Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.jocmr.org

Short Communication

Volume 15, Number 8-9, September 2023, pages 423-429


Computer-Aided Pulmonary Fibrosis Detection Leveraging an Advanced Artificial Intelligence Triage and Notification Software

Figure

Figure 1.
Figure 1. ScreenDx-LungFibrosis™ analysis algorithm. (a) ScreenDx-LungFibrosis™ supervised training: The analysis algorithm receives volumetric CT input normalized to standardized pixel values (1) from thousands of labeled cases (i.e., positive or negative for PF). It is then trained (2) using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) that incorporates thousands of features via hidden layers (3) into the network. Algorithm output (4) is compared to the “truth”, established by the labeled cases, and feeds back into the model to optimize layer weights. (b) ScreenDx-LungFibrosis™ evaluation of new cases. The analysis algorithm receives volumetric CT input normalized to standardized pixel values (1) from new cases, which proceed through pre-trained hidden layers (2) with fixed weights per layer (3) to create a binary output (4) of 0 (no signs of PF) or 1 (suspicious for PF). PF: pulmonary fibrosis; CT: computed tomography.

Tables

Table 1. Baseline Cohort Characteristics
 
CharacteristicPF (n = 692)No PF (n = 2,326)Total (n = 3,018)P value
aRace and ethnicity data were available in 1,662 (38.5%) of patients. bBMI data were available in 52% of patients. cOther ILDs include bronchiolitis, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, connective tissue disease-associated ILD, desquamative interstitial pneumonia, eosinophilia granulomatosis with polyangiitis, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, sarcoidosis, pneumoconiosis, and vasculitis. Note: patients could have multiple primary diagnoses, so column total will not equal 100%. BMI: body mass index; PF: pulmonary fibrosis; IPF: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; ILD: interstitial lung disease; CT: computed tomography; ICD: International Classification of Diseases; COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; IQR: interquartile range.
Age (years), median (IQR)69.9 (63.0 - 74.0)63.2 (58.3 - 71.0)65.0 (58 - 72)< 0.001
Age (years), n (%)
  ≤ 401 (0.1)106 (4.6)107 (3.5)-
  41 - 5016 (2.3)80 (3.4)96 (3.2)0.02
  51-6086 (12.4)591 (25.4)677 (22.4)0.69
  61-70254 (36.7)647 (27.8)901 (29.8)< 0.001
  > 70326 (47.1)453 (19.5)779 (25.7)0.06
Male, n (%)519 (75.0)1,678 (55.5)1,678 (55.5)0.14
Racea
  White117 (92.1)1,294 (85.2)1,411 (85.8)0.03
  Black15 (3.9)147 (9.7)152 (9.2)0.44
  Asian2 (1.6)46 (3.0)48 (2.9)0.35
  Multi1 (0.8)22 (1.5)23 (1.4)0.54
  Hawaiian/Islander0 (0.0)8 (0.5)8 (0.5)0.41
  American Indian2 (1.6)1 (< 0.1)3 (0.2)< 0.001
Ethnicitya
  Hispanic14 (10.4)59 (3.9)73 (4.4)< 0.001
Tobacco use, n (%)469 (67.7)1,396 (60.0)1,865 (61.8)< 0.001
BMI, median (IQR)b28.0 (25.4 - 31.4)27.3 (24.2 - 30.7)27.3 (24.3 - 30.8)0.01
Primary diagnoses, n (%)
  PF692 (100.0)-692 (22.9)
  Normal scan-1,072 (35.5)1,072 (35.5)
  Cancer-429 (14.2)429 (14.2)
  COVID-19-371 (12.3)371 (12.3)
  Emphysema-204 (6.8)204 (6.8)
  ILD692 (100.0)63 (2.7)755 (25.1)
    IPF562 (81.2)0 (0.0)562 (74.4)
    Other ILDsc130 (18.8)63 (100.0)193 (25.6)
  Other-93 (4.0)93 (3.1)
  Pneumonia-52 (1.7)52 (1.7)
  Granulomatous disease-42 (1.4)42 (1.4)
Method of diagnosis, n (%)
  Multi-disciplinary discussion (MDD)437 (63.2)533 (22.9)970 (32.1)
  Site-reported diagnosis (clinical or ICD codes)255 (36.8)1,793 (77.1)2,048 (67.9)
CT slice thickness (mm), average (max)1.6 (5.0)2.4 (5.0)2.2 (5.0)< 0.001

 

Table 2. Diagnostic Parameters of ScreenDx-LungFibrosis™
 
Test parameterValue95% confidence interval
LR: likelihood ratio; OR: odds ratio; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value.
Sensitivity (%)91.389.0 - 93.3
Specificity (%)95.194.2 - 96.0
LR+18.815.8 - 22.9
LR-0.090.07 - 0.11
OR206.3149.0 - 285.6
PPV (%)84.882.1 - 87.3
NPV (%)97.496.6 - 98.0
PPV at low (10%) prevalence of PF (%)68.061.0 - 74.0
NPV at low (10%) prevalence of PF (%)99.098.0 - 100.0
PPV at high (50%) prevalence of PF (%)95.093.0 - 96.0
NPV at high (50%) prevalence of PF (%)92.089.0 - 93.0
Processing time (s), mean27.626.0 - 29.1