J Clin Med Res
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 8, Number 12, December 2016, pages 863-869


Effect of L-Carnitine in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis on Energy Metabolism Using Indirect Calorimetry: A Pilot Study

Yoshiyuki Sakaia, Hiroki Nishikawaa, Hirayuki Enomotoa, b, Kazunori Yoha, Yoshinori Iwataa, Kunihiro Hasegawaa, Chikage Nakanoa, Kyohei Kishinoa, Yoshihiro Shimonoa, Ryo Takataa, Takashi Nishimuraa, Nobuhiro Aizawaa, Naoto Ikedaa, Tomoyuki Takashimaa, Akio Ishiia, Hiroko Iijimaa, Shuhei Nishiguchia

aDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501, Japan
bCorresponding Author: Hirayuki Enomoto, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Mukogawa-cho 1-1, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 663-8501, Japan

Manuscript accepted for publication September 13, 2016
Short title: L-Carnitine Therapy in Cirrhotic Patients
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2734w

Abstract▴Top 

Background: L-carnitine supplementation has been suggested to show several favorable effects on patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). However, there have been no reports regarding the effect of L-carnitine on energy metabolism in patients with LC using indirect calorimetry which is a well-established method for assessing the degree of liver malnutrition. We examined the effect of L-carnitine in patients with LC on energy metabolism using indirect calorimetry.

Methods: A total of 13 LC patients who are scheduled to be treated with L-carnitine (1,800 mg/day) were analyzed in this study. None of the patients previously received L-carnitine. An evaluation of the nutritional status was performed at the initiation of L-carnitine therapy and after 4 weeks of L-carnitine therapy. We evaluated the effect of L-carnitine on the nutritional status and energy metabolism by comparing various clinical variables at these two time points. In addition, the changes in the nutritional status of the patients were also evaluated using indirect calorimetry.

Results: After 4 weeks of L-carnitine treatment, for all cases, the mean substrate oxidation rates of carbohydrate (%C) increased from 37.6% to 48.2%, the mean substrate oxidation rates of fat (%F) decreased from 40.2% to 31.9% and the mean substrate oxidation rates of protein (%P) decreased from 22.2% to 19.9%. In a subgroup analysis of patients with baseline non-protein respiratory quotient (npRQ) < 0.85, the mean %C increased from 15.3% to 34.2%, the mean %F decreased from 59.9% to 45.1%, and the mean %P decreased from 24.8% to 20.6%. After 4 weeks of L-carnitine treatment, for all cases (n = 13), the mean value of npRQ increased in comparison with the baseline levels, although the difference was not significant (0.868 ± 0.060 vs. 0.838 ± 0.097, P = 0.19). Conversely, in patients with baseline npRQ < 0.85, the npRQ value significantly increased after 4 weeks treatment of L-carnitine compared with the baseline levels (0.827 ± 0.030 vs. 0.760 ± 0.043, P = 0.016).

Conclusion: L-carnitine supplementation can be useful for improving energy metabolism, especially in patients who have an advanced LC status and lower baseline npRQ values.

Keywords: Liver cirrhosis; L-carnitine; Indirect calorimetry; Non-protein respiratory quotient; Energy metabolism

Introduction▴Top 

The liver is the major organ for the metabolism of three major nutrients: protein, fat, and carbohydrates [1-3]. Liver cirrhosis (LC), which develops over a long period of time due to chronic inflammation such as hepatitis virus infection, is frequently complicated with protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) [1, 2, 4, 5]. PEM is one of the most common complications in LC patients and it is closely associated with a high morbidity and mortality in patients with LC [1, 2, 4, 5].

