J Clin Med Res
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 10, Number 12, December 2018, pages 883-890


Clinical Usefulness of the Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index as a Predictor of Primary Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Takashi Hitsumoto

Hitsumoto Medical Clinic, 2-7-7, Takezakicyou, Shimonoseki City, Yamaguchi, 750-0025, Japan

Manuscript submitted September 20, 2018, accepted October 12, 2018
Short title: CAVI and Primary Cardiovascular Events in CKD
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3631

Abstract▴Top 

Background: The cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) is a physiologic marker reflecting arterial function. There have been no prospective studies investigating the relationship between CAVI and cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this prospective study was to assess the clinical usefulness of CAVI as a predictor of primary cardiovascular events in patients with CKD.

Methods: The study enrolled 460 outpatients with CKD but no history of cardiovascular disease (152 men and 308 women; mean ± standard deviation age, 74 ± 12 years). Patients were assigned to one of three groups: low (L, CAVI < 9; n = 100), medium (M, CAVI 9 - 10; n = 199), or high (H, CAVI > 10; n = 161). The utility of the CAVI as a predictor of primary cardiovascular events was evaluated.

Results: During the follow-up period (median 60.1 months), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 91 cases (L, 8 (8.0%); M, 31 (15.6%); H, 52 (32.3%); P < 0.001, log-rank test). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, the risk for a MACE was significantly higher in group H than in non-group H (hazard ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.31 - 3.02; P < 0.01). A CAVI cut-off of 9.7 yielded the largest area under the curve, 0.701 (95% confidence interval: 0.657 - 0.743, P < 0.001), indicating a sensitivity of 74.0% and a specificity of 59.6% for discriminating between those who did and did not experience a MACE during follow-up.

Conclusions: The results of this study showed that a high CAVI is a predictor of primary cardiovascular events in patients with CKD.

Keywords: Cardio-ankle vascular index; Chronic kidney disease; Primary cardiovascular events; Oxidative stress; Advanced glycation end products; Renin-angiotensin system inhibitor

Introduction▴Top 

In recent years, the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has increased because of both life-extending treatment and the increased incidence of life style-related disease such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia [1, 2]. CKD is an important risk factor not only for end-stage renal disease but also for cardiovascular disease (CVD) [3, 4]. Complications of CVD in patients with CKD are associated with a poor prognosis [5, 6]. Therefore, for patients with CKD, it is crucial to be alert to risk factors for cardiovascular events and to consider treatment to prevent them.

Arterial dysfunction is an important risk factor for cardiovascular events. Among physiologic markers of arterial function, the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) is a novel marker of atherosclerosis that reflects systemic arterial stiffness in vessels such as the aorta and the femoral and tibial arteries [7]. This stiffness parameter is reported to be independent of the blood pressure during measurement. In addition, CAVI is thought to reflect endothelial function [8, 9]. Several clinical studies have indicated the clinical significance of CAVI in relation to CKD [10-12]. However, there has been no prospective study of the relationship between CAVI and cardiovascular events in patients with CKD. Therefore, this study was designed to clarify the clinical usefulness of CAVI as a predictor of primary cardiovascular events in patients with CKD.

Materials and Methods▴Top 

Participants

Between June 2011 and December 2013, 460 outpatients (152 men (33.0%) and 308 women (67.0%)) with CKD but no history of cardiovascular events were prospectively enrolled at the Hitsumoto Medical Clinic, Yamaguchi, Japan. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the adjusted Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation, as proposed by the working group of the Japanese Chronic Kidney Disease Initiative [13]. The definition of CKD for selection of participants was an eGFR from 15 to 59 mL/min/1.73m2. The mean age (± standard deviation) was 74 ± 12 years. CAVI was measured as described below, after which the participants were assigned to one of three groups, those with a low (L, < 9; n = 100), medium (M, = 9 - 10; n = 199), or high (H, > 10; n = 161) CAVI. Cut-off levels of CAVI were determined by previous studies [14]. The study protocol was approved by Local Ethics Committee of Hitsumoto Medical Clinic, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Measurement of CAVI

The CAVI was measured using a commercial device (Vasera; Fukuda Denshi, Tokyo, Japan) according to previously described methods [7]. Briefly, the brachial and ankle pulse waves were determined using inflatable cuffs with the pressure maintained between 30 and 50 mm Hg to ensure that the cuff pressure had a minimal effect on the systemic hemodynamics. Blood and pulse pressures were determined simultaneously with the subjects lying supine, after they had first rested for 10 min in a quiet room. The CAVI recorded for the study was the mean of the left and right values. CAVI was calculated using the following formula: CAVI = a {(2ρ/ΔP) × ln (Ps/Pd) PWV2} + b, where a and b are constants, ρ is blood density, ΔP is Ps - Pd, Ps is systolic blood pressure, Pd is diastolic blood pressure, and PWV is pulse wave velocity.

