Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 8, Number 7, July 2016, pages 513-518


Evaluation of the Sympathetic Skin Response to the Dry Needling Treatment in Female Myofascial Pain Syndrome Patients

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Amplitude value differences in patient group.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Latency value differences in patient group.

Tables

Table 1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
 
Inclusion criteria
  18 - 40 aged female
  Having regular menstrual cycle
  Duration of pain longer than 3 months (for patient group)
  Absence of any pain (for the control group)
Exclusion criteria
  Comorbid conditions that may affect sympathetic skin response answers such as (diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren’s syndrome, psoriasis and vitiligo, Behcet’s disease, Fabry disease, botulism, primary autoimmune hypothyroidism, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, central nervous system diseases, peripheral nervous system diseases, peripheral vascular disease, entrapment neuropathies)
  Patients taking antidepressant and anxiolytic drugs
  Surgical or chemical sympathectomy
  Major trauma or surgery history of head, neck and upper extremities
  Scar tissue located in neck, trapezius muscle or in upper extremities that are greater than 2 cm2 and longer than 2 cm
  Scoliosis greater than 10° which is detected in examination
  Significantly symptomatic (grade 3 and 4) cervical and dorsal spondylosis
  Cardiac pace-maker

 

Table 2. Evaluation of the Correlation Between Measurements in the Patient Group
 
SPerman’s
rho
ALISARISVASENRFVASENLFALGENRFALGENLFLRISLLISTNRFTNLF
ALIF: difference between initial and final amplitude measurements on left side; ARIF: difference between initial and final amplitude measurements on right side; VASMDR: the difference between highest VAS scores before and after treatment on the right side; VASMDL: the difference between highest VAS scores before and after treatment on the left side; ALGDR: the difference between lowest algometric values before and after treatment on the right side; ALGDL: the difference between lowest algometric values before and after treatment on the left side; LDR: the difference between first and last latency measurements on right side; LDL: the difference between first and last latency measurements on left side; TPDR: trigger point difference before and after treatment on right side; TPDL: trigger point difference before and after treatment on left side.
ALIFr = -0.372
P = 0.051
r = 0.427
P = 0.021*
r = -0.244
P = 0.202
ARIFr = -0.308
P = 0.104
r = 0.304
P = 0.109
r = -0.430
P = 0.020*
VASMDRr = -0.308
P = 0.104
r = -0.425
P = 0.022*
r = -0.284
P = 0.136
r = 0.302
P = 0.111
VASMDLr = -0.372
P = 0.051
r = -0.536
P = 0.003**
r = -0.427
P = 0.024*
r = 0.603
P = 0.001**
ALGDRr = 0.304
P = 0.109
r = -0.425
P = 0.022*
r = 0.153
P = 0.429
r = -0.276
P = 0.147
ALGDLr = 0.427
P = 0.021*
r = -0.536
P = 0.003**
r = 0.143
P = 0.459
r = -0.363
P = 0.053
LDRr = -0.284
P = 0.136
r = 0.153
P = 0.429
r = -0.286
P = 0.132
LDLr = -0.427
P = 0.024*
r = 0.143
P = 0.459
r = -0.121
P = 0.531
TPDRr = -0.430
P = 0.020*
r = 0.302
P = 0.111
r = -0.276
P = 0.147
r = -0.286
P = 0.132
TPDLr = -0.244
P = 0.202
r = 0.603
P = 0.001**
r = -0.363
P = 0.053
r = -0.121
P = 0.531