Carnitine (β-hydroxy-γ-N-trimethylaminobutyric acid) is widely distributed in food from animal sources. In humans, 75% of carnitine is obtained from the diet [6]. L-carnitine (4-N-trimethyl ammonium 3-hydroxybutyric acid; the biologically active stereoisomer), which is involved in β-oxidation of fatty acids, is a conditionally synthesized nutrient from amino acids methionine and lysine in the brain, liver and kidney [6-8]. It is largely obtained from meat and dairy products [6-8]. Carnitine is responsible for transporting fatty acids into the mitochondria and it is involved in energy production by fat burning associated with β-oxidation [6, 9]. L-carnitine is a derivative with high bioactivity in carnitine derivatives [9, 10]. L-carnitine is a required nutrient in energy production and its deficiency is known to decrease energy availability in vital organs, especially in the liver [8, 11]. Carnitine deficiency has been demonstrated to be linked to LC [11, 12]. The administration of L-carnitine has been suggested to be a safe alternative treatment for LC patients. In the field of clinical practice, Malaguarnera reported that LC patients treated with L-carnitine showed greater reductions in serum ammonia levels as well as improvements in neuropsychological functioning in comparison with placebo [13]. On the other hand, Nakanishi et al demonstrated in their prospective study that L-carnitine reduces muscle cramps in LC patients [14].

Indirect calorimetry is a well-established method for assessing the degree of liver malnutrition as it provides non-protein respiratory quotients (npRQ) and rest energy expenditure (REE) as useful markers to estimate energy metabolism [15]. Particularly, LC patients with npRQ of less than 0.85 had a significantly poorer survival as compared with those with npRQ of 0.85 or more [15]. Energy metabolism in patients with LC is characterized by increased energy consumption compared with healthy individuals, even at rest [15]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports regarding the effect of L-carnitine on energy metabolism in patients with LC using indirect calorimetry. In the present study, we examined the effect of L-carnitine in patients with LC on energy metabolism using indirect calorimetry.

Patients and Methods▴Top 

Patients

A total of 14 LC patients who were scheduled to be treated with L-carnitine between December 2014 and February 2015 at the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan, were enrolled in this study. None of the patients previously received L-carnitine. LC was diagnosed using laboratory parameters or radiological findings. Among the patients, one patient developed rupture of esophageal varices after registration in this trial and was excluded from the current analysis. Thus, a total of 13 patients were analyzed in this study.

An evaluation of the nutritional status using indirect calorimetry was performed at the initiation of L-carnitine therapy and after 4 weeks of L-carnitine therapy in an outpatient basis. All patients received L-carnitine (600 mg) three times a day (1,800 mg/day) for at least 4 weeks. Laboratory data were also analyzed at the initiation of L-carnitine therapy and after 4 weeks of L-carnitine therapy. We prospectively evaluated the effect of L-carnitine on the nutritional status and energy metabolism by comparing variables at these two time points.

The ethics committee of our hospital approved the current study protocol (No. 1758) and this study protocol complied with all of the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to L-carnitine therapy.

Indirect calorimetry

The parameters measured by indirect calorimetry were carbon dioxide production per minute (VCO2) and oxygen consumption per minute (VO2). Total urinary excretion of nitrogen (UN) was measured as reported previously [15, 16]. npRQ, REE, and substrate oxidation rates of fat (%F), carbohydrate (%C) and protein (%P) were calculated using the following formulas: 1) npRQ = (1.44VCO2 - 4.890UN)/(1.44VO2 - 6.04UN); 2) REE (kcal/day) = 5.50VO2 + 1.76VCO2 - 1.99UN; 3) F (g/24 h)= 2.432VO2 + 2.432VCO2 - 1.943UN; 4) C (g/24 h) = 5.926VO2 + 4.189VCO2 - 2.539UN; 5) P (g/24 h) = 6.250UN; 6) %F = 9.46F/REE × 100; 7) %C = 4.18C/REE × 100; and 8) %P = 4.32P/REE × 100 [15, 17-19]. REE was determined in the morning after an overnight fast (12 h).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were compared by a paired t-test. Data were analyzed using the JMP software program for Microsoft Windows. Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results▴Top 

Baseline characteristics

The subjects included eight males and 5 females. The mean ± SD age was 67.2 ± 13.1 years. The etiologies of LC were chronic hepatitis B virus infection in one patient, chronic hepatitis C virus infection in seven, alcoholic in three and others in two. Regarding the Child-Pugh classification, there were six patients with Child-Pugh A, five with Child-Pugh B and two with Child-Pugh C. None of the patients were complicated with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Changes in parameters before and after 4 weeks of L-carnitine therapy

After 4 weeks of L-carnitine treatment, total carnitine (P < 0.001), free carnitine (P < 0.001), acyl carnitine (P < 0.001) and free fatty acid (P = 0.004) significantly increased as compared with the baseline levels. The mean value of npRQ at 4 weeks increased, although the difference was not significant (P = 0.19, Table 1 and Fig. 1a).

