, Forni G, Pericle F, Giovarelli M. Lactoferrin, a major defense protein of innate immunity, is a novel maturation factor for human dendritic cells. FASEB J. 2008;22(8):2747-2757.
   pubmed
10. de la Rosa G, Yang D, Tewary P, Varadhachary A, Oppenheim JJ. Lactoferrin acts as an alarmin to promote the recruitment and activation of APCs and antigen-specific immune responses. J Immunol. 2008;180(10):6868-6876.
    pubmed
11. Wolf JS, Li G, Varadhachary A, Petrak K, Schneyer M, Li D, Ongkasuwan J, et al. Oral lactoferrin results in T cell-dependent tumor inhibition of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(5):1601-1610.
    pubmed
12. Hayes TG, Falchook GF, Varadhachary GR, Smith DP, Davis LD, Dhingra HM, Hayes BP, et al. Phase I trial of oral talactoferrin alfa in refractory solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2006;24(3):233-240.
    pubmed
13. Hayes TG, Falchook GS, Varadhachary A. Phase IB trial of oral talactoferrin in the treatment of patients with metastatic solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 2010;28(2):156-162.
    pubmed
14. Jonasch E, Stadler WM, Bukowski RM, Hayes TG, Varadhachary A, Malik R, Figlin RA, et al. Phase 2 trial of talactoferrin in previously treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2008;113(1):72-77.
    pubmed
15. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE).
16. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):205-216.
    pubmed
17. Eggener SE, Yossepowitch O, Pettus JA, Snyder ME, Motzer RJ, Russo P. Renal cell carcinoma recurrence after nephrectomy for localized disease: predicting survival from time of recurrence. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(19):3101-3106.
    pubmed
18. Crispen PL, Viterbo R, Boorjian SA, Greenberg RE, Chen DY, Uzzo RG. Natural history, growth kinetics, and outcomes of untreated clinically localized renal tumors under active surveillance. Cancer. 2009;115(13):2844-2852.
    pubmed

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.