Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 11, Number 7, July 2019, pages 501-508


Dexamethasone Injection Into Pterygomandibular Space Versus Sublingual Space on Post-Operative Sequalae of Lower Third Molar Intervention

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Types of impactions in the patients of this research study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Three reference lines for facial length measurement. A: lateral corner of eye to angle of mandible; B: corner of mouth to border of earlobe; C: soft tissue pogonion to border of earlobe.

Tables

Table 1. Eligibility Criteria Selection of the Patients
 
Inclusion criteria selection of the patients
The patient has bilateral impacted lower third molars symmetrically positioned on both sides of the mandible of which surgical removal consists of flap operation, bone removal, and tooth section
Aged between 18 - 45 years
No history of allergy to dexamethasone, amoxicillin, or acetaminophen
No use of other medicine 1 month before and during the study period
The patient is able to understand and carry out the instructions given by the investigators
The patient has provided their consent for the study
Exclusion criteria selection of the patients
Pregnancy or current lactation
Patients with cardiovascular problems, renal and/or liver failure, or other serious medical conditions
Allergic to local anesthetics and other drugs that were used in this study
Patient with facial deformities that may interfere with the injections, surgery or evaluation
The existence of acute infection and/or swelling and pain at the time of surgery
Patients taking any medication during the previous 1 month prior to the surgery
Inability to follow the instructions or cooperate during the study
Duration of treatment more than 1 h

 

Table 2. Demographic Data of Patients in Study Groups
 
Data consideration8 mg dexamethasoneTotalPercentage
Pterygomandibular space injectionSublingual space injection
Position A: the part of the lower third molar is above the occlusal plane of the lower second molar; Position B: the highest portion of the lower third molar is between the occlusal plane and the cervical line of the second molar; Class I: there is sufficient space of accommodation of the mesio-distal diameter of the lower third molar; Class II: the space of accommodation of the mesio-distal diameter of the lower third molar is less than the mesio-distal diameter of the lower third molar.
Number303060100
Age
  16 - 25 years28285693.3
  26 - 32 years2246.6
Sex
  Male13132643.3
  Female17173456.7
Position
  A991830
  B21214270
Class
  I12122440
  II18183660

 

Table 3. Duration of Mandibular Third Molar Intervention of the Patients in Study Groups
 
Data consideration8 mg dexamethasoneP value
Pterygomandibular space injection (SD)Sublingual space injection (SD)
Duration of operation (min)19.93 (2.71)20.50 (2.77)0.225

 

Table 4. Measurements of Post-Operative Pain (VAS in Millimeters and Number of Analgesic Taken in Number of Tablets) in Study Groups
 
Data evaluation8 mg dexamethasoneP value
Pterygomandibular space injection (SD)Sublingual space injection (SD)
Day 0: immediate after operation; Day 1: first day after operation; Day 2: second day after operation; Day 3: third day after operation; Day 7: seventh day after operation.
VAS
  Day 021.57 (15.76)20.90 (15.14)0.840
  Day 118.90 (14.96)17.03 (14.23)0.532
  Day 214.17 (15.45)13.90 (13.87)0.935
  Day 73.67 (10.15)3.60 (8.25)0.971
Number of analgesic taken
  Day 11.87 (1.04)1.77 (0.97)0.682
  Day 22.67 (1.82)2.53 (1.59)0.742
  Day 31.47 (1.47)1.10 (1.29)0.304

 

Table 5. Swelling Measurements and Differences in Millimeters From Baseline Value in Study Groups
 
