|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original Article | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blood Transfusion Practices in Total Joint Arthroplasties in Jamaica
Manuscript
accepted for publication December 15, 2009 Abstract Background: Major blood loss usually occurs in both hip and knee arthroplasty, frequently leading to the need for blood transfusion. This study was performed to determine blood transfusion rates and analyze the factors which affected the need for blood transfusion in patients who underwent primary unilateral total knee and hip arthroplasties at the University Hospital of the West Indies, Jamaica. Method: A prospective study of 118 patients who underwent unilateral total knee and total hip arthroplasties between January 2004 and July 2009 was undertaken. Data collected was analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2008, SPSS version 12 and Stata version 7.0. Results: Of the 118 patients, 90 (70%) were females. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 65.2 + 11.5 years (range 32 – 85 years). Osteoarthritis accounted for the majority (88%) of arthroplasties. Mean + SD estimated blood loss for all arthroplasties was 1195.0 + 855.6 ml (range 100 – 6000 ml). Mean + SD duration of surgery for all joint arthroplasties was 226.1 + 63.5 minutes (range 110 – 392 minutes). Mean ± SD preoperative hemoglobin was 12.09 g/dl (range 7.3 – 15.6 g/dl). Average body mass index was 28.9 kg/m2 (range 17.9 – 68.3 kg/m2). Seventy-five (64%) patients were transfused and of these, 44 patients received allogenic blood only; 20 patients received autologous blood only, and eleven patients received both allogenic and autologous blood. The overall blood transfusion rate was 63%.
Conclusion: In our study, the multivariate
analysis showed a significant relationship (p = 0.000) only between
postoperative transfusion and the estimated blood loss. Keywords: Blood transfusion practices; Total joint arthroplasties
Introduction Total knee and
hip arthroplasties are usually associated with significant blood
loss and many patients require perioperative transfusion [1, 2]. The
reported mean estimated blood loss is between 495 and 1,493ml per
procedure [3-5]. Allogenic transfusion is associated with a number
of problems, including the risk of transmission of infectious
diseases such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus and hepatitis, as well
as transfusion-related and allergic reactions [6-8]. In addition,
some patients refuse a blood transfusion because of religious
beliefs. In order to minimize the disadvantages of allogenic
transfusions, alternatives such as preoperative haemodilution,
anesthetic hypotension, intraoperative and postoperative blood
recovery, preoperative donation of blood, and human recombinant
erythropoietin, are currently being used [9-11]. Materials and Methods Between January 2004 and July 2009, 148 consecutive patients who underwent total knee and total hip arthroplasties by three orthopaedic surgeons at the University Hospital of the West Indies in Jamaica were prospectively studied. Patients were excluded from the study if they were undergoing total joint arthroplasty for a hip fracture; were undergoing revision surgery; had a hematological disease; were being treated with warfarin for anticoagulation; had liver impairment; had had gastro-intestinal bleeding; were undergoing simultaneous joint arthroplasties or received a transfusion in the preoperative period. There were seven bilateral total joint arthroplasties; 19 revisions; two patients with liver impairment, and two patients with a history of gastro-intestinal bleeding. The study population consisted of 118 unilateral primary total joint arthroplasties. There were ten patients each of whom underwent two procedures during the study. Informed consent was obtained from all of the patients. Of the ten patients, five patients each had two primary total knee arthroplasties; three patients each had two primary total hip arthroplasties, and two patients each had a primary total hip and primary total knee arthroplasty. The range of time between the procedures was seven days to 69 months. The following information was recorded for each patient; diagnosis, procedure, age, gender, body mass index (BMI), duration of surgery, preoperative hemoglobin, estimated blood loss, type of anesthesia, number of predonated autologous units of blood, number of patients transfused and the number of units of blood discarded. Data collected
was analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2008, SPSS version 12 and Stata
version 7.0. Descriptive statistics were generated as appropriate.
