J Clin Med Res
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 7, Number 5, May 2015, pages 319-323

Evaluation of Maternal-Fetal Outcomes After Emergency Vaginal Cerclage Performed With Shirodkar-McDonald Combined Modified Technique

Leonarda Cianciminoa, Antonio Simone Laganàa, b, Giovanna Imbesia, Benito Chiofaloa, Alfredo Mancusoa, Onofrio Trioloa

aDepartment of Pediatric, Gynecological, Microbiological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Messina, Via C. Valeria 1, 98125 Messina, Italy
bCorresponding Author: Antonio Simone Laganà, Department of Pediatric, Gynecological, Microbiological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Messina, Via C. Valeria 1, 98125 Messina, Italy

Manuscript accepted for publication February 10, 2015
Short title: Emergency Vaginal Cerclage
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2108w


Background: Several techniques of emergency vaginal cerclage have been proposed in case of unexpected and abrupt cervical incompetence (CI), in order to prolong the pregnancy as much as possible and to reduce the adverse maternal-fetal outcomes. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of emergency cervical cerclage, performed with the combined modified Shirodkar-McDonald technique.

Methods: We selected 12 cases of emergency vaginal cerclage, performed between January 1, 2008 and June 30, 2013. The age of the patients was between 20 and 38 years (mean 29.0 ± standard deviation (SD) 5.69), parity between 0 and 2 (mean 0.7 ± SD 0.65), and gestational age at the time of admission ranged between 17 and 26 weeks (mean 21.0 ± SD 3.44). In all these cases, we used a combined modified Shirodkar-McDonald technique to perform the procedure.

Results: The neonatal survival rate was 83.3%. The cesarean section rate was 16.7%. The average pregnancy prolongation was 89.9 days, higher than that reported for other studies in the literature.

Conclusions: We can assume that the emergency vaginal cerclage performed with the combined modified Shirodkar-McDonald technique is the best option of surgical therapy for the treatment of unexpected and abrupt CI.

Keywords: Cervical incompetence; Emergency vaginal cerclage; Maternal-fetal outcomes; McDonald; Shirodkar