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Changes of Parameters Before and After 4 Weeks of L-Carnitine Therapy (n = 13)
 

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. Changes in the non-protein respiratory quotient (npRQ) before and after 4 weeks of L-carnitine therapy. (a) For all cases (n = 13), the npRQ value at 4 weeks increased as compared with the baseline levels, although the difference was not significant (P = 0.12). (b) In patients with baseline npRQ < 0.85 (n = 7), the npRQ value significantly increased as compared with the baseline levels after 4 weeks of L-carnitine treatment (P = 0.016).

Next, we performed a subgroup analysis of patients with baseline npRQ < 0.85 (n = 7), since npRQ < 0.85 has been reported to be an adverse predictive factor in LC patients, as mentioned above [15]. After 4 weeks of L-carnitine treatment, total carnitine (P = 0.001), free carnitine (P = 0.001) and acyl carnitine (P = 0.006) significantly increased as compared with the baseline levels. In addition, the npRQ value significantly increased as compared with the baseline levels (P = 0.016, Table 2 and Fig. 1b).

Table 2.
Click to view
Table 2. Changes of Parameters Before and After 4 Weeks of L-Carnitine Therapy in Patients With npRQ < 0.85 (n = 7)
 

Energy metabolism before and after L-carnitine therapy

For all cases, the mean %C was 37.6%, the mean %F was 40.2% and the mean %P was 22.2% during L-carnitine therapy. After 4 weeks of L-carnitine therapy, the mean %C increased to 48.2%, the mean %F decreased to 31.9% and the mean %P decreased to 19.9%, which indicated an improvement in energy metabolism (Table 1 and Fig. 2a). In the subgroup analysis of patients with baseline npRQ < 0.85, the mean %C was 15.3%, the mean %F was 59.9% and the mean %P was 24.8% during L-carnitine therapy. After 4 weeks of L-carnitine therapy, the mean %C increased to 34.2%, the mean %F decreased to 45.1% and the mean %P decreased to 20.6%, suggesting an improvement in energy metabolism (Table 2 and Fig. 2b).

Figure 2.
Click for large image
Figure 2. Changes in energy metabolism before and after L-carnitine therapy. (a) For all cases, the mean %C was 37.6%, the mean %F was 40.2% and the mean %P was 22.2% at the time of L-carnitine therapy. After 4 weeks of L-carnitine therapy, the mean %C increased to 48.2%, the mean %F decreased to 31.9% and the mean %P decreased to 19.9%, which indicated an improvement in energy metabolism. (b) In a subgroup analysis of patients with baseline npRQ < 0.85, the mean %C was 15.3%, the mean %F was 59.9% and the mean %P was 24.8% at the time of L-carnitine therapy. After 4 weeks of L-carnitine therapy, the mean %C increased to 34.2%, the mean %F decreased to 45.1% and the mean %P decreased to 20.6%, suggesting an improvement in energy metabolism. Data are expressed as mean values.

Changes in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels between baseline and 4 weeks

Previous studies demonstrated that hsCRP is a prognostic factor in patients with LC [20-22]. Thus, we tested the hsCRP concentration using stored sera at baseline and 4 weeks. For all patients, the hsCRP concentration at 4 weeks (0.15 ± 0.15 mg/dL) significantly decreased as compared with the hsCRP concentration at baseline (0.20 ± 0.17 mg/dL) (P = 0.022, Fig. 3a). In patients with npRQ value < 0.85, the hsCRP concentration at 4 weeks (0.19 ± 0.19 mg/dL) tended to decrease as compared with the hsCRP concentration at baseline (0.24 ± 0.20 mg/dL) (P = 0.11, Fig. 3b).

