J Clin Med Res
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Review

Volume 2, Number 1, February 2010, pages 18-22


Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Thrombophilia

Maristella D’Uvaa, Pierpaolo Di Miccob, c, Ida Strinaa, Giuseppe De Placidoa

aDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Human Reproduction, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
bInternal Medicine Division, Buonconsiglio Fatebenefratelli Hospital of Naples, Naples, Italy
cCorresponding author: Internal Medicine Division, Buonconsiglio Fatebenefratelli Hospital of Naples, Via San Giacomo dei Capri 69, Naples, Italy

Manuscript accepted for publication February 05, 2010
Short title: Pregnancy Loss and Thrombophilia
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jocmr2010.02.260w

Abstract▴Top 

Emerging data seem to be available also on the role of active thromboprophylaxis with heparin and pregnancy outcome. In the last decades we found many data concerning the association between a hypercoagulable state and its causes and adverse pregnancy outcome, in particular recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). First studies which focused on the association between thrombophilia and RPL underlined the role of reduced clotting inhibitors and RPL, and subsequent studies underlined a pathogenetic role of gene variant associated to hypercoagulable state in the occurrence of RPL. On the other hand, acquired thrombophilic abnormalities as antiphipsholipid syndrome are a well known cause of RPL and should be considered for a screening. These data are relevant because recent studies suggested a role of an extensive thromprophilaxis in women with RPL that should be addressed only in case of known thrombophilia and high risk of venous thromboembolism.

Keywords: Thrombophilia; Recurrent pregnancy loss; Factor V Leiden; Hyperhomocysteinemia; Antiphospholipid antibodies; PAI 4G\4G

Introduction▴Top 

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) represents a major health problem with two to three or more losses in up to 5% of women of reproductive age and is actually one of the most common causes of female sterility [1]. Several reports identify inherited predisposition to thrombophilia as one of the main causes of RPL in particular if several diseases potentially responsible of RPL have been already excluded such as endocrine diseases (such as ovarian dysfunction, anovulation, hypopituitarism and diabetes), uterine malformation, genetic alterations (for example, chromosomal aberrations), inflammatory diseases (in particular systemic lupus erythematosus) and infectious diseases [2-5]. From a pathological point of view, women affected by thrombophilia show during their pregnancy a hypercoagulable state that is already increased during pregnancy, which may impair placental flow and then its function and fetal growth and may predispose to develop venous thrombosis [6].

During pregnancy, in fact, we may observe many changes in the haemostatic balance with a trend toward thrombophilia in order to be prompt for the haemostatic challenge of delivery [2, 6-7]. Thus, pregnancy is a condition associated to thrombophilia per se and for this reason it is associated with the increase of several clotting factors (namely factor VIII, vWF, fibrinogen and factor VII) [7]. Moreover, also other markers of a hypercoagulable state are increased during pregnancy, such as D-dimer and/or prothrombin fragment 1+2 [7,8]. For this reason we may observe episodes of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy [9]. Moreover, women carrying further thrombotic risk factors such as inherited thrombophilia show an additionally increased risk of thrombotic events during pregnancy such as venous thromboembolism and/or abortion [10].

VTE and pulmonary embolism (PE), in fact, continue to be a leading cause of maternal death during pregnancy or postpartum and may cause significant morbidity of pregnant women.

The aim of the review is to focus fundamental clinical aspect of thrombophilias in the occurrence of RPL.

Inherited Thrombophilia and Pregnancy Loss▴Top 

Thrombophilia has been identified as one of the main causes of RPL with a percentage of until 40%, in particular early RPL [11]. Although several studies on this topic are available in the literature to confirm this trend, rates of thrombophilia seem to differ from study to study because of different inclusion criteria and different ethnic backgrounds of the selected patients [12]. In this clinical setting we may differentiate inherited thrombophilia, acquired thrombophilia and combined thrombophilia [13-14].