Evaluation of clinical parameters

Body mass index was calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters. Obesity was defined by the Japanese criteria of body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2. Current smoking was defined as smoking at least one cigarette per day during the previous 28 days. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg, or the use of antihypertensive medication. Dyslipidemia was defined as a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level ≥ 140 mg/dL, a high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level ≤ 40 mg/dL, a triglyceride level ≥ 150 mg/dL, or the use of antidyslipidemic medication. Diabetes mellitus was defined as a fasting blood glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL or the use of antidiabetic medication. Skin autofluorescence (AF) reflects pentosidine, a major component of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in tissues. It was measured using a commercial device (AGE Reader; DiagnOptics, Groningen, Netherlands), as previously described [15]. AF was defined as the average light intensity per nanometer between 300 nm and 420 nm. Skin AF levels were expressed in arbitrary units. The following blood or urine parameters were measured: serum lipid concentrations, plasma glucose concentrations, derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs), and urinary albumin concentrations. Blood samples were collected from the antecubital vein in the morning after 12 h of fasting, and urine samples were collected on the same day. Total cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were measured using standard enzymatic methods. High- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were measured using selective inhibition and Friedewald’s formula, respectively [16]. Participants with a serum triglyceride concentration ≥400 mg/dL were excluded from the analysis, given the limitations of this method. Glucose concentrations were measured by the glucose oxidase method. As a marker of oxidative stress in vivo [17], the d-ROMs test was performed using a commercial kit (Diacron, Grosseto, Italy). Urinary albumin concentration was measured using a commercial kit (Siemens/Bayer DCA 2000+ Analyzer, Siemens Healthineers, Tokyo, Japan).

Follow-up

The study follow-up period ended in May 2018. The endpoint was a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke and hospital admission for heart failure.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Stat View-J 5.0 (HULINKS, Tokyo, Japan) and MedCalc for Windows version 14.8.1 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used for comparisons among the three groups. Post-hoc testing was performed using Fisher’s protected least significant differences or the Mann-Whitney U-test with the Bonferroni correction. Event-free survival rate curves were plotted using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the differences between the curves were evaluated using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, and the Youden Index was used to determine the optimal cut-off for CAVI for predicting a MACE. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results▴Top 

Table 1 presents the characteristics of the participants at study entry, and the dot graph of CAVI is shown in Figure 1. The mean CAVI for groups L, M, and H was 8.4 (range; 7.5 - 8.9), 9.5 (range; 9.0 - 10.0), and 10.9 (range; 10.1 - 13.7), respectively. The eGFR level was significantly lower in group H than in group M or group L. The following factors were significantly higher in group H than in group M or L: fasting blood glucose levels, skin AF, d-ROMs, and urinary albumin concentrations. Figure 2 shows the Kaplan-Meier curve for the incidence of MACE. The median follow-up was 60.1 months (range, 2 - 84 months). During follow-up, 91 participants experienced at least one MACE (L, 8 cases (8.0%)); M, 31 cases (15.6%)); H, 52 cases (32.3%)). Group H had a significantly higher incidence of MACE compared with groups M and L (log-rank test, P < 0.001). Table 2 presents the clinical variables at study entry of all the participants, comparing those who experienced MACEs with those who did not. Age, current smoking status, prevalence of hypertension, systolic blood pressure, prevalence of diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentrations, skin AF, d-ROMs, and urinary albumin concentration were considerably higher in participants who had a MACE than in those who did not. The eGFR levels and use of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors or statins were considerably lower. Table 3 presents the results of the multivariate Cox regression analysis for the MACE. A total of 11 variables were significant factors for MACE on univariate analysis or in a check of multicollinearity among the variables. Of these 11, six variables (CAVI, a CAVI >10, diabetes mellitus, age, skin AF, d-ROMs, and RAS-inhibitor use) had a significant hazard ratio for MACE. Figure 3 shows the ROC curve analysis for the incidence of MACE based on CAVI. A cut-off value of 9.7 yielded the largest area under the curve, 0.701 (95% confidence interval: 0.657 - 0.743, P < 0.001). This indicated a sensitivity of 74.0% and specificity of 59.6% to discriminate between those who did and did not have a MACE during follow-up.