Data evaluation8 mg dexamethasoneP value
Pterygomandibular space injection, mean (SD)Sublingual space injection, mean (SD)
Tr-Com: tragus-commissure of mouth; Tr-Pog: tragus-pogonion; Gn-Lc: goial angle-lateral canthal of eye.
Tr-Com
  Baseline115.10 (6.05)115.03 (6.12)0.326
  Second day118.83 (6.84)118.66 (6.01)0.724
  Seventh day116.56 (6.85)116.53 (6.22)0.926
Differences
  Second day-baseline3.73 (2.42)3.63 (2.44)0.835
  Seventh day-baseline1.46 (2.14)1.50 (1.50)0.926
Tr-Pog
  Baseline115.10 (6.05)115.03 (6.12)0.326
  Second day118.83 (6.84)118.66 (6.01)0.724
  Seventh day116.56 (6.85)116.53 (6.22)0.926
Differences
  Second day-baseline3.73 (2.42)3.63 (2.44)0.835
  Seventh day-baseline1.46 (2.14)1.50 (1.50)0.926
Gn-Lc
  Baseline106.86 (8.52)105.6 (7.92)0.99
  Second day110.83 (8.02)109.53 (7.65)0.177
  Seventh day108.56 (8.16)107.26 (7.77)0.115
Differences
  Second day-baseline3.96 (2.57)3.93 (2.11)0.954
  Seventh day-baseline1.7 (2.56)1.6 (2.13)0.897

 

Table 6. Measurements of Limited Mouth Opening and Differences in Millimeters From Baseline Value in the Study Groups
 
Maximum incisal distance8 mg dexamethasoneP value
Pterygomandibular space injection (SD)Sublingual space injection (SD)
*P < 0.01.
Baseline46.36 (5.03)46.36 (5.03)1
Second day33.83 (7.68)36.96 (5.49)0.004*
Seventh day42.61 (5.11)43.23 (4.88)0.293
Differences
  Baseline-second day12.53 (6.62)9.40 (5.11)0.004*
  Baseline-seventh day3.75 (3.74)3.13 (2.62)0.293

 

Table 7. The Summary of Previous Studies of Dexamethasone
 
AuthorsYearType of steroidAdministrationParameter measurementResults
NA: unknown; HRQOL: health-related quality of life; IV: intravenous.
Baxendale et al [15]19938 mg dexamethasoneOralPost-operative pain: 4 h post-operative reductionSignificant reduction in pain 4 h post-operatively
Tiwana et al [12]2005NA corticosteroids and without antibiotics, no corticosteroidsIntravenous before surgeryEffect on health-related quality of life outcomesIV corticosteroid administration had a limited, but beneficial effect on HRQOL outcomes
Grossi et al [6]20074 and 8 mg dexamethasoneSubmucosal injection before surgeryPost-operative edemaSignificant reduction when 4 mg dexamethasone was given, but 8 mg provided no further benefit
Filho et al [2]20084 and 8 mg dexamethasoneThe consumption of 4 mg versus 8 mg before surgerySwelling, trismus, painBetter for swelling and trismus but not effective for pain
Mojsa et al [8]20114 mg dexamethasone4 mg injection, the “before” group, placebo group, the “after” groupFacial swelling, post-operative pain, trismusBetter control of pain, swelling, trismus
Antonio et al [9]20118 mg dexamethasoneThe oral administration, local injection in the masseter musclePain, edema, limited mouth openingReducing post-operative pain, edema, trismus
Tiigimae-Saar et al [11]2011Single dose of 30 mg prednisolone, 120 mg etorikoxibPrednisolone immediate before operation, etorikoxib 30 min before operationPain, facial swelling, trismusWell-suited for treatment of post-operative pain, trismus, swelling, diminishing post-operative swelling of soft tissues
Chaurand-Lara and Facio-Umana [10]201320 mg of methylprednisoloneIntramuscular in masseter and no administerSwelling, painDecrease and an effective therapeutic reduction of swelling and pain
Bauer et al [14]2013NA ibuprofen or placebo, NA ibuprofen + dexamethasone, placeboPre-emptive analgesiaPost-operative painPre-emptive analgesia insufficient to inhibit central sensitization, association with dexamethasone more effective
Li et al [16]20134 mg and 8 mg dexamethasoneInjection of 4 - 5 mg in pericoronal injectionPost-operative swelling, trismusControl facial swelling, trismus
Latt et al [17]2016Dexamethasone 8 mg, saline groupPterygomandibular space injectionPost-operative painDecreased post-operative pain
Gozali et al [18]20178 mg dexamethasone, saline groupInjection into sublingual areaPost-operative painDecreased post-operative pain