Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 11, Number 7, July 2019, pages 495-500


Efficacy of Naftopidil as a Medical Expulsive Therapy in Japanese Men With Ureteral Stones: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Tables

Table 1. Patient Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes in the Four Treatment Groups
 
GroupP value
ABCD
Analgesics onlyQuercus salicina + flopropioneNaftopidilQuercus salicina + flopropione + naftopidil
The difference of each group compared with analgesic only group was shown in analyzed patients, patient age, stone size, stone location and duration of passage. *Analgesics only versus naftopidil group. NS: not significant; SD: standard deviation.
Randomized patients (n)125125125125
Withdrawal patients (n)38394444
  Self-withdrawal18181820
  Side effect1121
  Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy12131514
  Ureteral stent5676
  Hospital change1012
  Treatment of other diseases1111
Analyzed patients (n)87868181NS
Age, years, mean (SD)48.3 (12.5)45.7 (13.6)48.8 (10.9)45.9 (10.8)NS
Stone size, mm, mean (SD)5.1 (1.6)5.1 (1.9)5.1 (1.8)4.9 (1.9)NS
Stone location (n)
  Right/left40/4733/5342/3933/48NS
  Proximal27423333NS
  Middle6654NS
  Distal54384344NS
Duration of passage, days, mean (SD)20.0 (9.8)22.6 (9.3)16.8 (9.9)*17.8 (10.3)NS *0.040
  Proximal23.5 (8.7)25.2 (8.1)20.1 (10.4)19.5 (10.5)NS
  Middle27.3 (6.5)24.0 (9.4)24.2 (7.3)23.3 (7.3)NS
  Distal17.4 (9.7)19.5 (9.9)13.4 (8.6)*16.0 (10.2)NS *0.041

 

Table 2. Cox Proportional Hazards Model: Multivariate Analysis for the Probability of Overall Stone Expulsion in Each Ureteral Position
 
Hazard ratio95% CIP value
A: analgesics only. B: daily doses of 240 mg flopropione and 1,350 mg QS. C: daily dose of 50 mg naftopidil. D: daily dose of 240 mg flopropione, 1,350 mg QS and 50 mg naftopidil. CI: confidence interval; NS: not significant.
Whole ureter
  A vs. B0.6380.429 - 0.9480.0262
  A vs. C1.4261.000 - 2.0330.0497
  B vs. C2.1831.475 - 3.229< 0.0001
  A vs. D1.2670.886 - 1.814NS
  B vs. D1.9621.323 - 2.9100.0008
Proximal
  A vs. B0.7660.348 - 1.687NS
  A vs. C1.8050.870 - 3.746NS
  B vs. C2.4031.220 - 4.7330.0113
  A vs. D1.9150.928 - 3.953NS
  B vs. D2.5421.298 - 4.9790.0065
Middle
  A vs. B1.1580.163 - 8.238NS
  A vs. C2.2590.371 - 13.76NS
  B vs. C1.6500.275 - 9.906NS
  A vs. D3.2830.523 - 20.60NS
  B vs. D2.1700.360 - 13.08NS
Distal
  A vs. B0.7080.437 - 1.146NS
  A vs. C1.5551.013 - 2.3880.0440
  B vs. C2.0641.249 - 3.4090.0047
  A vs. D1.0820.699 - 1.675NS
  B vs. D1.4940.901 - 2.478NS

 

Table 3. Cox Proportional Hazards Model: Multivariate Analysis for the Probability of Expulsion of Stones < 6 mm in Each Ureteral Position
 
Hazard ratio95% CIP value
A: analgesics only. B: daily doses of 240 mg flopropione and 1,350 mg QS. C: daily dose of 50 mg naftopidil. D: daily dose of 240 mg flopropione, 1,350 mg QS and 50 mg naftopidil. CI: confidence interval; NS: not significant.
Whole ureter
  A vs. B0.7510.477 - 1.183NS
  A vs. C1.5701.039 - 2.3740.0329
  B vs. C2.0001.270 - 3.1500.0028
  A vs. D1.1450.759 - 1.727NS
  B vs. D1.5130.963 - 2.377NS
Proximal
  A vs. B0.7040.271 - 1.825NS
  A vs. C1.6170.707 - 3.698NS
  B vs. C2.3630.999 - 5.586NS
  A vs. D1.3850.622 - 3.085NS
  B vs. D2.0280.881 - 4.670NS
Distal
  A vs. B0.7750.453 - 1.328NS
  A vs. C1.7781.066 - 2.9650.0275
  B vs. C2.1051.190 - 3.7240.0105
  A vs. D1.1150.672 - 1.849NS
  B vs. D1.3960.793 - 2.456NS

 

Table 4. Cox Proportional Hazards Model: Multivariate Analysis for the Probability of Expulsion of Stones > 6 mm in Each Ureteral Position
 
Hazard ratio95% CIp value
A: analgesics only. B: daily doses of 240 mg flopropione and 1,350 mg QS. C: daily dose of 50 mg naftopidil. D: daily dose of 240 mg flopropione, 1,350 mg QS and 50 mg naftopidil. CI: confidence interval; NS: not significant.
Whole ureter
  A vs. B0.5140.228 - 1.159NS
  A vs. C1.3450.662 - 2.732NS
  B vs. C2.6211.197 - 5.7350.0159
  A vs. D1.5180.732 - 3.148NS
  B vs. D2.9611.325 - 6.6170.0081
Proximal
  A vs. B1.4650.296 - 7.261NS
  A vs. C2.6830.541 - 13.30NS
  B vs. C1.8940.610 - 5.881NS
  A vs. D2.8550.521 - 15.64NS
  B vs. D2.0070.565 - 7.133NS
Distal
  A vs. B0.4860.157 - 1.511NS
  A vs. C1.3160.564 - 3.073NS
  B vs. C2.6410.822 - 8.493NS
  A vs. D1.0090.425 - 2.400NS
  B vs. D2.1070.648 - 6.857NS