During the second trimester of pregnancy, the dilation of the cervix with prolapse of the lower pole of the membranes into the vagina causes, in most of cases, abortion or preterm delivery (PTD). This condition, defined as cervical incompetence (CI), is often characterized by a positive anamnesis for recurrent abortion in the second trimester or PTD at the beginning of the third trimester, subsequent to asymptomatic dilation of the cervix with prolapse of lower pole of the gestational sac into the vagina, even in the absence of an appreciable myometrial contractile activity [1]. In these cases, the prognosis for the fetus is in most cases unfavorable, and therefore is strongly indicated every possible attempt to prolong the pregnancy as much as possible [2]. In 1948, Palmer and La Comme [3] provided an extensive description of this condition, and in the following years several surgical techniques were developed for its treatment either with vaginal approach [4, 5], and, in special in particular cases, also with transabdominal one [6]. Although the cervical cerclage is worldwide performed since many years, data from literature are not completely exhaustive on its real efficacy for the prevention of PTD, except in certain clinical situations [7, 8]. In particular, accumulating evidence suggests that cervical cerclage provides clear and real benefits only in cases identified as CI (three or more previous late miscarriages or PTD). In these cases, the cervical cerclage in the first half of pregnancy has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of PTD [9, 10]. Moreover, in cases with a significant reduction in the length of the uterine cervix, the neonatal survival rate after successful cervical cerclage is greater than 93%, compared to 23% observed in cases without the procedure [11]. The essential question is represented by the fact that the diagnosis of CI is not still completely delineated, due to the lack of unique and objective diagnostic criteria; therefore, the results of the cervical cerclage procedures are unsatisfactory, since data collected from randomized controlled trials did not show a clear significant improvement of maternal-fetal outcomes [12-14]. From surgical standpoint, the vaginal cerclage procedure is considerably more advantageous than the transabdominal one, because it is shorter, less invasive, less difficult to perform, needs a short-term hospitalization and does not require a cesarean section at the end of pregnancy. From a strictly technical point of view, the passage of the tape within the cervical tissue can be performed in three different ways. The first way provides the passage of the tape through the entire circumference of the cervix, as described by Shirodkar [4]; in the second procedure the tape is placed through a series of small steps around the cervix, like a “tobacco bag” suture, as described by McDonald [5]. The third method provides to place the tape with four passes (four steps) in the thickness of the uterine cervix. While there are no statistically significant differences between vaginal cerclage performed with the Shirodkar or McDonald technique, it has been suggested that the four steps technique can be considered the most valid method. In fact, it is believed that the few but deep passages of the tape in the thickness of the cervical tissue can result in better grip and seal, and, therefore, have a lower tendency to dislocation, a greater resistance to dilation and a reduced risk of lacerations of the cervix in the case of myometrial contractile activity [2, 15]. In the current study, we used a combination of the Shirodkar and McDonald’s ones that in our opinion is faster and simpler to perform and holds better respect to other surgical procedures of cervical cerclage. Regarding the “timing” of cervical cerclage, we can distinguish four different clinical situations: the first is represented by the prophylactic cerclage, performed before conception; the second is the prophylactic cerclage too, but performed during pregnancy; the third is represented by the “emergency” cerclage, performed after a gradual shortening of the uterine cervix identified with vaginal exploration or transvaginal ultrasound; the fourth clinical situation is represented by “emergency” cerclage, characterized by a marked shortening and dilation of the uterine cervix, with prolapse of lower pole of the gestational sac into the vagina. The “emergency” cervical cerclage has been associated with a high risk of chorioamnionitis (about 40%) and rupture of the membranes (around 70%), both during the performing of the procedure and in the next 2 weeks, due to both the direct trauma of the procedure itself and to the contamination of the membranes after contact with the fluor vaginalis subsequent to cervical dilatation [12]. However, it is widely accepted that the monitoring of length and funneling of the uterine cervix cannot be considered, in high-risk cases, a valid and safe alternative to prophylactic cerclage. Some reports, although based on small cohort, seem to indicate that emergency cerclage associated with antibiotic therapy, tocolytic drug (ritodrine, atosiban, and progestagen) and bed rest may represent for the fetus a chance of survival over 96%, compared to 57% observed in cases where the procedure has not been performed [15, 16]. In light of these findings, the aim of our study was to evaluate the maternal-fetal outcomes after cervical cerclage, performed by the combined technique modified Shirodkar-McDonald.