Student t-tests were used to compare average values for continuous
variables. Logistic regression models were also used to examine
which variables were predictive of the risk for post-surgery
transfusion. Statistical significance for all tests was set at 5%. Results Of the 118
patients, 90 (76%) were females. The mean
+ standard deviation (SD)
age was 65.2
+ 11.5 years (range 32 – 85 years). One hundred and
eighteen total joint arthroplasties were performed of which 63 were
total knees and 55 were total hips. The gender distribution of the
joint arthroplasties was 51 (81%) females in the total knee
arthroplasty group, and 39 (71%) females in the total hip
arthroplasty group. The diagnosis of the patients who underwent
total knee and hip arthroplasties were as follows: osteoarthritis
accounted for 104 arthroplasties; rheumatoid arthritis for nine
arthroplasties; systemic lupus erythematosis for three
arthroplasties and avascular necrosis for seven arthroplasties. Five
patients had more than one diagnosis. Average body mass index (or
BMI) for the 104 patients with available information was 28.9
kilograms per meters squared (kg/m2), ranging from17.9 to
68.3 kg/m2. The mean ± SD duration of surgery for all
joint arthroplasties was 226.1
+ 63.5 minutes (range 110 - 392
minutes). The mean ± SD duration of surgery for total knee arthroplasties was 225.9
+ 66.2 minutes (range 115 -392 minutes).
The mean
+ SD duration of surgery for total hip arthroplasties was
226.4
+ 60.9 minutes (range 110 - 360 minutes). The mean
+
SD preoperative hemoglobin was 12.0
+ 1.4 g/dl (range 7.3 - 15.6
g/dl). Seventy-five (64%) patients were transfused and of these
patients 44 patients received allogenic blood only; 20 patients were
transfused autologous blood only and eleven patients received both
allogenic and autologous blood. Thirty-six (30%) patients predonated
a total of 46 units of blood. Of the 75 patients who were
transfused, 33 (44%) donated autologous blood. A total of 144 units
of blood were transfused with 101 units being allogenic
transfusions. The number of units transfused was higher for the
total knee arthroplasty group (81 units), than for the total hip
arthroplasty group (63 units) (Fig. 1).
The overall blood transfusion rate was 63% (total knee arthroplasty 67%; total hip arthroplasty 60%). Number of units transfused per procedure was approximately 2:1. A total of 6 units of blood were unused (3 units of autologous blood and 3 units of allogenic blood). Table 1 shows the results of multivariable logistic regression to assess whether preoperative hemoglobin levels, age, gender, BMI, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, and type of anesthesia were predictive of risk for post-surgery transfusion. Predicted risk of post-surgery transfusion, generated based on the logistic regression model in Table 1, were plotted against preoperative hemoglobin levels (Fig. 2). A fitted linear regression line was super-imposed, showing a direct relationship between predicted risk of post-surgery transfusion and preoperative hemoglobin levels after adjusting for gender, age, BMI, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, and type of anesthesia.
Thirty-six patients donated blood, and 33 of these patients were transfused with autologous blood post-surgery. Table 2 summarizes the multivariable logistic regression when the 36 patients who donated blood were excluded. As done previously, predicted risk of post-surgery transfusion, generated based on the logistic regression model in Table 2, were plotted against preoperative hemoglobin levels (Fig. 3). The fitted linear regression line showed an inverse relationship between predicted risk of post-surgery transfusion and preoperative hemoglobin levels after adjusting for gender, age, BMI, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, and type of anesthesia.
Based on
t-tests for the comparison of means, average preoperative
hemoglobin values did not differ significantly between persons who
were or were not transfused post-surgery. That finding was
consistent within gender as well as when persons who donated
autologous blood were excluded. Among males who did not donate
autologous blood and then were later transfused, their mean
preoperative hemoglobin was 12.0 g/dl, compared to 11.6 g/dl among
their female counterparts (P-value = 0.575, not significant). Males
who did not donate autologous blood and were never transfused had an
average preoperative hemoglobin of 13.1 g/dl compared to 11.5 g/dl
for their female counterparts (P < 0.001, significant) (Tables 3, 4).