Inherited thrombophilia may be due to deficiency of clotting inhibitors or to gene variants leading to a hypercoagulable tendency. Gene variants frequently associated with RPL are prothrombin A20210G and/or factor V Leiden. Prothrombin A20210G has been identified as a risk factor for pregnancy loss in several studies and has been associated mainly to early RPL [15-19]. On the other hand, factor V Leiden, which is responsible for more than 75% of inherited activated protein C resistance, is the more common inherited thrombotic risk factor associated to RPL [20-22]. In particular, a case control study by Ridker et al. has reported an increased prevalence of FVL in women with RPL, while other studies revealed a strong relationship between FVL and early RPL [23]. FVL has been identified as a risk factor also for late RPL [24]. Also deficiency of clotting inhibitors, such as protein S, protein C and/or antithrombin, has been clearly associated to RPL since 1996 [25,26].

In the latest years an emerging role has been suggested and underlined also for the PAI-1 4G\5G gene variant that may be associated to hypofibrinolysis and so to hypercogulable state. Several reports underlined the association between 4G\4G genotype of PAI-1 and RPL [27,28] and this association seems to be relevant if anamnestic VTE is also present [29]. Yet more detailed data on large based population are needed in next years.

Hyperhomocysteinemia▴Top 

A pathogenetic role of hyperhomocysteinemia (HHCY) in RPL has been underlined by several reports on this topic, but data available in the literature are actually not univocal. Several authors reported increasing evidences for the relationship between HHCY, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphism C677T (MTHFR C677T) and RPL, in particular early RPL [25,30-32]. On the other hand, further authors found a negative association between HHCY and early RPL [33-35].

Acquired Thrombophilia▴Top 

Several authors underlined the role of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in the pathophysiology of RPL [36-48]. To confirm this point, actually adverse pregnancy outcome is considered as one of the diagnostic criteria of APS (Table 1) according to the guidelines of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis and the American Rheumatology Association [49,50]. During APS, a large variety of autoantibodies also toward clotting factors, such as factor XII, has been found [51,52]. However, a clear explanation of all involved processes on the roles of antiphospholipid antibodies and of autoantibodies toward clotting factors is still matter of discussion.

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Diagnostic Criteria to Detect Antiphospholipid Syndrome
 

On the other hand, new evidence seems to be available for the role of increased maternal plasma levels of clotting factor VIII and the risk of RPL [53]. Furthermore, acquired activated protein C resistance, which is not associated with the presence of FVL, has been described in several women with RPL, but also in this case, not all involved mechanisms are known [54].

Combined Thrombophilia▴Top 

Combined thrombophilia, namely inherited thrombophilia associated with acquired thrombophilia or more than one inherited thrombophilic defect, has also been identified as a cause of RPL, but its real frequency is not clear. Several studies in the latest years identified combined thrombophilic defects in women with RPL both early RPL and late RPL [10,28,55].

Conclusions▴Top 

Active surveillance of women referred to gynecological centers for RPL should be supported by thrombophilia screening. This approach may be helpful to fight this major health problem that involves up to 5% of women of reproductive age by an appropriate antithrombotic treatment. Inherited and/or acquired thrombophilia has been diagnosed in 50% to 65% of women with history of unexplained RPL and in nearly 20% of women with RPL with age of more than 35 years [56].

This gynecological and clinical aspect may be considered in particular if anamnesis reveals the presence of personal and\or familial trend to develop thrombotic disorders in particular VTE. So an appropriate clinical evaluation focused on diagnosis and therapy of RPL should also consider thrombophilic defects.