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Characteristics of Patients
 

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. The dot graph of CAVI. CAVI: cardio-ankle vascular index.

Figure 2.
Click for large image
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curve for the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events. The Kaplan-Meier curve confirmed that group H had a significantly higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with groups M and L (log-rank test, P < 0.001). *P < 0.001 vs. group L, **P = 0.112 vs. group L, #P < 0.001 vs. group M.

Table 2.
Click to view
Table 2. Clinical Parameters at Registration of Patients With and Without Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
 

Table 3.
Click to view
Table 3. Multivariate Cox Regression Analysis for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
 

Figure 3.
Click for large image
Figure 3. Prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events at follow-up period using CAVI. A cut-off value for CAVI of 9.7 yielded the largest area under the curve of 0.701 (95% confidence interval: 0.657 - 0.743, P < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 74.0% and specificity of 59.6% for discriminating between those who did and did not experience major adverse cardiovascular events during the follow-up period. CAVI: cardio-ankle vascular index.
Discussion▴Top 

Previous studies have indicated the association of aging, diabetes mellitus, and CVD with CKD [18, 19]. Consistent with these previous findings, this study confirmed these traditional CVD risk factors as independent predictors of a MACE. The results of the present study also found that a high CAVI was a predictor of a MACE in patients with CKD. In addition, the results of the d-ROMs test, as an in vivo marker of oxidative stress, and skin AF, as a marker of tissue AGEs, were also independent predictors of a MACE. These novel CVD risk factors were significantly associated with a high CAVI.

Several clinical studies have reported the relationship between arterial dysfunction, including increased arterial stiffness or endothelial dysfunction, and the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with CKD [20-22]. The results of the present study, demonstrating a significant association between CAVI and MACEs, imply that arterial dysfunction is an important target for prevention of primary cardiovascular events in patients with CKD. This study found that a CAVI > 10 was selected as an independent predictor of MACE among all the explanatory variables we analyzed. In addition, ROC curve analysis for the incidence of MACE indicated that a cut-off value for CAVI of 9.7 yielded the largest area under the curve (0.701) for discriminating between those who did and did not experience MACE. Previous studies reported that the CAVI could be improved by interventions such as lifestyle modification or medication [23-26]. The results of the present study suggest that aggressive intervention should be undertaken for patients with CKD whose CAVI is 10 or higher with a view to decreasing cardiovascular events. Deterioration of markers of kidney function such as eGFR or albuminuria is reported to be an important risk factor for cardiovascular events [4]. However, multivariate analysis in this study indicated that these renal function variables were not independently predictive of a MACE, even though they were significantly associated with such events on univariate analysis. However, eGFR and albuminuria were significantly associated with CAVI. Previous studies also indicated that an increase in the CAVI is closely associated with a decreased eGFR or increased albuminuria [10, 27]. Thus, these results can be interpreted that increase of CAVI in the background of decrease in eGFR or albuminuria of CKD patients acts crucial role in the incidence of CVD.

It is no doubt a fact that oxidative stress is an important factor in the pathogenesis of CVD. Various oxidative stress markers have been reported to be associated clinically with CVD, and several clinical studies have indicated the clinical usefulness of measuring d-ROMs as a risk factor for cardiovascular events [28-30]. The results of the present study also found that elevated d-ROM levels were a predictor of primary cardiovascular events in patients with CKD. This study found that higher d-ROM levels were associated with a high CAVI. Previous studies have reported that anti-oxidant medications result in a reduced CAVI [25, 31, 32]. Thus, findings of the present study again are consistent with the notion that oxidative stress increases cardiovascular events in patients with CKD, and this may be reflected in an elevated CAVI. This raises the possibility of reducing CAVI with anti-oxidant medication and, therefore, the incidence of primary cardiovascular events.

Recent basic and clinical studies have emphasized the important role played by AGEs in various diseases, such as the complications of diabetes, CKD, and CVD [33]. In addition, researchers have reported that increased skin AF is a cardiovascular risk factor [34-37]. The results of this study also indicate that a high skin AF is an independent predictor of primary cardiovascular events in patients with CKD. In addition, a high skin AF level had a significant positive correlation with CAVI, suggesting that accumulation of AGEs in arterial vessel walls contributes to arterial dysfunction in patients with CKD. Genevieve et al examined the relationship between skin AF and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, which reflect the preceding 1- to 2-month glucose levels [38]. They measured HbA1c levels every 6 months and found that the skin AF level was significantly related to the preceding five and 10 mean HbA1c levels. Isami et al reported that lifestyle habits such as physical activity, nonsmoking, adequate sleep, low mental stress level, eating breakfast, and abstaining from sugary foods were each independently associated with lower skin AF levels [39]. Thus, long-term glucose control and good life style habits are important to maintain lower skin AF levels and a lower CAVI.