A patient’s risk of requiring a transfusion during surgery and in the immediate postoperative period is an important element of effective blood management. Estimated perioperative blood loss and preoperative hemoglobin concentration are critical predictors of the need for blood transfusion. In our study, the multivariate analysis showed a significant relationship only between postoperative transfusion and the estimated blood loss (p = 0.000). Table 1 revealed that persons were 28.9% more likely to need post-surgery transfusion given a 1g/dl increase in preoperative hemoglobin levels. However, this value was non-significant (95% confidence interval (CI) for the odds ratio: 0.865 – 1.921, p = 0.212). From Table 2, although the odds ratio for preoperative hemoglobin levels remained non-significant (95% CI: 0.413 – 1.463; p = 0.435), there is a reversal in the direction of its impact on the risk for post-surgery transfusion. Persons were now 22.3% less likely to need post-surgery transfusion given a 1g/dl increase in preoperative hemoglobin levels, after adjusting for gender, age, BMI, surgery duration, estimated blood loss during surgery and type of anesthesia used. These results are not consistent with the findings in the literature. Several studies have established a relationship between the preoperative hemoglobin level and the need for postoperative blood transfusion [3-5, 12]. The abnormal finding in our study can possibly be explained by the absence of hemoglobin levels immediately preoperative in some of the patients who predonated blood. These patients, after predonation, possibly had low preoperative hemoglobin levels. Thirty-three of 36 patients who predonated blood were transfused their autologous blood post-surgery. The results would be skewed since the analysis was performed using predonation hemoglobin levels rather than immediate preoperative hemoglobin levels in some of the patients who predonated blood. The multivariable analysis with the exclusion of the 36 patients who donated blood revealed that the preoperative hemoglobin levels remained non-significant but there was a reversal in the direction of its impact on the need for post-surgery transfusion. Salido et al [12] reported that patients with a preoperative hemoglobin level less that 13 g/dl had a four times greater risk of having a transfusion than did those with a hemoglobin level between 13 g/dl and 15 g/dl, and a 15.3 times greater risk than did those with a hemoglobin level of greater than 15 g/dl. Bierbaum et al [3] also reported that the rate of breakthrough transfusion was highest for their patients who had a baseline hemoglobin that was between 10 g/dl and 13 g/dl. Salido et al [12] and Bierbaum et al [3] found that the prevalence of blood transfusion after hip surgery was higher than that after knee surgery, although this difference was not significant. In our study, the blood transfusion rate was higher in knee surgery (67%) than hip surgery (60%). The average blood transfusion rates for total knee and hip arthroplasties in studies by Bierbaum et al [3], Feagan et al [13], and Pierson et al [4] were 49%, 27% and 2.1% respectively. Our transfusion rate was 63%. There was no standard protocol for proceeding with a transfusion in our study. Instead, the decision for blood transfusion was based on the patient’s overall clinical status and co-morbidities. Many authors advocate that postoperative transfusion trigger can be brought to 8 g/dl in a hemodynamically stable patient [5, 14, 15]. Bierbaum et al [3] confirmed in their study that allogenic blood was transfused despite extensive use of predonated autologous blood. Twenty percent (796) of the 3,920 patients who had a procedure on the hip and 13% (723) of the 5,552 who had a procedure on the knee had a transfusion of allogenic blood. The rates of transfusion of allogenic blood were highest for the patients who had a revision or a bilateral procedure and for those who had a baseline hemoglobin level of 13 g/dl or less. In our study, of the 75 patients who were transfused, 44 (59%) received allogenic blood. A total of 144 units of blood were transfused with 101 units being allogenic transfusions. The use of preoperative autologous blood donation has increased substantially although it has been associated with such risks as preoperative anaemia, ischemic events, and complications severe enough to require hospitalization [16, 17]. Furthermore, the magnitude and rate of patient response to compensatory erythropoiesis to replace donated red blood cells generally has been overestimated [18]. In one study [19], preoperative donation between 42 and seven days before surgery still resulted in an average decrease of 1g/dl for every unit of autologous blood donated, suggesting an absence of adequate compensatory erythropoiesis. Over collection of blood is also a problem associated with preoperative autologous donation. As much as 50% of autologous blood is unused in patients undergoing joint replacement [18]. Bierbaum et al [3] found that a high percentage of autologous blood was discarded, and many patients never received any of there predonated units. In our study, 36 (30%) of 118 patients predonated a total of 46 units of blood. Three units of autologous blood were unused. Two units were donated by one patient who had tested positive for HIV. One patient refused autologous transfusion. A major weakness
of this study is the small study population. The University Hospital
of the West Indies is a low volume centre for total hip and knee
arthroplasties. The high trauma burden on our operating lists, the
limited operating time and the great consumption of blood by trauma
patients are the main reasons for the small numbers in this paper.
