Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Review

Volume 8, Number 3, March 2016, pages 181-189


Current Chemotherapy and Potential New Targets in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

Table

Table 1. Therapeutic Agents, Objective Response, Partial Response, and Complete Response Rates
 
Therapeutic agentPatients, NOR rate, N, %PR rate, N, %CR rate, N, %Reference
OR rate: objective response rate; PR rate: partial response rate; CR rate: complete response rate.
Doxorubicin41(28 evaluable)7/28, 25%NANAOmura et al [15]
Bevacizumab + doxorubicin72/7, 28%2/7, 28%0/7, 0%D’Adamo et al [16]
Doxorubicin + dimethyl-triazeno-imidazole-carboxamide (DTIC)31(20 evaluable)6/20, 30%NANAOmura et al [15]
Trabectedin31/3, 33%1/3, 33%0/5, 0%Amant et al [22]
Trabectedin52NA11/52, 21%NAGrosso et al [21]
Gemcitabine429/42, 21%8/42, 19%1/42, 2%Look et al [9]
Gemcitabine + docetaxel23Not reached after 49 monthsNANAHensley et al [10]
Gemcitabine +docetaxel (first line)42 (39 evaluable)15/39, 38%13/39, 33%2/39, 5%Hensley et al [11]
Gemcitabine + docetaxel (second line)4813/48, 27%10/48, 20%3/48, 6%Hensley et al [12]
Ifosfamide + doxorubicin3310/33, 30%9/33, 27%1/33, 3%Sutton et al [18]
Mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin358/35, 22%5/35, 14%3/35, 8%Edmonson et al [13]
Sunitinib232/23, 8%2/23, 8%0/23, 0%Hensley et al [20]
Thalidomide290/29, 0%0/29, 0%0/29, 0%McMeekin et al [19]
Topotecan364/36, 11%3/36, 8.4%1/36, 2.7%Miller et al [14]