This single center, observational case series is based on a retrospective analysis of all cases of cervical cerclage performed at the Department of Pediatric, Gynecological, Microbiological and Biomedical Sciences (University Hospital “G. Martino”, Messina, Italy), from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2013. We selected and enrolled only cases identified as “emergency” cervical cerclage. The study design is in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration [17], conforms the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines (http://publicationethics.org/) and was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the university hospital in which it was carried out. All the design, analysis, interpretation of data, drafting and revisions followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies [18], available through the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) network (http://www.equator-network.org/). Each enrolled patient was informed in a comprehensive and complete way about techniques that we were going to perform, and signed an informed consent for the two procedures and for the data collection for research purposes. All patients were admitted in our Ob/Gyn emergency unit. After the admission, we performed vaginal examination which identified significant shortening of the uterine cervix, with a dilation equal or greater than 3 cm and prolapse of the lower pole of the amniotic membrane into the vagina. Then, we immediately started administration of tocolytic drugs (ritodrine or atosiban), progestagen and broad spectrum antibiotics. After informing the patient of the clinical condition and risks, and after obtaining informed consent, we performed vaginal cervical cerclage, under general anesthesia. We placed the patient in the Trendelenburg position, and put the vaginal valves in order to see the uterine cervix, to evaluate its dilation and to check the integrity of amniotic membrane. Then, we prepared a regular Foley catheter (Charriere 16), adapted for this purpose by resection of the end a few millimeters above the balloon system in order to preserve its integrity; subsequently, we did endouterine replacement of the lower pole of the membranes above the internal uterine orifice level, according to the technique reported by many authors [19-21]. We tried to place the Mersilene tape as high as possible on the uterine cervix, using a combination of the Shirodkar and McDonald’s techniques, following described. Imagining the profile of the uterine cervix as clock, according to this technique the Mersilene tape crosses four times the cervical tissue: the first time enters at 12 and comes out at 6 o’clock; later on, the same tape enters again at 6 and comes out at 12 o’clock, ready to be tied with the other end. In our case series this technique was performed always by the same operator, in order to limit the intrinsic bias of an operator-dependent procedure. In the days following the surgery, the patient was kept in bed, in slight Trendelenburg position (in order to avoid excessive pressure on the uterine cervix), under tocolytic and broad-spectrum antibiotic infusion. Moreover, at the appropriate gestational age, we administered corticosteroid therapy for fetal lung maturity acceleration and reduction of respiratory distress at birth. In cases with regular course of pregnancy, the cerclage was kept in situ and removed at 35 - 36 weeks of gestational age, and subsequently the patient was then discharged waiting the beginning of spontaneous labor. In cases with infectious complications and/or onset or persistence of contractile uterine activity resistant to tocolytic therapy, we proceeded to the timely removal of cerclage, in order to avoid possible tears and consequent series serious bleeding events in the uterine cervix. Data for continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), whereas neonatal survival rate and cesarean section rate as percentages.


During the considered period, we selected and enrolled 12 cases, identified as “emergency” cervical cerclage. The age of the patients ranged between 20 and 38 years (mean 29.0 ± SD 5.69), parity between 0 and 2 (mean 0.7 ± SD 0.65), and gestational age at the time of admission between 17 and 26 weeks (mean 21.0 ± SD 3.44) (Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics of Enrolled Patients

Two patients were nulliparous and, therefore, without previous adverse obstetric events, but in one of them it had been previously diagnosed bicornuate uterus (defined according to the American Fertility Society classification [22]) by ultrasound. The pregnancy outcomes after the procedure, the type and gestational age of each delivery, and the perinatal outcomes are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Pregnancy Outcomes, Type and Gestational Age of Each Delivery, Perinatal Outcomes After Vaginal Cervical Cerclage Performed With Combined Modified Shirodkar-McDonald Technique

The periods between cervical cerclage and the end of the pregnancy ranged between 4 h (0.17 days) and 160 days (Table 3) [15, 23-27].

Table 3. Emergency Cervical Cerclage and Prolongation of the Pregnancy: Comparison With Other Studies in Literature

In the last case reported in Table 2 (case 12), the patient came to our observation with a uterine cervical shortening of 60-70% and a dilation of approximately 3 cm; a few hours after the surgery, severe uterine contractile activity occurred, refractory to treatment with atosiban and progestagen; therefore, about 4 h later, it became necessary to proceed with the timely removal of cerclage, in order to avoid possible laceration of cervix; soon after there was the rapid expulsion of the fetus, weighing 700 g, with Apgar index 3 - 7, immediately transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit of our hospital. In two patients (cases 5 and 10), the periods between the cerclage and the delivery were respectively 12 and 14 days and the prognosis was poor for both fetuses, born the first at 25 weeks and the second at 23 weeks of gestational age. In three patients there was the onset of uterine contractions and preterm birth occurred, two of them at 35 weeks (case 6 and case 11), the other at 30 weeks (case 8) of gestational age, all with good prognosis for the newborns. In the other six cases, the period between the cervical cerclage procedure and the delivery was higher, with the delivery occurring regularly between 39 and 40 weeks of gestational age. Four of these patients (cases 1, 2, 4 and 7) had a spontaneous delivery, in other two we had to perform cesarean section: one (case 9) for abnormal fetal presentation, the other (case 3) for intrauterine growth restriction and fetal suffering in labor. In all these six cases fetal conditions at birth were quite satisfactory (Apgar index between 8 and 10) and neonatal final prognosis was favorable. Altogether (Table 2) in the 12 patients of our study the average gestational age at the time of cervical cerclage was 20.9 weeks (ranging between 16.2 and 25.3 weeks), neonatal survival rate was 83.3%, and cesarean section rate was only 16.7%. The average pregnancy prolongation was 89.9 ± 58.30 days, higher than that reported for other studies in the literature (Table 3) [15, 23-27].


