J Clin Med Res
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 8, Number 12, December 2016, pages 859-862


Clinical Impact of Blood Culture Results in Acutely Ill Hospitalized Adult Patients With Cystic Fibrosis

Robert J. Vendera, Robert L. Venderb, c

aPenn State College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
bDepartment of Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
cCorresponding Author: Robert L. Vender, Department of Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA

Manuscript accepted for publication September 27, 2016
Short title: Positive Blood Cultures in Cystic Fibrosis
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2764w

Abstract▴Top 

Background: Blood cultures are obtained clinically to confirm site and source of acute infection as well as to guide effective antibiotic therapies. Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are at risk for blood stream infection (BSI) as identified from positive blood culture results.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of 190 adult CF patients from January 1, 2001 through December 1, 2015. All positive blood culture results were identified as to clinical relevance and source of BSI.

Results: There were a total of 3,053 blood cultures. One hundred fifty-one positive blood cultures were considered pathogenic and clinically significant. Venous access device-related BSI was identified in 31 evaluable patients and 106 blood cultures. Nineteen patients and 45 positive blood cultures were attributable to organ-specific sources.

Conclusion: Two patterns of BSI were identified: 1) venous access device infections without causal mortality and 2) organ-specific site infections with associated 26% mortality.

Keywords: Blood stream infection; Positive blood culture results

Introduction▴Top 

Blood cultures for microbiological analyses are commonly obtained to assist in providing a confirmatory diagnosis of acute infections in a number of clinical areas and diseases. In addition, many institutions require surveillance blood cultures prior to initiation of any antibiotic therapies [1]. When blood culture results are positive, this information represents invaluable data in assisting in antibiotic selection, defining site and potential source of primary infectious origin, and prognosis. General guidelines and prediction rules have been proposed to assist in identifying patients with relatively high probability of positive blood cultures which would then represent true positives and confirmation of blood stream infection (BSI) [2]. However, the vast majority of blood culture results are negative with reported rates of true positive culture results ranging between approximately 4% and 10%, depending upon specific clinical indication. Perhaps even more damaging from a clinical perspective is when the results represent contamination and thus would confuse the clinical management with these false positive results not indicative of factual BSI [3-6].

Cystic fibrosis (CF) represents a disease manifested by both acute and chronic sustained lung infections. Most adult CF patients have received multiple courses of antibiotic therapy, either inhaled as a component of chronic lung heath maintenance, or acutely as inpatient care for acute infectious exacerbations [7]. In addition, adult CF patients frequently have indwelling vascular access devices (foreign bodies) for prolonged durations, which creates another source for both local and BSI [8-10]. In this review, we report the analysis of over 3,000 blood culture results in 150 total adult CF patients over a 15-year period of time from a single institution to define the frequency, clinical impact, and pathogens (both bacterial and fungal) for this disease-specific BSI.

Methods▴Top 

This study was approved including waiver of informed consent by the Human Subjects Protection Office and Institutional Review Board of the Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (HMC). Adult CF patients (18 years of age or older) were identified by the continuous log of active and deceased patients kept daily by the CF Foundation accredited adult program director and coordinator at HMC. Retrospective chart review was performed over the investigational period of January 1, 2001 through December 1, 2015. All blood cultures obtained during this period of time were reviewed and the results were recorded. Afterwards the medical record was reviewed to specifically identify the relevance, impact, site source, therapies, and patient outcome related to each positive blood culture result and associated BSI.

Results▴Top 

During the time period of January 1, 2001 through December 1, 2015, there were 190 adult CF patients registered at the HMC adult CF program, including 53 deaths over that time period. Forty patients did not have blood cultures obtained, which yielded 150 total evaluable adult CF patients with recorded blood culture results. There was a total of 3,053 blood cultures obtained with a mean number per patient equal to 20.5 ± 22.4 (SD) and a range of 1 - 122 cultures per patient. There were a total of 175 (6%) positive blood cultures with an identified potentially pathogenic microbial agent. Upon review of the medical record, two positive blood cultures were of undefined clinical significance or etiology (methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, viridans Streptococcus), and 22 were presumed contaminants and not treated as to clinical significance (2: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and 20: Staphylococcus epidermidis and other coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Oerskovia, Micrococcus species). The remaining 151 (5%) positive blood cultures were considered pathogenic and clinically significant. Four positive blood cultures were polymicrobial (Pseudomonas aeruginosa + methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Pseudomonas aeruginosa + Enterobacter aerogenes; vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VRE) + Candida glabrata; Enterococcus faecalis (not VRE) + Candida albicans).