It is well known that the RAS system is an important factor in the pathogenesis of both CKD and CVD. In fact, RAS inhibitors are clinically shown to suppress the progression of CKD and the incidence of CVD events [40, 41]. In addition, administration of RAS inhibitors has been shown to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with CKD [42, 43]. The results of this study also indicate that the use of RAS inhibitors was independently associated with fewer MACEs in patients with CKD. Several studies have in fact reported that RAS inhibition is effective in improving the CAVI [32, 44, 45]. Among patients of the present study, RAS inhibitors were used in 40% of patients in group H. Therefore, greater use of RAS inhibitors is required to improve arterial function in patients with a high CAVI, with the expectation that it will help reduce primary cardiovascular events in patients with CKD.

Limitations

This study had several limitations. First, it was conducted at a single center with a relatively small sample, so the findings cannot be generalized to all populations. Second, CAVI was measured only once at study entry. A further investigation of serial changes in CAVI in relation to primary cardiovascular events is needed. Finally, further studies of patients with a high CAVI are warranted to confirm whether interventions, such as lifestyle modification or medications, reduce the incidence of primary cardiovascular events in patients with CKD along with improvement in CAVI.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that CAVI is a predictor of primary cardiovascular events in patients with CKD. Further studies of patients with a high CAVI are warranted to confirm whether interventions, such as lifestyle modification or medications, reduce the incidence of primary cardiovascular events in patients with CKD along with improvement of the CAVI.

Conflict of Interest

Author has no conflict of interest.

Grant Support

None.


