Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 11, Number 5, May 2019, pages 345-352


High Prevalence of Proarrhythmic Events in Patients With History of Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing a Rhythm Control Strategy: A Retrospective Study

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. The respective percentages of events of proarrhythmia, depending on the type of drug antiarrhythmic treatment for prophylaxis of AF relapses, are depicted (purple bars). AF: atrial fibrillation; IC: antiarrhythmics belonging to class IC of Vaughan Williams classification; BB: beta-blockers; amio: amiodarone; quin: hydroquinidine; dig: digoxin.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. The respective percentages of events of atrial proarrhythmia, depending on the type of drug antiarrhythmic treatment for prophylaxis of AF relapses, are reported (purple bars). The histograms refer to two atrial proarrhythmia events with important clinical correlates, namely the second- or third-degree sino-atrial block (left panel) and the atrial flutter with AV 1:1 conduction (right panel). AF: atrial fibrillation; AFL: atrial flutter; AV: atrioventricular; IC: antiarrhythmics belonging to class IC of Vaughan Williams classification; BB: beta-blockers; amio: amiodarone; quin: hydroquinidine; dig: digoxin.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. The respective percentages of torsades de pointes and type 2 second-degree AV block, depending on the type of drug antiarrhythmic treatment for prophylaxis of AF relapses, are represented (purple bars). All of the cases of type 2 second-degree AV block (n. 14) are attributable to IC + BB therapy. As regards the torsades de pointes the risk appears to be more pronounced when using hydroquinidine plus digoxin (33.3%) or sotalol (23.57%). AV: atrioventricular; IC: antiarrhythmics belonging to class IC of Vaughan Williams classification; BB: beta-blockers; amio: amiodarone; quin: hydroquinidine; dig: digoxin.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. The respective percentages of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachicardia, depending on the type of drug antiarrhythmic treatment for prophylaxis of AF recurrences, are highlighted (purple bars). This very dangerous arrhythmia has been found in IC + BB group (1.19% of the treated patients) and sotalol group (2.14%). For further considerations, please see the text.

Tables

Table 1. Vaughan Williams Classification, Comprising the Main Antiarrhythmic Medications
 
ClassKnown asExamplesMedical uses
IAFast-channel blockersQuinidine, ajmaline, procainamide, disopyramideVentricular arrhythmias, prevention of paroxysmal recurrent atrial fibrillation (triggered by vagaloveractivity), procainamide in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, all these drugs increase QT interval
IBLidocaine, mexiletine, tocainideTreatment and prevention during and immediately after myocardial infarction, though this practice is now discouraged given the increased risk of asystole; ventricular tachycardia
ICEncainide, flecainide, propafenone, moricizinePrevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, treatment of recurrent tachyarrhythmias of abnormal conduction system; these drugs are contraindicated immediately after myocardial infarction
IIBeta-blockersCarvedilol, propranolol, esmolol, timolol, metoprolol, atenolol, bisoprolol, nebivololReduction in myocardial infarction mortality, prevention of tachyarrythmia's recurrences, propranolol has sodium channel-blocking effects
IIIAmiodarone, sotalol, ibutilide, dofetilide, dronedaroneSotalol: ventricular tachycardias and atrial fibrillation; Ibutilide: atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation, amiodarone: prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and hemodynamically stable ventricular tachycardia
IVCalcium channel blockersVerapamil, diltiazemPrevention of recurrences of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, slowing-down of ventricular rate in patients with atrial fibrillation
VAdenosine, digoxin, magnesium sulfateUsed in supraventricular arrhythmias, especially in heart failure with atrial fibrillation, contraindicated in ventricular arrhythmias; or in the case of magnesium sulfate, used in torsades de pointes

 

Table 2. The Absolute Number of Cases for Each Paradoxical Arrhythmia Variety
 
On the whole, there are 182 cases of paradoxical arrhythmia (proarrhythmic events) plus 36 cases of iatrogenic intraventricular conduction delay, namely 23 cases of left bundle branch block and 13 cases of right bundle branch block caused by antiarrhythmic drugs, especially flecainide and quinidine.
Torsades de pointes: 56 cases
Slow atrial flutter with 1:1 AV conduction: 24 cases
Intermittent high grade AV block in patients with asymptomatic chronic bifascicular block: one case
Left bundle branch block: 23 cases
Right bundle branch block: 13 cases
Second-degree sino-atrial block type 1: five cases
Second-degree sino-atrial block type 2: 45 cases
Third-degree sino-atrial block: 31 cases
Type 2 (Mobitz II) second-degree AV block: 14 cases
Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia: six cases