Figure 3.
Click for large image
Figure 3. Changes in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels between baseline and 4 weeks. (a) For all patients, the hsCRP level at 4 weeks significantly decreased as compared with the hsCRP level at baseline (P = 0.022). (b) In patients with a npRQ value < 0.85, the hsCRP level at 4 weeks tended to decrease as compared with the hsCRP level at baseline (P = 0.11).
Discussion▴Top 

As mentioned above, several investigators reported that L-carnitine reduced serum ammonia levels, leading to an improvement in hepatic encephalopathy, and ameliorated LC-related neurological findings and LC-related clinical symptoms such as muscle cramps [13, 14, 23]. Moreover, several recent studies demonstrated that L-carnitine supplementation contributed to normalization of liver enzymes and an improvement in cytopenia during treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis B or C infection [24, 25]. However, there have been no reports regarding the effect of L-carnitine on energy metabolism using indirect calorimetry. Thus, there is an urgent need to clarify these issues. We therefore conducted this prospective pilot study. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective study to assess the effect of L-carnitine therapy on energy metabolism in patients with LC.

In our study, the npRQ value tended to increase after 4 weeks of L-carnitine therapy as compared with the baseline levels for all cases, and in patients with baseline npRQ < 0.85, the npRQ levels significantly increased compared with the baseline levels. Furthermore, after 4 weeks of L-carnitine therapy, the %C increased, the %F decreased and the %P decreased. These results indicated that L-carnitine supplementation leads to the improvement of energy metabolism, especially in patients with an advanced LC status such as Child-Pugh classification of B or C. L-carnitine therapy can be recommended for such patients. Our results may partly explain the reasons why clinical symptoms in advanced LC patients improve after L-carnitine therapy. On the other hand, in this study, the serum ammonia levels did not significantly decrease after L-carnitine therapy. This may be attributed to the small sample size.

Nakanishi et al previously demonstrated that the dose of L-carnitine was significantly associated with the percentages of patients with reduced muscle cramps [14]. In their cohort, they included patients who started at an L-carnitine dose of 900 mg/day and those with 1,200 mg/day. However, in our study, we set the dose of L-carnitine at 1,800 mg/day. Thus, the doses of L-carnitine vary between studies and the optimal dose of L-carnitine in LC patients remains unclear [14, 26]. Further investigations are required to clarify these issues.

A recent study revealed that free fatty acid (FFA) rose in parallel with increasing disease severity as defined by the Child-Pugh classification [18]. Another previous study demonstrated that a higher serum FFA level may suggest the presence of nocturnal hypoglycemia in HCV-related compensated LC patients [27]. In view of this, the FFA value is expected to decrease after L-carnitine therapy. However, in our analysis, after 4-week treatment of L-carnitine, FFA significantly increased contrary to our expectations. Although the reason for this discrepancy is unclear, insulin resistance, which partly regulates fat metabolism, may be attributed to these discrepancies [28-31]. Indeed, in our subjects with baseline homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) ≥ 2.5 (n = 9), FFA at 4 weeks after L-carnitine therapy significantly increased as compared with the baseline levels (mean value: 612 μEq/L (baseline) and 807 μEq/L (after 4-week treatment), P = 0.013). However, no definitive conclusion can be reached and further studies are needed to clarify these issues.

It is of note that the hsCRP concentration significantly decreased after 4 weeks of L-carnitine therapy for all cases. One potential reason for this result is that REE in 4 weeks decreased as compared with that at baseline (from 1,402.4 kcal/day (mean value, baseline) to 1,379.9 kcal/day (mean value, 4 weeks)). Inadequate energy consumption in LC patients can cause higher systemic inflammation [1, 5, 32]. The improvement in energy metabolism by L-carnitine therapy may be associated with an improvement in systemic inflammation and may lead to ameliorating the clinical outcome in LC patients, as hsCRP has been reported to be a prognostic factor in LC patients [20-22].

Although our study has a limitation of a small sample size, we prospectively demonstrated that energy metabolism as defined by npRQ using indirect calorimetry improved after L-carnitine therapy. According to the present results, we plan to conduct a future larger prospective study.

In conclusion, L-carnitine supplementation can be useful for improving energy metabolism, especially in advanced LC patients.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all medical staffs in our nutritional guidance room for data collection.