References▴Top 
  1. Yamagata K, Ishida K, Sairenchi T, Takahashi H, Ohba S, Shiigai T, Narita M, et al. Risk factors for chronic kidney disease in a community-based population: a 10-year follow-up study. Kidney Int. 2007;71(2):159-166.
    doi pubmed
  2. Kim KS, Park SW, Cho YW, Kim SK. Higher Prevalence and Progression Rate of Chronic Kidney Disease in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Metab J. 2018;42(3):224-232.
    doi pubmed
  3. Gansevoort RT, Matsushita K, van der Velde M, Astor BC, Woodward M, Levey AS, de Jong PE, et al. Lower estimated GFR and higher albuminuria are associated with adverse kidney outcomes. A collaborative meta-analysis of general and high-risk population cohorts. Kidney Int. 2011;80(1):93-104.
    doi pubmed
  4. Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium, Matsushita K, van der Velde M, Astor BC, Woodward M, Levey AS, de Jong PE, et al. Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9731):2073-2081.
    doi
  5. Nikolsky E, Mehran R, Turcot D, Aymong ED, Mintz GS, Lasic Z, Lansky AJ, et al. Impact of chronic kidney disease on prognosis of patients with diabetes mellitus treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94(3):300-305.
    doi pubmed
  6. Dan K, Miyoshi T, Nakahama M, Mizuno T, Kagawa K, Naito Y, Kawada S, et al. Impact of chronic kidney disease on cardiovascular and renal events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting stent: risk stratification with C-reactive protein. Cardiorenal Med. 2018;8(2):151-159.
    doi pubmed
  7. Shirai K, Utino J, Otsuka K, Takata M. A novel blood pressure-independent arterial wall stiffness parameter; cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). J Atheroscler Thromb. 2006;13(2):101-107.
    doi pubmed
  8. Endo K, Saiki A, Ohira M, Miyashita Y, Shirai K. Cardio-ankle vascular index may reflect endothelial function in type 2 diabetes. Int J Clin Pract. 2011;65(11):1200-1201.
    doi pubmed
  9. Kim KJ, Lee BW, Kim HM, Shin JY, Kang ES, Cha BS, Lee EJ, et al. Associations between cardio-ankle vascular index and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2011;18(4):328-336.
    doi pubmed
  10. Kubozono T, Miyata M, Ueyama K, Nagaki A, Hamasaki S, Kusano K, Kubozono O, et al. Association between arterial stiffness and estimated glomerular filtration rate in the Japanese general population. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2009;16(6):840-845.
    doi pubmed
  11. Namikoshi T, Fujimoto S, Yorimitsu D, Ihoriya C, Fujimoto Y, Komai N, Sasaki T, et al. Relationship between vascular function indexes, renal arteriolosclerosis, and renal clinical outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Nephrology (Carlton). 2015;20(9):585-590.
    doi pubmed
  12. Capusa C, Stefan G, Stancu S, Ilyes A, Dorobantu N, Mircescu G. Subclinical cardiovascular disease markers and vitamin D deficiency in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients. Arch Med Sci. 2016;12(5):1015-1022.
    doi pubmed
  13. Imai E, Horio M, Nitta K, Yamagata K, Iseki K, Hara S, Ura N, et al. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate by the MDRD study equation modified for Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2007;11(1):41-50.
    doi pubmed
  14. Kubota Y, Maebuchi D, Takei M, Inui Y, Sudo Y, Ikegami Y, Fuse J, et al. Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index is a predictor of cardiovascular events. Artery Res 2011;5(3):91-96.
    doi
  15. Meerwaldt R, Links TP, Graaff R, Hoogenberg K, Lefrandt JD, Baynes JW, Gans RO, et al. Increased accumulation of skin advanced glycation end-products precedes and correlates with clinical manifestation of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetologia. 2005;48(8):1637-1644.
    doi pubmed
  16. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18(6):499-502.
    pubmed
  17. Cesarone MR, Belcaro G, Carratelli M, Cornelli U, De Sanctis MT, Incandela L, Barsotti A, et al. A simple test to monitor oxidative stress. Int Angiol. 1999;18(2):127-130.
    pubmed
  18. Levey AS, de Jong PE, Coresh J, El Nahas M, Astor BC, Matsushita K, Gansevoort RT, et al. The definition, classification, and prognosis of chronic kidney disease: a KDIGO Controversies Conference report. Kidney Int. 2011;80(1):17-28.
    doi pubmed
  19. Bouchi R, Babazono T, Yoshida N, Nyumura I, Toya K, Hayashi T, Hanai K, et al. Association of albuminuria and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate with incident stroke and coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Hypertens Res. 2010;33(12):1298-1304.
    doi pubmed
  20. Sulemane S, Panoulas VF, Bratsas A, Grapsa J, Brown EA, Nihoyannopoulos P. Subclinical markers of cardiovascular disease predict adverse outcomes in chronic kidney disease patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;33(5):687-698.
    doi pubmed
  21. Chen J, Mohler ER, 3rd, Garimella PS, Hamm LL, Xie D, Kimmel S, Townsend RR, et al. Ankle brachial index and subsequent cardiovascular disease risk in patients with chronic kidney disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(6):e003339.
    doi
  22. Moody WE, Edwards NC, Madhani M, Chue CD, Steeds RP, Ferro CJ, Townend JN. Endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease in early-stage chronic kidney disease: cause or association? Atherosclerosis. 2012;223(1):86-94.
    doi pubmed
  23. Iwasa T, Amiya E, Ando J, Watanabe M, Murasawa T, Komuro I. Different Contributions of Physical Activity on Arterial Stiffness between Diabetics and Non-Diabetics. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160632.
    doi pubmed
  24. Nagayama D, Endo K, Ohira M, Yamaguchi T, Ban N, Kawana H, Nagumo A, et al. Effects of body weight reduction on cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). Obes Res Clin Pract. 2013;7(2):e139-e145.
    doi pubmed