Venous access device-related BSIs included sources of catheter-related infections and totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs). Catheter-related sources included percutaneously inserted central venous catheters, peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs), and dialysis catheters. Thirty-one (21%) of evaluable patients developed a venous access device-related BSI which accounted for 106 of 151 (70%) positive blood cultures. Sixteen (11%) of these positive blood cultures were related to venous catheters and the majority 90 (60%) were related to TIVAP. Results for both bacterial and fungal-related venous access device infections with associated BSI are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Frequency of Bacterial and Fungal Related Venous Access Device Infections and Associated Bacteremia and Fungemia in Adult Patients (n = 31) With Cystic Fibrosis (2001 - 2015)
 

Table 2.
Click to view
Table 2. Venous Access Device Related Blood Stream Infections in Adult Patients (n = 31) With Cystic Fibrosis (2001 - 2015): Frequency (numerical value relates to total number of positive blood cultures) and Species of Pathogenic Infecting Microbial Agent
 

Organ-specific infectious sources clinically determined to contribute to the positive blood cultures and disseminated BSIs occurred in 19 (13%) evaluable adult CF patients and 45 (30%) of all positive blood cultures. Despite the relatively low frequency of blood stream dissemination from primary lung infection in CF patients reported in the literature, 10 episodes of BSI in this review derived from a lung source (noting five episodes involved Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC)). In addition, nine BSIs resulted from non-lung etiologies. As opposed to the venous access device-related BSIs, where none of the infections were thought to be causally related to mortality, BSIs from organ-specific infections were thought to be the cause of death in five patients. Lung-related sources of BSIs are listed in Table 3 and non-lung sources in Table 4.

Table 3.
Click to view
Table 3. Lung-Specific Related Blood Stream Infections in Adult Patients With Cystic Fibrosis (n = 10) (2001 - 2015): Frequency (Numerical Value Relates to Total Number Positive Blood Cultures) and Species of Pathogenic Infecting Microbial Agent
 

Table 4.
Click to view
Table 4. Non-Lung Organ-Specific Related Blood Stream Infections in Adult Patients With Cystic Fibrosis (n = 9) (2001 - 2015): Frequency (Numerical Value Relates to Total Number Positive Blood Cultures) and Species of Pathogenic Infecting Microbial Agent
 
Discussion▴Top 

Although lacking any defined abnormalities or deficiencies in adaptive humoral or cellular immunity and acknowledging the well-established defect in innate host defense affecting the lungs of individuals with CF, adult patients with CF clearly manifest numerous host defense limitations that place them at risk for infection [11]. These potential risk factors include the unique milieu of the CF lung that allows for the sustained proliferation of highly pathogenic bacteria, multiple invasive procedures and foreign bodies that remain in situ indefinitely with resultant frequent manipulations, malnutrition and CF-related diabetes, propensity for renal calculi and bowel obstruction often requiring invasive surgical procedures, and near constant exposure to antibiotics [12]. This report highlights the impact of many such parameters upon the morbidity and mortality of adult CF patients.

From a clinical perspective, these positive blood culture results and associated BSIs can be divided into two categories, primary infections related to nosocomial contamination of venous access devices and secondary BSIs resulting from localized organ-specific infections with secondary hematogenous dissemination.

The majority of BSIs [70%] resulted from invasive indwelling venous catheters, foreign bodies, and TIVAP. These BSIs were caused by a wide variety of both bacterial and fungal infecting pathogens [13, 14]. Although not specifically assessed in this retrospective chart review, it must be anticipated with high probability that these primary nosocomial infections would have significant negative health outcomes both for patients (symptoms, additional procedures, hospitalizations, prolonged lengths of stay, additional antibiotics), heath care providers, and resources (costs and resource utilization). Despite being a potential source of burden and disease to adult CF patients, these venous access device-related infections were not causally linked to mortality.

In contrast, the majority of mortality from BSIs resulted from catastrophic organ infections associated with tissue destruction and dissemination into the blood stream systemically. Although lacking histological or autopsy evidence in all cases, retrospective review of the medical records for each patient clearly documented clinical, laboratory, and radiographic supporting evidence for these invasive infections. For non-lung-related organ-generated BSIs, we particularly highlight the occurrences of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacterial endocarditis and pyelonephritis/kidney abscess resultant from Candida glabrata infection, the latter being fatal. In relation to lung-generated BSIs, our data again reflect current knowledge in emphasizing the invasive pathogenicity of BCC. In this report, BCC caused extensive cavitary lung disease in three patients and was directly responsible for death in three patients. This is in contrast to the single identified case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung dissemination which was not fatal. It is worth noting that Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most common infectious agent in the lungs of patients with CF based upon 2014 CF Foundation Patient Registry data approximating 66%, while BCC lung infection was reported in only 3.4% [15].

