J Clin Med Res
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.jocmr.org

Letter to the Editor

Volume 15, Number 6, June 2023, pages 340-342


Low Accuracy of Antenatal Screening for Group B Streptococcus From Perianal Area

Shunji Suzuki

Department of Obstetrics, Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo 124-0012, Japan

Manuscript submitted May 22, 2023, accepted June 23, 2023, published online June 29, 2023
Short title: Antenatal Screening for GBS
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4927

To the Editor▴Top 

Group B streptococcus (GBS) is recognized as the most frequent cause of severe early-onset infection in newborn infants. GBS has been observed to be present in the bowel flora of 17.4% of adults (colonization) including pregnant women, and those who are colonized are called “carriers” [1]. To date, more than half of early-onset GBS disease has been reported to occur in neonates born to women with negative GBS screening tests [2, 3]. For example, the recent article in Japan by Miyata et al [2] has also concerned that early-onset GBS disease can develop in infants who are born to mothers with negative GBS screening results. The timing of GBS screening at 35 - 37 weeks recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [4] and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) [5] was established based on an earlier study by Yancey et al [6], which indicated that the accuracy of late antenatal anogenital cultures in predicting GBS colonization at delivery is high in cultures collected at 1 - 5 weeks before delivery. In their observation, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of GBS cultures at 1 - 5 weeks before delivery for identifying colonization status at delivery were 87%, 96%, 87%, and 96%, respectively. While they were only 43%, 85%, 50%, and 81%, respectively among patients cultured 6 or more weeks before delivery. In their observation [6], a swab for culture specimen was inserted through the anal sphincter; however, the vaginal-perianal collection method has been indicated to be less painful and comfortable [7]. In some recent examinations [7-9], the detection rates of GBS culture from the (vaginal-) perianal area have been observed to be similar to that of anorectal specimens; however, the accuracy of antenatal screening for GBS with cultures from the perianal area has not been well examined.

The protocol for this prospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Japanese Red Cross Katsushika Maternity Hospital (K2007-15). Informed consent concerning analysis was obtained from all subjects.

We performed maternal GBS culture from perianal area used non-selective enrichment medium in 93 Japanese pregnant women scheduled vaginal delivery with GBS-positive at 35 weeks’ gestation every week until delivery. Of these, 84 (90%) delivered at ≤ 40 weeks’ gestation (within 5 weeks). The clinical characteristics of the 84 women are shown in Table 1. All women received the administration of ampicillin intravenous (IV) during labor or after premature membrane rupture. Fortunately, there were no cases of neonatal infection as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Clinical Characteristics of 84 Pregnant Japanese Women Scheduled Vaginal Delivery With Group B Streptococcus (GBS)-Positive at 35 Weeks’ Gestation
 

At 36 weeks’ gestation, 62 of these were defined as GBS-positive (positive predictive value: 74%), while 22 (26%) were negative. At 37 weeks’ gestation, the different results from those of the previous week (36 weeks’ gestation) were defined in 29 (15 + 14: 35%) women as shown in Figure 1. At the last perinatal visits, GBS-positive was defined in only 60 women (71%).


Click for large image
Figure 1. Maternal group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization at 36 and 37 weeks’ gestation and last prenatal visits before delivery at ≤ 40 weeks’ gestation in 84 pregnant women with GBS-positive at 35 weeks’ gestation.

In this study, the reproducibility rate of GBS-positive at perianal area within 5 weeks was only 71-74%. It seemed to be lower than that at anorectal area (inner part of anal sphincter) (87%) as previously reported [6].

Although the detection rates of GBS culture from perianal area may be similar to that from anorectal area [7-9]; however, the accuracy of antenatal screening for GBS with cultures from the perianal area may be inferior to that from anorectal area. The low accuracy in GBS colonization cultured from perianal area may be influenced by the status of defecation and rear cleaning. There may also be the influence of urination and shower bath before examination. On the other hand, there may be women diagnosed as GBS-negative accidentally at 35 weeks’ gestation. We understand that the use of non-selective medium is one of the limitations in this study, because GBS selectivity may be reduced by the overgrowth of other bacterial species other than GBS during the culture process [10]. However, if a priority is given to the comfort of pregnant women, further studies such as real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for predicting colonization of GBS at labor may be needed [11]. Otherwise, a further large prospective study may be needed to compare the accuracy of both specimens to deny the necessity of anorectal culture of GBS.

In conclusion, the accuracy of antenatal screening for GBS with cultures from the perianal area may be lower than that from anorectal area.

Acknowledgments

None to declare.

Financial Disclosure

None to declare.

Conflict of Interest

None to declare.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained.

Author Contributions

SS designed the report, collected the data, and wrote and reviewed the manuscript.

Data Availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


References▴Top 
  1. Shiraishi T, Suzuki S. Current prevalence of group B streptococcus colonization in pregnant women at a Japanese perinatal center. Clin Infect Immun. 2020;5:14-15.
  2. Miyata A, Takahashi H, Kubo T, Watanabe N, Tsukamoto K, Ito Y, Sago H. Early-onset group B streptococcal disease following culture-based screening in Japan: a single center study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012;38(8):1052-1056.
    doi pubmed
  3. Puopolo KM, Madoff LC, Eichenwald EC. Early-onset group B streptococcal disease in the era of maternal screening. Pediatrics. 2005;115(5):1240-1246.
    doi pubmed
  4. Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease: a public health perspective. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1996;45(RR-7):1-24.
    pubmed
  5. ACOG committee opinion. Prevention of early-onset group B streptococcal disease in newborns. Number 173—June 1996. Committee on Obstetric Practice. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1996;54(2):197-205.
    pubmed
  6. Yancey MK, Schuchat A, Brown LK, Ventura VL, Markenson GR. The accuracy of late antenatal screening cultures in predicting genital group B streptococcal colonization at delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88(5):811-815.
    doi pubmed
  7. Trappe KL, Shaffer LET, Stempel LE. Vaginal-perianal compared with vaginal-rectal cultures for detecting group B streptococci during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 Pt 1):313-317.
    doi pubmed
  8. Jamie WE, Edwards RK, Duff P. Vaginal-perianal compared with vaginal-rectal cultures for identification of group B streptococci. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(5 Pt 1):1058-1061.
    doi pubmed
  9. Orafu C, Gill P, Nelson K, Hecht B, Hopkins M. Perianal versus anorectal specimens: is there a difference in Group B streptococcal detection? Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(6):1036-1039.
    doi pubmed
  10. Ohnishi M, Lee ST, Ui K, Koizumi A, Tomimoto K, Yabuuchi H, Tanaka S, et al. Selective separation and enrichment media for Group B Streptococcus (GBS) screening of pregnant women: Evaluation of the GBS selectivity of three commercial media sets by coculturing bacterial species other than GBS. Jpn J Med Tech. 2017;66:33-39.
  11. Gouvea MIS, Joao EC, Teixeira MLB, Read JS, Fracalanzza SEL, Souza CTV, Souza MJ, et al. Accuracy of a rapid real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for diagnosis of group B Streptococcus colonization in a cohort of HIV-infected pregnant women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(9):1096-1101.
    doi pubmed


This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Clinical Medicine Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, monthly, ISSN 1918-3003 (print), 1918-3011 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jocmr.org   editorial contact: editor@jocmr.org     elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.