  25. Miyashita Y, Endo K, Saiki A, Ban N, Yamaguchi T, Kawana H, Nagayama D, et al. Effects of pitavastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitor, on cardio-ankle vascular index in type 2 diabetic patients. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2009;16(5):539-545.
    doi pubmed
  26. Shirai K, Song M, Suzuki J, Kurosu T, Oyama T, Nagayama D, Miyashita Y, et al. Contradictory effects of beta1- and alpha1- aderenergic receptor blockers on cardio-ankle vascular stiffness index (CAVI)—CAVI independent of blood pressure. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2011;18(1):49-55.
    doi pubmed
  27. Liu J, Liu H, Zhao H, Shang G, Zhou Y, Li L, Wang H. Descriptive study of relationship between cardio-ankle vascular index and biomarkers in vascular-related diseases. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2017;39(5):468-472.
    doi pubmed
  28. Kotani K, Tsuzaki K, Taniguchi N, Sakane N. Correlation between reactive oxygen metabolites & atherosclerotic risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Indian J Med Res. 2013;137(4):742-748.
    pubmed
  29. Masaki N, Sato A, Horii S, Kimura T, Toya T, Yasuda R, Namba T, et al. Usefulness of the d-ROMs test for prediction of cardiovascular events. Int J Cardiol. 2016;222:226-232.
    doi pubmed
  30. Hitsumoto T. Efficacy of the reactive oxygen metabolite test as a predictor of initial heart failure hospitalization in elderly patients with chronic heart failure. Cardiol Res. 2018;9(3):153-160.
    doi pubmed
  31. Nagayama D, Saiki A, Endo K, Yamaguchi T, Ban N, Kawana H, Ohira M, et al. Improvement of cardio-ankle vascular index by glimepiride in type 2 diabetic patients. Int J Clin Pract. 2010;64(13):1796-1801.
    doi pubmed
  32. Miyashita Y, Saiki A, Endo K, Ban N, Yamaguchi T, Kawana H, Nagayama D, et al. Effects of olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, and amlodipine, a calcium channel blocker, on Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2009;16(5):621-626.
    doi pubmed
  33. Nenna A, Spadaccio C, Lusini M, Ulianich L, Chello M, Nappi F. Basic and Clinical Research Against Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs): New Compounds to Tackle Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetic Complications. Recent Adv Cardiovasc Drug Discov. 2015;10(1):10-33.
    doi pubmed
  34. den Dekker MA, Zwiers M, van den Heuvel ER, de Vos LC, Smit AJ, Zeebregts CJ, Oudkerk M, et al. Skin autofluorescence, a non-invasive marker for AGE accumulation, is associated with the degree of atherosclerosis. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83084.
    doi pubmed
  35. Hangai M, Takebe N, Honma H, Sasaki A, Chida A, Nakano R, Togashi H, et al. Association of advanced glycation end products with coronary artery calcification in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes as assessed by skin autofluorescence. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2016;23(10):1178-1187.
    doi pubmed
  36. Hitsumoto T. Clinical Significance of Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index as a Cardiovascular Risk Factor in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Med Res. 2018;10(4):330-336.
    doi pubmed
  37. Hitsumoto T. Clinical Significance of Skin Autofluorescence in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Chronic Heart Failure. Cardiol Res. 2018;9(2):83-89.
    doi pubmed
  38. Genevieve M, Vivot A, Gonzalez C, Raffaitin C, Barberger-Gateau P, Gin H, Rigalleau V. Skin autofluorescence is associated with past glycaemic control and complications in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab. 2013;39(4):349-354.
    doi pubmed
  39. Isami F, West BJ, Nakajima S, Yamagishi SI. Association of advanced glycation end products, evaluated by skin autofluorescence, with lifestyle habits in a general Japanese population. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(3):1043-1051.
    doi pubmed
  40. He YM, Feng L, Huo DM, Yang ZH, Liao YH. Enalapril versus losartan for adults with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrology (Carlton). 2013;18(9):605-614.
    doi pubmed
  41. Yamashita K, Kondo T, Muramatsu T, Matsushita K, Nagahiro T, Maeda K, Shintani S, et al. Effects of valsartan versus amlodipine in diabetic hypertensive patients with or without previous cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112(11):1750-1756.
    doi pubmed
  42. Holtkamp FA, de Zeeuw D, de Graeff PA, Laverman GD, Berl T, Remuzzi G, Packham D, et al. Albuminuria and blood pressure, independent targets for cardioprotective therapy in patients with diabetes and nephropathy: a post hoc analysis of the combined RENAAL and IDNT trials. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(12):1493-1499.
    doi pubmed
  43. Kim-Mitsuyama S, Soejima H, Yasuda O, Node K, Jinnouchi H, Yamamoto E, Sekigami T, et al. Cardiovascular and renal protective role of angiotensin blockade in hypertension with advanced CKD: a subgroup analysis of ATTEMPT-CVD randomized trial. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3150.
    doi pubmed
  44. Miyoshi T, Doi M, Hirohata S, Kamikawa S, Usui S, Ogawa H, Sakane K, et al. Olmesartan reduces arterial stiffness and serum adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein in hypertensive patients. Heart Vessels. 2011;26(4):408-413.
    doi pubmed
  45. Kinouchi K, Ichihara A, Sakoda M, Kurauchi-Mito A, Murohashi-Bokuda K, Itoh H. Effects of telmisartan on arterial stiffness assessed by the cardio-ankle vascular index in hypertensive patients. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2010;33(4):304-312.
    doi pubmed


This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Clinical Medicine Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, monthly, ISSN 1918-3003 (print), 1918-3011 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jocmr.org   editorial contact: editor@jocmr.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.