The identification of unexpected and abrupt CI in the second trimester of pregnancy is a very critical situation, configuring an important risk of adverse maternal-fetal outcome [28]. Numerous literature reports showed that in most cases this condition evolves within a short time, according to the weeks of gestation, in abortion or PTD [25, 29-31]. Since the fetal prognosis is strictly conditioned and dependent by the gestational age, every attempt possible to prolong the pregnancy is mandatory and must be proposed and pursued with the utmost determination. As previously evidenced, the emergency cerclage can be performed by using three vaginal currently standardized techniques in literature: Shirodkar, McDonald, four steps. In our case series we used a Shirodkar-McDonald combined modified technique that in our opinion is faster and simpler to perform and holds better respect to other surgical procedures of cervical cerclage; in fact, our technique results in higher prolongation of the pregnancy than that obtained by other authors (Table 3), without however causing particularly unfavorable maternal-fetal outcomes (Table 3). In addition, the number of cases in our study, although small, is comparable with the case series of other authors (Table 3). In conclusion, we can assume that the emergency vaginal cerclage performed with the combined modified Shirodkar-McDonald technique is a viable option of surgical therapy for the treatment of unexpected and abrupt CI. Nevertheless, there is still the need for future studies, on larger cohorts and with higher statistical power, to verify which of the techniques of vaginal cervical cerclage is more effective in emergency conditions, defining the most appropriate indications in relation to the characteristics of the patient, and considering the variability of maternal and fetal outcomes in the medium to long term on the basis of these parameters.

Declaration of Interest

All authors have no proprietary, financial, professional or other personal interest of any nature in any product, service or company. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