Financial Disclosure

Shuhei Nishiguchi received financial support from Ajinomoto Pharmaceuticals Co., LTD and Otsuka Pharmaceuticals Co., LTD.

Abbreviations

LC: liver cirrhosis; PEM: protein-energy malnutrition; npRQ: non-protein respiratory quotients; REE: rest energy expenditure; VCO2: carbon dioxide production per minute; VO2: oxygen consumption per minute; UN: rinary excretion of nitrogen; %F: substrate oxidation rates of fat; %C: substrate oxidation rates of carbohydrate; %P: substrate oxidation rates of protein; SD: standard deviation; hsCRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; FFA: free fatty acid


References▴Top 
  1. Moriwaki H, Miwa Y, Tajika M, Kato M, Fukushima H, Shiraki M. Branched-chain amino acids as a protein- and energy-source in liver cirrhosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;313(2):405-409.
    doi pubmed
  2. Charlton M. Branched-chain amino acid enriched supplements as therapy for liver disease. J Nutr. 2006;136(1 Suppl):295S-298S.
    pubmed
  3. Nishikawa H, Osaki Y. Clinical significance of therapy using branched-chain amino acid granules in patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2014;44(2):149-158.
    doi pubmed
  4. Hanai T, Shiraki M, Nishimura K, Ohnishi S, Imai K, Suetsugu A, Takai K, et al. Sarcopenia impairs prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis. Nutrition. 2015;31(1):193-199.
    doi pubmed
  5. Nishikawa H, Osaki Y. Liver Cirrhosis: Evaluation, Nutritional Status, and Prognosis. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:872152.
    doi pubmed
  6. Kendler BS. Carnitine: an overview of its role in preventive medicine. Prev Med. 1986;15(4):373-390.
    doi
  7. Malaguarnera M. Carnitine derivatives: clinical usefulness. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012;28(2):166-176.
    doi pubmed
  8. Thangasamy T, Subathra M, Sittadjody S, Jeyakumar P, Joyee AG, Mendoza E, Chinnakkanu P. Role of L-carnitine in the modulation of immune response in aged rats. Clin Chim Acta. 2008;389(1-2):19-24.
    doi pubmed
  9. Indiveri C, Iacobazzi V, Tonazzi A, Giangregorio N, Infantino V, Convertini P, Console L, et al. The mitochondrial carnitine/acylcarnitine carrier: function, structure and physiopathology. Mol Aspects Med. 2011;32(4-6):223-233.
    doi pubmed
  10. Jiang Q, Jiang G, Shi KQ, Cai H, Wang YX, Zheng MH. Oral acetyl-L-carnitine treatment in hepatic encephalopathy: view of evidence-based medicine. Ann Hepatol. 2013;12(5):803-809.
    pubmed
  11. Krahenbuhl S, Reichen J. Carnitine metabolism in patients with chronic liver disease. Hepatology. 1997;25(1):148-153.
    doi
  12. Cave MC, Hurt RT, Frazier TH, Matheson PJ, Garrison RN, McClain CJ, McClave SA. Obesity, inflammation, and the potential application of pharmaconutrition. Nutr Clin Pract. 2008;23(1):16-34.
    doi pubmed
  13. Malaguarnera M, Gargante MP, Cristaldi E, Vacante M, Risino C, Cammalleri L, Pennisi G, et al. Acetyl-L-carnitine treatment in minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53(11):3018-3025.
    doi pubmed
  14. Nakanishi H, Kurosaki M, Tsuchiya K, Nakakuki N, Takada H, Matsuda S, Gondo K, et al. L-carnitine Reduces Muscle Cramps in Patients With Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(8):1540-1543.
    doi pubmed
  15. Tajika M, Kato M, Mohri H, Miwa Y, Kato T, Ohnishi H, Moriwaki H. Prognostic value of energy metabolism in patients with viral liver cirrhosis. Nutrition. 2002;18(3):229-234.
    doi
  16. Dickerson RN, Tidwell AC, Minard G, Croce MA, Brown RO. Predicting total urinary nitrogen excretion from urinary urea nitrogen excretion in multiple-trauma patients receiving specialized nutritional support. Nutrition. 2005;21(3):332-338.
    doi pubmed
  17. Kato M, Miwa Y, Tajika M, Hiraoka T, Muto Y, Moriwaki H. Preferential use of branched-chain amino acids as an energy substrate in patients with liver cirrhosis. Intern Med. 1998;37(5):429-434.
    doi pubmed
