Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 9, Number 6, June 2017, pages 476-481


Effect of Ezetimibe Monotherapy on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and on Markers of Cholesterol Synthesis and Absorption in Japanese Patients With Hypercholesterolemia

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Changes of the lipid profile in the E group and C group. Data are shown as the mean ± SE. BL: baseline. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. E group: ezetimibe treated group. C group: ezetimibe non-treated control group.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. (a, b) Correlation between changing rate of LDL-C and changing rate of cholesterol absorption markers from baseline to 12 weeks in the E group. (c, d) Correlation between changing rate of LDL-C from baseline to 12 weeks and the baseline levels of cholesterol absorption markers in the E group.

Tables

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the Patients
 
E groupC groupP-value
Results are expressed as the mean ± SE. E group: ezetimibe treated group. C group: ezetimibe non-treated control group. BMI: body mass index; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c: hemoglobin A1c; GA: glycated albumin; HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; RLP-C: remnant-like particles cholesterol.
Gender (male/female)44 (18:26)32 (17:15)0.35
Age (years)59.3 ± 2.162.6 ± 2.20.28
BMI (kg/m2)28.1 ± 1.127.4 ± 0.60.59
FPG (mg/dL)105 ± 3108 ± 40.53
HbA1c (%)5.5 ± 0.15.6 ± 0.10.68
AST (mg/dL)24.6 ± 1.522.3 ± 1.10.25
ALT (mg/dL)27.8 ± 3.424.8 ± 2.80.53
Creatinine (mg/dL)0.7 ± 0.00.7 ± 0.00.58
TG (mg/dL)150.7 ± 10.8141.3 ± 11.20.55
HDL-C (mg/dL)52.8 ± 1.354.1 ± 2.30.60
LDL-C (mg/dL)154.6 ± 3.9152.5 ± 3.70.71
RLP-C (mg/dL)7.3 ± 0.66.4 ± 0.50.28
Lathosterol (μg/mL)4.2 ± 0.34.2 ± 0.30.95
Campesterol (μg/mL)5.7 ± 0.45.6 ± 0.40.88
Sitosterol (μg/mL)3.2 ± 0.23.1 ± 0.20.65

 

Table 2. Comparison of the Changes in Serum Lipids and Cholesterol Absorption and Synthesis Markers
 
E groupP-value (vs. baseline)C groupP-value (vs. baseline)P-value (E group vs. C group at 12 weeks)
Baseline12 weeksBaseline12 weeks
Results are expressed as the mean ± SE. E group: ezetimibe treated group. C group: ezetimibe non-treated control group.
HDL-C (mg/dL)52.8 ± 1.354.7 ± 1.5< 0.0554.1 ± 2.355.0 ± 2.70.440.93
LDL-C (mg/dL)154.6 ± 3.9131.7 ± 3.9< 0.01152.5 ± 3.7147.2 ± 3.20.18< 0.01
TG (mg/dL)150.7 ± 10.8139.0 ± 7.40.20141.3 ± 11.2146.4 ± 12.50.610.60
RLP-C (mg/dL)7.3 ± 0.65.3 ± 0.3< 0.016.4 ± 0.56.5 ± 0.60.950.08
Lathosterol (μg/mL)4.2 ± 0.34.6 ± 0.2< 0.014.2 ± 0.34.5 ± 0.50.410.79
Campesterol (μg/mL)5.7 ± 0.43.1 ± 0.2< 0.015.6 ± 0.45.9 ± 0.40.36< 0.01
Sitosterol (μg/mL)3.2 ± 0.21.8 ± 0.1< 0.013.1 ± 0.23.3 ± 0.20.26< 0.01

 

Table 3. Comparison of Baseline Parameters Between the Ezetimibe High Responder Group and the Low Responder Group
 
High responder groupLow responder groupP-value
Results are expressed as the mean ± SE. High responder group: equal or more than 20 mg/dL LDL-C reduction. Low responder group: less than 20 mg/dL LDL-C reduction.
n1826
Age (years)61.8 ± 2.757.8 ± 2.90.36
BMI (kg/m2)27.0 ± 1.928.1 ± 1.50.41
FPG (mg/dL)102 ± 5106 ± 40.49
HDL-C (mg/dL)53.4 ± 2.052.3 ± 1.70.69
LDL-C (mg/dL)163.1 ± 4.0148.7 ± 5.70.07
RLP-C (mg/dL)6.8 ± 0.87.6 ± 0.80.49
Lathosterol (μg/mL)4.2 ± 0.34.2 ± 0.40.98
Campesterol (μg/mL)6.6 ± 0.75.1 ± 0.40.04
Sitosterol (μg/mL)3.8 ± 0.52.8 ± 0.20.04