Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 5, Number 1, February 2013, pages 34-41


Nanoduct Sweat Conductivity Measurements in 2664 Patients: Relationship to Age, Arterial Blood Gas, Serum Electrolyte Profiles and Clinical Diagnosis

Figure

Figure 1.
Figure 1. A: the ROC curve for the 1st conductivity test; B: the ROC curve for the 2nd conductivity test.

Tables

Table 1. The Distribution of the Number of Patients was Based on the 1st and 2nd Conductivity Results, and the Numbers in Parantheses Represent the Cystic Fibrosis Patients Confirmed by the Sweat Chloride Measurements
 
2nd conductivity test (mmol/L)
3 - 60 Normal61 - 80 Intermediate> 80 Positive
3 - 60 Normal2,5883501 (1 CF)
1st conductivity test (mmol/L)61 - 80 Intermediate0176 (4 CF)1 (1 CF)
> 80 Positive04111 (11 CF)

 

Table 2. The Conductivity Measurements in Patients According to Age Groups
 
All Ages (n)0 - 6 months7 - 12 months13 - 24 months> 24 months
Male (n)Female (n)Male (n)Female (n)Male (n)Female (n)Male (n)Female (n)
Mean ± SD34.26 ± 10.3434.58 ± 14.3434.79 ± 11.4732.86 ± 9.8332.18 ± 8.4433.47 ± 8.7533.33 ± 8.1435.38 ± 10.0735.61 ± 9.15
1st conductivity test, mmol/L(2,664)(366)(206)(337)(204)(363)(227)(534)(427)
Min - Max5 - 13112 - 13110 - 915 - 11011 - 629 - 8012 - 587 - 1066 - 77
Mean ± SD48.74 ± 22.5552.41 ± 24.5445.86 ± 23.1132.86 ± 9.8327.67 ± 16.5644.88 ± 19.0854.80 ± 23.0541.12 ± 7.64
2nd conductivity test, mmol/L(76)(29)(14)(4)(3)(8)(0)(10)(8)
Min - max12 - 9917 - 9812 - 8731 - 9912 - 4524 - 8431 - 9832 - 51

 

Table 3. Different Conductivity Cut-off Values of the 1st and 2nd Tests to Predict the Cystic Fibrosis Diagnosis, According to the Number of Patients Confirmed by Sweat Chloride Measurements
 
Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Area Under Cure
1st conductivity test53 mmol/L1001000.647
P > 0.05
58 mmol/L94100
63 mmol/L88100
2nd conductivity test60 mmol/L1001001
P < 0.007
61.5 mmol/L10066

 

Table 4. The Distribution of Laboratory Values Based on Conductivity Results and the Results of the Patients Diagnosed With Cystic Fibrosis. A Comparison of laboratory Values Based on Normal, Intermediate and Positive Conductivity are Also Given (ANOVA)
 
3 - 60 mmol/L61 - 80 mmol/L> 80 mmol/LCF PatientsANOVA
NormalIntermediatePositive
(n: 509)(n: 9)(n: 7)(n: 17)FP
NaMean ± SD138.42 ± 3.75137.72 ± 3.80130.21 ± 5.64133.43 ± 6.217.1< 0.001
Median139137.5131134
Min - Max123 - 163131 - 142120 - 137118 - 142
KMean ± SD4.53 ± 0.714.45 ± 0.383.67 ± 0.564 ± 0.64.570.01
Median4.54.53.54.15
Min - Max2.3 - 7.33.9 - 5.23.1 - 4.53.1 - 4.7
ClMean ± SD103.29 ± 4.30102.96 ± 4.5288.43 ± 17.2393.9 ± 15.535.85< 0.001
Median10410388101
Min - Max80 - 13894 - 10964 - 10664 - 108
pHMean ± SD7.39 ± 0.77.39 ± 0.067.5 ± 0.127.47 ± 0.118.33< 0.001
Median7.397.397.517.45
Min - Max7.0 - 7.67.3 - 7.57.3 - 7.77.3 - 7.7
pCO2Mean ± SD37.35 ± 8.3136.31 ± 7.7738.21 ± 8.6837.96 ± 6.90.100.89
Median3638.540.440
Min - Max20.6 - 102.123.9 - 46.221 - 4823.9 - 48
HCO3Mean ± SD22.17 ± 4.3222 ± 3.8630.64 ± 14.5828.37 ± 12.811.98< 0.001
Median21.622.325.525.5
Min - Max9.6 - 43.415.6 - 27.617.6 - 5415.6 - 54