References▴Top 
  1. Sarig G, Younis JS, Hoffman R, Lanir N, Blumenfeld Z, Brenner B. Thrombophilia is common in women with idiopathic pregnancy loss and is associated with late pregnancy wastage. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(2):342-347.
    pubmed
  2. Eldor A. Thrombophilia, thrombosis and pregnancy. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86(1):104-111.
    pubmed
  3. Carp H, Salomon O, Seidman D, Dardik R, Rosenberg N, Inbal A. Prevalence of genetic markers for thrombophilia in recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(6):1633-1637.
    pubmed
  4. Prandoni P, Tormene D, Simioni P, Girolami A. Venous thromboembolism, fetal loss and preeclampsia in pregnant women with congenital thrombophilia. Clin Lab. 2001;47:3-4.155-159.
    pubmed
  5. Di Micco, D'Uva M, Strina I, De Placido, Di Fiore, Quaranta S, Castaldo G. Recurrent pregnancy loss and thrombophilia. Clin Lab. 2007;53:5-6.309-314.
    pubmed
  6. Abbate R, Lenti M, Fatini C, Gazzini A, Lapini I, Fedi S. Lipercoagulabilit gravidica e puerperale. Haematologica. 2003;88(Suppl.7):1-2.
  7. Hathaway WE and Goodnight SH Jr. Thrombosis in pregnancy. In: Disorders of hemostasis and thrombosis. A clinical guide (Eds.) Hathaway WE, Goodnight HS Jr. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1993:430-6
  8. de Boer K, ten Cate JW, Sturk A, Borm JJ, Treffers PE. Enhanced thrombin generation in normal and hypertensive pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160(1):95-100.
    pubmed
  9. Colman-Brochu S. Deep vein thrombosis in pregnancy. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2004;29(3):186-192.
    pubmed
  10. Robertson L, Wu O, Langhorne P, Twaddle S, Clark P, Lowe GD, Walker ID, et al. Thrombophilia in pregnancy: a systematic review. Br J Haematol. 2006;132(2):171-196.
    pubmed
  11. Brenner B, Sarig G, Weiner Z, Younis J, Blumenfeld Z, Lanir N. Thrombophilic polymorphisms are common in women with fetal loss without apparent cause. Thromb Haemost. 1999;82(1):6-9.
    pubmed
  12. D'Uva M, Di Micco, Strina I, Ranieri A, Alviggi C, Mollo A, Fabozzi F, et al. Etiology of hypercoagulable state in women with recurrent fetal loss without other causes of miscarriage from Southern Italy: new clinical target for antithrombotic therapy. Biologics. 2008;2(4):897-902.
    pubmed
  13. Martinelli I. Risk factors in venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86(1):395-403.
    pubmed
  14. Franchini M, Veneri D. Inherited thrombophilia: an update. Clin Lab. 2005;51(7-8):357-365.
    pubmed
  15. Pickering W, Marriott K, Regan L. G20210A prothrombin gene mutation: prevalence in a recurrent miscarriage population. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2001;7(1):25-28.
    pubmed
  16. Pihusch R, Buchholz T, Lohse P, Rubsamen H, Rogenhofer N, Hasbargen U, Hiller E, et al. Thrombophilic gene mutations and recurrent spontaneous abortion: prothrombin mutation increases the risk in the first trimester. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2001;46(2):124-131.
    pubmed
  17. Finan RR, Tamim H, Ameen G, Sharida HE, Rashid M, Almawi WY. Prevalence of factor V G1691A (factor V-Leiden) and prothrombin G20210A gene mutations in a recurrent miscarriage population. Am J Hematol. 2002;71(4):300-305.
    pubmed
  18. Reznikoff-Etievan MF, Cayol V, Carbonne B, Robert A, Coulet F, Milliez J. Factor V Leiden and G20210A prothrombin mutations are risk factors for very early recurrent miscarriage. BJOG. 2001;108(12):1251-1254.
    pubmed
  19. Martinelli I, Taioli E, Cetin I, Marinoni A, Gerosa S, Villa MV, Bozzo M, et al. Mutations in coagulation factors in women with unexplained late fetal loss. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(14):1015-1018.
    pubmed
  20. Rai R, Shlebak A, Cohen H, Backos M, Holmes Z, Marriott K, Regan L. Factor V Leiden and acquired activated protein C resistance among 1000 women with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(5):961-965.
    pubmed
  21. Grandone E, Margaglione M, Colaizzo D, d'Addedda M, Cappucci G, Vecchione G, Scianname N, et al. Factor V Leiden is associated with repeated and recurrent unexplained fetal losses. Thromb Haemost. 1997;77(5):822-824.
    pubmed