  18. Hanai T, Shiraki M, Nishimura K, Imai K, Suetsugu A, Takai K, Shimizu M, et al. Free fatty acid as a marker of energy malnutrition in liver cirrhosis. Hepatol Res. 2014;44(2):218-228.
    doi pubmed
  19. Teramoto A, Yamanaka-Okumura H, Urano E, Nakamura-Kutsuzawa T, Sugihara K, Katayama T, Miyake H, et al. Comparison of measured and predicted energy expenditure in patients with liver cirrhosis. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2014;23(2):197-204.
    pubmed
  20. Mortensen C, Andersen O, Krag A, Bendtsen F, Moller S. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels predict survival and are related to haemodynamics in alcoholic cirrhosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24(6):619-626.
    doi pubmed
  21. Cho Y, Park SY, Lee JH, Lee DH, Lee M, Yoo JJ, Choi WM, et al. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein level is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48(5):444-449.
    pubmed
  22. Cervoni JP, Thevenot T, Weil D, Muel E, Barbot O, Sheppard F, Monnet E, et al. C-reactive protein predicts short-term mortality in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2012;56(6):1299-1304.
    doi pubmed
  23. Vidot H, Carey S, Allman-Farinelli M, Shackel N. Systematic review: the treatment of muscle cramps in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;40(3):221-232.
    doi pubmed
  24. Jun DW, Kim BI, Cho YK, Kim HJ, Kwon YO, Park SY, Han SY, et al. Efficacy and safety of entecavir plus carnitine complex (GODEX(R)) compared to entecavir monotherapy in patient with ALT elevated chronic hepatitis B: randomized, multicenter open-label trials. The GOAL study. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2013;19(2):165-172.
    doi pubmed
  25. Malaguarnera M, Vacante M, Giordano M, Motta M, Bertino G, Pennisi M, Neri S, et al. L-carnitine supplementation improves hematological pattern in patients affected by HCV treated with Peg interferon-alpha 2b plus ribavirin. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(39):4414-4420.
    doi pubmed
  26. Cruciani RA, Revuelta M, Dvorkin E, Homel P, Lesage P, Esteban-Cruciani N. L-carnitine supplementation in patients with HIV/AIDS and fatigue: a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. HIV AIDS (Auckl). 2015;7:65-73.
    doi
  27. Kawaguchi T, Itou M, Taniguchi E, Sakata M, Abe M, Koga H, Oriishi T, et al. Serum level of free fatty acids is associated with nocturnal hypoglycemia in cirrhotic patients with HCV infection: a pilot study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58(105):103-108.
    pubmed
  28. Asrih M, Jornayvaz FR. Metabolic syndrome and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Is insulin resistance the link? Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;41(8 Pt 1):55-65.
    doi pubmed
  29. Pereira S, Shah A, George Fantus I, Joseph JW, Giacca A. Effect of N-acetyl-l-cysteine on insulin resistance caused by prolonged free fatty acid elevation. J Endocrinol. 2015;225(1):1-7.
    doi pubmed
  30. Pereira S, Park E, Mori Y, Haber CA, Han P, Uchida T, Stavar L, et al. FFA-induced hepatic insulin resistance in vivo is mediated by PKCdelta, NADPH oxidase, and oxidative stress. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;307(1):E34-46.
    doi pubmed
  31. Birkenfeld AL, Shulman GI. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, hepatic insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. Hepatology. 2014;59(2):713-723.
    doi pubmed
  32. Coltart I, Tranah TH, Shawcross DL. Inflammation and hepatic encephalopathy. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2013;536(2):189-196.
    doi pubmed


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Clinical Medicine Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, monthly, ISSN 1918-3003 (print), 1918-3011 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jocmr.org   editorial contact: editor@jocmr.org     elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.