  1. Lotgering FK. Clinical aspects of cervical insufficiency. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007;7(Suppl 1):S17.
    doi pubmed
  2. Easterday CL, Reid DE. The incompetent cervix in repetitive abortion and premature labor. N Engl J Med. 1959;260(14):687-690.
    doi pubmed
  3. Palmer R, La Comme M. La beance de l'orifice uterine interne, cause d'avortements repetition? Une observation de dechirure cervico-isthmique reparee chirurgicalement, avec gestation a term consecutive. Gynecol Obstet. 1948;47:905-909.
  4. Shirodkar VN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic. 1955;52:299-302.
  5. McDonald IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957;64(3):346-350.
    doi pubmed
  6. Benson RC, Durfee RB. Transabdominal Cervico Uterine Cerclage during Pregnancy for the Treatment of Cervical Incompetency. Obstet Gynecol. 1965;25:145-155.
  7. Berghella V, Odibo AO, To MS, Rust OA, Althuisius SM. Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasonography: meta-analysis of trials using individual patient-level data. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(1):181-189.
    doi pubmed
  8. Hassan SS, Romero R, Maymon E, Berry SM, Blackwell SC, Treadwell MC, Tomlinson M. Does cervical cerclage prevent preterm delivery in patients with a short cervix? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(7):1325-1329; discussion 1329-1331.
    doi pubmed
  9. Rush RW, Isaacs S, McPherson K, Jones L, Chalmers I, Grant A. A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;91(8):724-730.
    doi pubmed
  10. Lazar P, Gueguen S, Dreyfus J, Renaud R, Pontonnier G, Papiernik E. Multicentred controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at moderate risk of preterm delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;91(8):731-735.
    doi pubmed
  11. Lotgering FK, Gaugler-Senden IP, Lotgering SF, Wallenburg HC. Outcome after transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(4):779-784.
    doi pubmed
  12. ACOG practice bulletin. Cervical insufficiency. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;85(1):81-89.
  13. Drakeley AJ, Roberts D, Alfirevic Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing pregnancy loss in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD003253.
    doi pubmed
  14. Obido AO, Berghella V, To MS, Rust OA, Althuisius SM, Nicolaides KH. Shirodkar versus McDonald cerclage for the prevention of cervical incompetence: a prospective study. Am J Perinatol. 2007;24(1):55-560.
    doi pubmed
  15. Daskalakis G, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Antsaklis A. Management of cervical insufficiency and bulging fetal membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(2 Pt 1):221-226.
    doi pubmed
  16. Debby A, Sadan O, Glezerman M, Golan A. Favorable outcome following emergency second trimester cerclage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;96(1):16-19.
    doi pubmed
  17. WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 64th WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013.
  18. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453-1457.
  19. Orr C. An aid to cervical cerclage. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1973;13(2):114.
    doi pubmed
  20. Didolkar SM. Foley catheter and cervical cerclage. Md Med J. 1986;35(10):846-847.
  21. Kanai M, Ashida T, Ohira S, Osada R, Konishi I. A new technique using a rubber balloon in emergency second trimester cerclage for fetal membrane prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008;34(6):935-940.
  22. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49(6):944-955.
  23. Ochi M, Ishikawa K, Itoh H, Miwa S, Fujimura Y, Kimura T, Ishizuka T, et al. [Aggressive management of prolapsed fetal membranes earlier than 26 weeks' gestation by emergent McDonald cerclage combined with amniocentesis and bladder overfilling]. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1994;46(4):301-307.
  24. Artmann A, Schuchardt R, Gnirs J, Schelling M, Schneider KT. [Total cervix occlusion--an efficient measure in prolapsed amniotic membranes in extreme prematurity?]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2001;205(4):143-146.
    doi pubmed
  25. Ishikawa K, Watanabe H, Tadokoro N, Oshima K, Nishikawa M, Inaba N. Outcome of prolapsed chorioamniotic membrane: relationship between the degree of herniation, infection, and pregnancy prolongation. Am J Perinatol. 2003;20(7):381-389.
    doi pubmed
  26. Althuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, van Geijn HP. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: emergency cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(4):907-910.
  27. Makino Y, Makino I, Tsujioka H, Kawarabayashi T. Amnioreduction in patients with bulging prolapsed membranes out of the cervix and vaginal orifice in cervical cerclage. J Perinat Med. 2004;32(2):140-148.
    doi pubmed
  28. Iams JD. Cervical incompetence. In: Creasy RK, Resnik R, eds. Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 4th ed. WB Saunders Company, 1999:445-464.
  29. Bulic M, Korenic B, Bjelajac P. [Pregnancy outcome in cervical cerclage with repositioning of prolapsed fetal membranes]. Jugosl Ginekol Opstet. 1980;20(3-4):213-216.
  30. Latta RA, McKenna B. Emergent cervical cerclage: predictors of success or failure. J Matern Fetal Med. 1996;5(1):22-27.
  31. Benham BN, Balducci J, Atlas RO, Rust OA. Risk factors for preterm delivery in patients demonstrating sonographic evidence of premature dilation of the internal os, prolapse of the membranes in the endocervical canal and shortening of the distal cervical segment by second trimester ultrasound. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;42(1):46-50.
    doi pubmed

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.


Browse  Journals  


Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics


World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology


Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity


Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research


Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics



Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, monthly, ISSN 1918-3003 (print), 1918-3011 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)

This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jocmr.org   editorial contact: editor@jocmr.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.