  22. Hatzis T, Cardamakis E, Drivalas E, Makatsoris K, Bevan D, Pantos C, Malliopoulou V, et al. Increased resistance to activated protein C and factor V Leiden in recurrent abortions. Review of other hypercoagulability factors. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 1999;4(3):135-144.
    pubmed
  23. Ridker PM, Miletich JP, Buring JE, Ariyo AA, Price DT, Manson JE, Hill JA. Factor V Leiden mutation as a risk factor for recurrent pregnancy loss. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(12 Pt 1):1000-1003.
    pubmed
  24. Pabinger I, Nemes L, Rintelen C, Koder S, Lechler E, Loreth RM, Kyrle PA, et al. Pregnancy-associated risk for venous thromboembolism and pregnancy outcome in women homozygous for factor V Leiden. Hematol J. 2000;1(1):37-41.
    pubmed
  25. Sanson BJ, Friederich PW, Simioni P, Zanardi S, Hilsman MV, Girolami A, ten Cate, et al. The risk of abortion and stillbirth in antithrombin-, protein C-, and protein S-deficient women. Thromb Haemost. 1996;75(3):387-388.
    pubmed
  26. ten Kate MK, van der Meer J. Protein S deficiency: a clinical perspective. Haemophilia. 2008;14(6):1222-1228.
    pubmed
  27. Goodman CS, Coulam CB, Jeyendran RS, Acosta VA, Roussev R. Which thrombophilic gene mutations are risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss? Am J Reprod Immunol. 2006;56(4):230-236.
    pubmed
  28. Coulam CB, Jeyendran RS, Fishel LA, Roussev R. Multiple thrombophilic gene mutations rather than specific gene mutations are risk factors for recurrent miscarriage. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2006;55(5):360-368.
    pubmed
  29. Coulam CB, Wallis D, Weinstein J, DasGupta DS, Jeyendran RS. Comparison of thrombophilic gene mutations among patients experiencing recurrent miscarriage and deep vein thrombosis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2008;60(5):426-431.
    pubmed
  30. Fatini C, Gensini F, Battaglini B, Prisco D, Cellai AP, Fedi S, Marcucci R, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme DD genotype, angiotensin type 1 receptor CC genotype, and hyperhomocysteinemia increase first-trimester fetal-loss susceptibility. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2000;11(7):657-662.
    pubmed
  31. Lissak A, Sharon A, Fruchter O, Kassel A, Sanderovitz J, Abramovici H. Polymorphism for mutation of cytosine to thymine at location 677 in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene is associated with recurrent early fetal loss. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(1):126-130.
    pubmed
  32. Nelen WL, van der, Blom HJ, Heil SG, Steegers EA, Eskes TK. Recurrent early pregnancy loss and genetic-related disturbances in folate and homocysteine metabolism. Br J Hosp Med. 1997;58(10):511-513.
    pubmed
  33. Wouters MG, Boers GH, Blom HJ, Trijbels FJ, Thomas CM, Borm GF, Steegers-Theunissen RP, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia: a risk factor in women with unexplained recurrent early pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(5):820-825.
    pubmed
  34. Makino A, Nakanishi T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Suzumori N, Suzumori K. No association of C677T methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and an endothelial nitric oxide synthase polymorphism with recurrent pregnancy loss. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2004;52(1):60-66.
    pubmed
  35. Nadir Y, Hoffman R, Brenner B. Association of homocysteine, vitamin B12, folic acid, and MTHFR C677T in patients with a thrombotic event or recurrent fetal loss. Ann Hematol. 2007;86(1):35-40.
    pubmed
  36. Noble LS, Kutteh WH, Lashey N, Franklin RD, Herrada J. Antiphospholipid antibodies associated with recurrent pregnancy loss: prospective, multicenter, controlled pilot study comparing treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin versus unfractionated heparin. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(3):684-690.
    pubmed
  37. Infante-Rivard C, David M, Gauthier R, Rivard GE. Lupus anticoagulants, anticardiolipin antibodies, and fetal loss. A case-control study. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(15):1063-1066.
    pubmed
  38. Higashino M, Takakuwa K, Arakawa M, Tamura M, Yasuda M, Tanaka K. Anti-cardiolipin antibody and anti-cardiolipin beta-2-glycoprotein I antibody in patients with recurrent fetal miscarriage. J Perinat Med. 1998;26(5):384-389.
    pubmed
