Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 16, Number 1, January 2024, pages 1-7


Use of a Novel Buffered Hypertonic Saline Solution for Fluid Replacement and Resuscitation During Spinal Surgery in Adolescents

Tables

Table 1. Demographic Data of the Study Groups
 
VariablesHypertonic saline (n = 23)Control group (n = 25)Entire cohort (n = 48)
Data are listed as the mean ± SD (range) or number (%). There were no statistically significant differences among the groups. SD: standard deviation.
Age (years)15.4 ± 1.9 (11.5 - 19.0)14.9 ± 1.9 (12.4 - 19.7)15.1 ± 1.9 (11.5 - 19.6)
Gender (female/male)17/619/636/12
Weight (kg)60.0 ± 17.3 (34.3 - 97.3)63.1 ± 30.8 (33.2 - 173.6)61.6 ± 25.0 (33.2 - 173.6)
Height (cm)160.3 ± 24.0 (58.2 - 179.3)155.3 ± 22.2 (57.7 - 177.5)157.7 ± 22.9 (57.7 - 179.3)
Ethnicity
  Hispanic1 (4%)01 (2%)
  Non-Hispanic22 (96%)25 (100%)47 (98%)
Race
  Caucasian18 (78%)18 (72%)36 (75%)
  African American3 (13%)4 (16%)7 (15%)
  Asian1 (4%)1 (4%)2 (4%)
  Multi-racial0 (0%)1 (4%)1 (2%)
  Other1 (4%)1 (4%)2 (4%)

 

Table 2. Intraoperative Anesthetic and Surgical Data
 
VariableHypertonic saline (n = 23)Control (n = 25)Entire cohort (n = 48)
Data are listed as the mean ± SD (range) or the number (%). There were no statistical differences between the two groups. SD: standard deviation.
Osteotomy performed (yes/no)17 (74%)/616 (64%)/933 (69%)/15
Total anesthesia time (min)398 ± 79 (271 - 519)370 ± 48 (270 - 459)383 ± 60 (270 - 519)
Total surgical time (min)282 ± 66 (180 - 409)251 ± 45 (159 - 336)265 ± 58 (159 - 409)
Urine output (mL)619 ± 415 (110 - 1,655)504 ± 343 (110 - 1,500)559 ± 380 (110 - 1,655)
Estimated blood loss (mL)411 ± 290 (50 - 1,200.00)523 ± 225 (150 - 1,100)471 ± 261 (50 - 1,200)

 

Table 3. Intraoperative Fluid Administration
 
FluidsHypertonic saline (n = 23)Control (n = 25)Entire cohort (n = 48)P value*
Data are listed as the mean ± SD (range) or the number (%). *P value for hypertonic saline versus control group. aVolume of albumin administered is calculated using a denominator of 23 in the hypertonic saline cohort and 25 in the control cohort. Volumes were equivalent if the calculation is completed using only those patients that received albumin (333 ± 129 mL in the 2% buffered hypertonic saline cohort versus 487 ± 195 mL in the control cohort). bVolume of crystalloid includes all intraoperative fluids including normal saline, lactated Ringer’s, and Normosol®-R. SD: standard deviation.
Albumin used (number and %)6 (26%)19 (76%)25 (52%)0.0005
Volume of albumin (mL)a91 ± 164 (0 - 500)370 ± 271 (0 - 1,000)-< 0.0001
Crystalloid fluids (mL)b1,484 ± 678 (320 - 3,113)1,652 ± 522 (645 - 2,535)1,571 ± 602 (320 - 3,113)0.3392
2% hypertonic saline (mL)646 ± 402 (233 - 2,000)---

 

Table 4. Intraoperative Laboratory Values
 
VariablesHypertonic saline (n = 23)Control (n = 25)P-value*
Data are listed as the mean ± SD. *P value for hypertonic saline versus control group. SD: standard deviation.
First hemoglobin (g/dL)11.3 ± 2.811.6 ± 1.2NS
Last hemoglobin (g/dL)11.4 ± 1.49.9 ± 1.70.0042
First hematocrit (%)35.7 ± 5.635 ± 3NS
Last hematocrit (%)33.2 ± 8.530 ± 5NS
First pH7.43 ± 0.047.41 ± 0.04NS
Last pH7.40 ± 0.037.36 ± 0.060.0131
First PaCO2 (mm Hg)38 ± 438 ± 4NS
Last PaCO2 (mm Hg)41 ± 441 ± 6NS
First base deficit1.3 ± 1.21.0 ± 1.0NS
Last base deficit2.1 ± 4.52.6 ± 2.1NS
First sodium (mEq/L)141 ± 2139 ± 20.0008
Last sodium (mEq/L)143 ± 3141 ± 30.0061