In summary, based upon this single institution study over a 15-year period, we have identified a high prevalence of disseminated BSIs based upon positive blood culture results. Theoretically, 31 evaluable patients (21%), 47 events, and 106 (70%) of the positive blood cultures due to venous catheter or TIVAP-related infections were preventable. The invasive nature of BCC lung infection and propensity of BCC bacteria to invade the blood stream leading to the development of sepsis from “Cepacia syndrome” which is associated with a high mortality was again evident [12, 16, 17].

Conflicts of Interest

None.

Funding Support

None.


References▴Top 
  1. Coburn B, Morris AM, Tomlinson G, Detsky AS. Does this adult patient with suspected bacteremia require blood cultures? JAMA. 2012;308(5):502-511.
    doi pubmed
  2. Shapiro NI, Wolfe RE, Wright SB, Moore R, Bates DW. Who needs a blood culture? A prospectively derived and validated prediction rule. J Emerg Med. 2008;35(3):255-264.
    doi pubmed
  3. Weinstein MP, Towns ML, Quartey SM, Mirrett S, Reimer LG, Parmigiani G, Reller LB. The clinical significance of positive blood cultures in the 1990s: a prospective comprehensive evaluation of the microbiology, epidemiology, and outcome of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24(4):584-602.
    doi pubmed
  4. Towns ML, Jarvis WR, Hsueh PR. Guidelines on blood cultures. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2010;43(4):347-349.
    doi
  5. Roque P, Oliver B, Anderson L, Mulrow M, Drachman D, Stapczynski S, LoVecchio F. Inpatient utilization of blood cultures drawn in an urban ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(1):110-114.
    doi pubmed
  6. Ratzinger F, Dedeyan M, Rammerstorfer M, Perkmann T, Burgmann H, Makristathis A, Dorffner G, et al. A risk prediction model for screening bacteremic patients: a cross sectional study. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106765.
    doi pubmed
  7. Gibson RL, Burns JL, Ramsey BW. Pathophysiology and management of pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168(8):918-951.
    doi pubmed
  8. Aitken ML, Tonelli MR. Complications of indwelling catheters in cystic fibrosis: a 10-year review. Chest. 2000;118(6):1598-1602.
    doi
  9. Kariyawasam HH, Pepper JR, Hodson ME, Geddes DM. Experience of totally implantable venous access devices (TIV ADs) in adults with cystic fibrosis over a 13-year period. Respir Med. 2000;94(12):1161-1165.
    doi pubmed
  10. Burdon J, Conway SP, Murchan P, Lansdown M, Kester RC. Five years' experience of PAS Port intravenous access system in adult cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 1998;12(1):212-216.
    doi pubmed
  11. Ratjen F, Doring G. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 2003;361(9358):681-689.
    doi
  12. O'Sullivan BP, Freedman SD. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 2009;373(9678):1891-1904.
    doi
  13. Gaber KA, Shenton L, Oades P, Colville A, Sheldon CD. Fungal septicaemia in patients with cystic fibrosis associated with totally implantable venous access device system. J Cyst Fibros. 2007;6(5):317-319.
    doi pubmed
  14. Parienti JJ, Mongardon N, Megarbane B, Mira JP, Kalfon P, Gros A, Marque S, et al. Intravascular Complications of Central Venous Catheterization by Insertion Site. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(13):1220-1229.
    doi pubmed
  15. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. 2014 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry, Bethesda, MD. 2014.
  16. Frangolias DD, Mahenthiralingam E, Rae S, Raboud JM, Davidson AG, Wittmann R, Wilcox PG. Burkholderia cepacia in cystic fibrosis. Variable disease course. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160(5 Pt 1):1572-1577.
    doi pubmed
  17. De Boeck K, Malfroot A, Van Schil L, Lebecque P, Knoop C, Govan JR, Doherty C, et al. Epidemiology of Burkholderia cepacia complex colonisation in cystic fibrosis patients. Eur Respir J. 2004;23(6):851-856.
    doi pubmed


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Clinical Medicine Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, monthly, ISSN 1918-3003 (print), 1918-3011 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jocmr.org   editorial contact: editor@jocmr.org     elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.