Our results have shown that there is no relationship between age,
gender, BMI, duration of surgery, type of anesthesia and
preoperative hemoglobin level and the need for postoperative blood
transfusion. There was a significant relationship between the
estimated blood loss and the need for postoperative blood
transfusion. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. |
Guerra JJ, Cuckler JM.
Cost effectiveness of intraoperative autotransfusion in total hip
arthroplasty surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995315):212-222. [Medline] |
2. |
Woolson ST,
Watt JM. Use of autologous blood in total hip replacement. A
comprehensive program. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991;73(1):76-80. [Medline] |
3. |
Bierbaum BE,
Callaghan JJ, Galante JO, Rubash HE, Tooms RE, Welch RB. An analysis of
blood management in patients having a total hip or knee arthroplasty. J
Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81(1):2-10. [Medline] |
4. |
Pierson JL, Hannon TJ,
Earles DR. A blood-conservation algorithm to reduce blood transfusions
after total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am
2004;86-A(7):1512-1518. [Medline] |
5. |
Prasad N, Padmanabhan
V, Mullaji A. Blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of risk
factors. Int Orthop 2007;31(1):39-44. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
6. | Cone J, Day LJ, Johnson GK, Murray DG, Nelson CL. Blood products: optimal use, conservation, and safety. Instr Course Lect 1990;39(431-434.[Medline] |
7. |
Stevens CE, Aach RD,
Hollinger FB, Mosley JW, Szmuness W, Kahn R, Werch J, et al. Hepatitis B
virus antibody in blood donors and the occurrence of non-A, non-B
hepatitis in transfusion recipients. An analysis of the
Transfusion-Transmitted Viruses Study. Ann Intern Med
1984;101(6):733-738. [Medline] |
8. |
Brunson ME, Alexander
JW. Mechanisms of transfusion-induced immunosuppression. Transfusion
1990;30(7):651-658. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
9. |
Ness PM, Bourke DL,
Walsh PC. A randomized trial of perioperative hemodilution versus
transfusion of preoperatively deposited autologous blood in elective
surgery.
Transfusion 1992;32(3):226-230. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
10. |
Semkiw LB, Schurman
DJ, Goodman SB, Woolson ST. Postoperative blood salvage using the Cell
Saver after total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am
1989;71(6):823-827. [Medline] |
11. |
Roye DP, Jr.
Recombinant human erythropoietin and blood management in pediatric spine
surgery. Orthopedics 1999;22(1 Suppl):s158-160. [Medline] |
12. |
Salido JA, Marin LA,
Gomez LA, Zorrilla P, Martinez C. Preoperative hemoglobin levels and the
need for transfusion after prosthetic hip and knee surgery: analysis of
predictive factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A(2):216-220. [Medline] |
13. |
Feagan BG, Wong CJ,
Johnston WC, Arellano R, Colterjohn N, Karkouti K, Turner K. Transfusion
practices for elective orthopedic surgery. CMAJ 2002;166(3):310-314. [Medline] |
14. |
Carson JL, Duff A,
Poses RM, Berlin JA, Spence RK, Trout R, Noveck H, et al. Effect of
anaemia and cardiovascular disease on surgical mortality and morbidity.
Lancet 1996;348(9034):1055-1060. [Medline] |
15. |
Keating EM. Current
options and approaches for blood management in orthopaedic surgery.
Instr Course Lect 1999;48(655-665. [Medline] |
16. |
Popovsky MA, Whitaker
B, Arnold NL. Severe outcomes of allogeneic and autologous blood
donation: frequency and characterization.
Transfusion
1995;35(9):734-737. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
17. |
Goodnough LT, Monk TG.
Evolving concepts in autologous blood procurement and transfusion: case
reports of perisurgical anemia complicated by myocardial infarction. Am
J Med 1996;101(2A):33S-37S. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
18. |
Goodnough LT, Brecher
ME, Kanter MH, AuBuchon JP. Transfusion medicine. Second of two
parts--blood conservation. N Engl J Med 1999;340(7):525-533. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
19. |
Kanter MH, van Maanen
D, Anders KH, Castro F, Mya WW, Clark K. Preoperative autologous blood
donations before elective hysterectomy. JAMA 1996;276(10):798-801. [CrossRef] |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):10.4021/jocmr2009.12.1279
About
DOI and
CrossRef
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research is a member of CrossRef.