  39. Chakrabarti S, Bhunia C, Bhattacharya DK. The prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in cases of recurrent pregnancy loss. J Assoc Physicians India. 1999;47(5):496-498.
    pubmed
  40. Das I, Vasishta K, Dash S. Study of lupus anticoagulant in pregnant women with recurrent abortion. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;31(4):323-326.
    pubmed
  41. Asherson RA, Cervera R. 'Primary', 'secondary' and other variants of the antiphospholipid syndrome. Lupus. 1994;3(4):293-298.
    pubmed
  42. Ogasawara M, Aoki K, Matsuura E, Sasa H, Yagami Y. Anti beta 2glycoprotein I antibodies and lupus anticoagulant in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss: prevalence and clinical significance. Lupus. 1996;5(6):587-592.
    pubmed
  43. De Carolis S, Caruso A, Ferrazzani S, Carducci B, De Santis L, Mancuso S. Poor pregnancy outcome and anticardiolipin antibodies. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1994;9(5):296-299.
    pubmed
  44. Blumenfeld Z, Weiner Z, Lorber M, Sujov P, Thaler I. Anticardiolipin antibodies in patients with recurrent pregnancy wastage: treatment and uterine blood flow. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78(4):584-589.
    pubmed
  45. Brown HL. Antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent pregnancy loss. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1991;34(1):17-26.
    pubmed
  46. Carmo-Pereira S, Bertolaccini ML, Escudero-Contreras A, Khamashta MA, Hughes GR. Value of IgA anticardiolipin and anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibody testing in patients with pregnancy morbidity. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62(6):540-543.
    pubmed
  47. Nishiguchi T, Kobayashi T. Antiphospholipid syndrome: characteristics and obstetrical management. Curr Drug Targets. 2005;6(5):593-605.
    pubmed
  48. Zammiti W, Mtiraoui N, Kallel C, Mercier E, Almawi WY, Mahjoub T. A case-control study on the association of idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss with autoantibodies against beta2-glycoprotein I and annexin V. Reproduction. 2006;131(4):817-822.
    pubmed
  49. Wilson WA, Gharavi AE, Koike T, Lockshin MD, Branch DW, Piette JC, Brey R, et al. International consensus statement on preliminary classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome: report of an international workshop. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(7):1309-1311.
    pubmed
  50. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, Derksen RH, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4(2):295-306.
    pubmed
  51. Jones DW, MacKie IJ, Gallimore MJ, Winter M. Antibodies to factor XII and recurrent fetal loss in patients with the anti-phospholipid syndrome. Br J Haematol. 2001;113(2):550-552.
    pubmed
  52. D'Uva M, Strina I, Mollo A, Ranieri A, De Placido, Di Micco. Acquired factor XII deficiency in a woman with recurrent pregnancy loss: working on a differential diagnosis in a single case. J Transl Med. 2005;3(43):
    pubmed
  53. Dossenbach-Glaninger A, van Trotsenburg, Krugluger W, Dossenbach MR, Oberkanins C, Huber J, Hopmeier P. Elevated coagulation factor VIII and the risk for recurrent early pregnancy loss. Thromb Haemost. 2004;91(4):694-699.
    pubmed
  54. Tal J, Schliamser LM, Leibovitz Z, Ohel G, Attias D. A possible role for activated protein C resistance in patients with first and second trimester pregnancy failure. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(6):1624-1627.
    pubmed
  55. Gris JC, Quere I, Monpeyroux F, Mercier E, Ripart-Neveu S, Tailland ML, Hoffet M, et al. Case-control study of the frequency of thrombophilic disorders in couples with late foetal loss and no thrombotic antecedent--the Nimes Obstetricians and Haematologists Study5 (NOHA5). Thromb Haemost. 1999;81(6):891-899.
    pubmed
  56. Marquard K, Westphal LM, Milki AA, Lathi RB. Etiology of recurrent pregnancy loss in women over the age of 35 years. Fertil Steril. 2009;
    pubmed


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Clinical Medicine Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, monthly, ISSN 1918-3003 (print), 1918-3011 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jocmr.org   editorial contact: editor@jocmr.org     elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.