Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 15, Number 6, June 2023, pages 321-327


Nutritional Interpretation of Hospital Diets for Elderly Patients With Chronic Diseases and Analysis of Factors Influencing Actual Intakes

Figure

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Scheme for subject recruitment and study workflow.

Tables

Table 1. Demographics
 
Demographics
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Inside is quartile. The main causes for admission included chronic heart failure, bronchial pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type 2 diabetes; however, these conditions had been treated in the acute care hospital. Thus, patients’ conditions became stable. The perceived nutritional intake is calculated basis of the diet history questionnaire. aρ < -0.001, P = 0.999. bρ = 0.089, P = 0.535. cρ = 0.056, P = 0.709 (Spearman rank correlation). Alb: serum albumin; NPC/N: nonprotein calorie/nitrogen.
Number of patients (male/female)51 (36/15)
Age (years)77.7 ± 9.5(68.5 - 85.0)
Body mass index (kg/m2)20.6 ± 4.4(16.9 - 23.9)
Alb (g/dL)3.3 ± 0.6(2.9 - 3.8)
Perceived nutritional intake
  Energy (kcal)1,157 ± 344a(959 - 1,316)
  Protein (g)47.2 ± 16.9b(36.6 - 53.8)
  NPC/N132.6 ± 29.3c(109.3 - 149.4)
Actual nutritional intake
  Energy (kcal)1,402 ± 281a(1,269 - 1,631)
  Protein (g)60.2 ± 9.3b(55.8 - 66.0)
  NPC/N121.1 ± 25.2c(107.4 - 140.0)

 

Table 2. The Relationship Between Cosine Similarity and Each Item
 
ρ valueP value
N = 51 (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient). aThe relationship according to whether there is a difference with a normal diet or special therapeutic diet.
Sex0.2250.112
Age0.0630.662
Type of hospital meala0.1490.296
Body mass index0.0850.553
Alb-0.0320.827
Intake (staple food)-0.2420.087
Intake (side dish)-0.2120.135

 

Table 3. Comparison Between the High Awareness and the Low Awareness Group: Cosine Similarity Was Used to Stratify Each Group Based on the Mean Cosine Similarity
 
Group with low awareness of negative cosine similarityGroup with high awareness of positive cosine similarity
Small cosine similarity groupLarge cosine similarity groupP valueSmall cosine similarity groupLarge cosine similarity groupP value
Intake is defined as 1.00 when the whole meal is eaten. Inside is quartile. *P < 0.05 (Chi-squared test). ***P < 0.001 (Welch’s t test). Alb: serum albumin.
Number of patients (male/female)16 (14/2)9 (5/4)0.14212 (11/1)14 (6/8)0.014*
Age (years)80.0 (62 - 88)80.0 (63 - 90)0.77773.0 (59 - 92)80.5 (65 - 95)0.135
Body mass index (kg/m2)19.7 (15.2 - 25.8)20.9 (14.4 - 26.1)0.82120.3 (13.2 - 29.2)20.5 (13.4 - 31.8)0.662
Alb (g/dL)3.4 (2.0 - 4.1)3.5 (2.0 - 4.7)0.3323.4 (2.4 - 4.1)3.1 (2.4 - 4.1)0.245
Cosine similarity-0.84 (-0.98 - -0.76)-0.49 (-0.69 - -0.16)< 0.001***0.41 (0.14 - 0.62)0.90 (0.65 - 1.00)< 0.001***
Type of hospital meal (a normal diet or special therapeutic diet) (normal/special)16 (7/9)9 (0/9)0.027*12 (5/7)14 (3/11)0.401
Intake (staple food)1.00 (0.93 - 1.00)1.00 (0.58 - 1.00)0.1991.00 (0.66 - 1.00)0.99 (0.40 - 1.00)0.053
Intake (side dish)1.00 (0.86 - 1.00)0.96 (0.66 - 1.00)0.0961.00 (0.81 - 1.00)0.98 (0.54 - 1.00)0.074