Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 7, Number 4, April 2015, pages 211-219


Efficacy and Safety of Sitagliptin in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Tables

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Study Subjects (n = 3,201)
 
Baseline parameters
Data are mean ± SD or number or % of subjects.
Age (years) (n = 3,201)65.0 ± 11.4
Gender (male/female) (n = 3,198)1,911/1,287
Body mass index (kg/m2) (n = 2,845)25.1 ± 4.3
Estimated duration of diabetes (years) (n = 2,914)9.56 ± 7.58
HbA1c (NGSP) (%) (n = 3,132)7.44 ± 1.20
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m2) (n = 2,702)69.2 ± 47.6
Glucose lowering agents (%)
  Sulfonylurea59.40%
  Glinide2.20%
  α-glucosidase inhibitor13.80%
  Thiazolidinedione23.40%
  Metformin45.50%
  Insulin therapy8.80%

 

Table 2. Changes in Clinical Parameters After Sitagliptin Treatment (n = 3,201)
 
BaselineAt 1 monthAt 3 monthsAt 6 monthsP value*
Data are mean ± SD or number of subjects. *Changes in clinical parameters after sitagliptin treatment were evaluated by analysis of variance using mixed effects model. **Comparison between baseline value and each value at 1, 3 and 6 months, by Student’s t-test. P < 0.05. NGSP: National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program.
Body mass index (kg/m2)25.1 ± 4.325.2 ± 4.325.2 ± 4.325.6 ± 4.3NS
  n2,8451,9372,0261,512
HbA1c (NGSP) (%)7.44 ± 1.207.07 ± 1.03**6.75 ± 0.92**6.73 ± 0.99**< 0.0001
  n3,1322,8482,9592,946
Random blood glucose level (mmo/L)9.69 ± 3.568.42 ± 2.88**8.32 ± 2.78**8.47 ± 2.91**< 0.0001
  n3,1022,8582,9462,923

 

Table 3. Predictive Value of Baseline Clinical Parameters for HbA1c Reduction by Sitagliptin Using Linear Mixed Effect Model (Type III Tests of Fixed Effects) (n = 3,201)
 
EffectNumerator of degree of freedomDenominator of degree of freedomF valuePr > F
Age (< 65 vs. ≥ 65), gender (male vs. female), duration of type 2 diabetes (< 10 years vs. ≥ 10 years), BMI (< 25 vs. ≥ 25), HbA1c levels (6, vs. 6 - 6.9 vs. 7.0 - 7.9 vs. ≥ 8), eGFR (60, vs. ≥ 60) and type of anti-diabetes drugs (sitagliptin monotherapy vs. sitagliptin plus SU vs. sitagliptin plus OHA and/or insulin without SU) were entered as covariate. eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; NGSP: National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program.
Treatment period38,076839.64< 0.001
Treatment period × body mass index (kg/m2)38,0760.910.4330
Age (years)13,0719.290.0023
Gender (female/male)13,0710.070.7871
Body mass index (kg/m2)13,0714.440.0353
Estimated duration of diabetes (years)13,0712.420.1202
Baseline HbA1c levels (%) (NGSP)33,0711,512.15< 0.001
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)13,0711.940.1640
Type of diabetes drugs23,0717.900.0004

 

Table 4. Clinical and Laboratory Safety and Tolerability Results (n = 3,201)
 
Number of patients with clinical adverse effectsNumber of patients who discontinued due to adverse effects
*Data are number of subjects (%).
Hypoglycemia82 (2.5%)4
Constipation29 (0.90%)7
Dizziness25 (0.77%)4
Eruption24 (0.74%)10
Edema20 (0.62%)1
Liver dysfunction19 (0.59%)5
Abdominal distension18 (0.56%)4
Diarrhea10 (0.31%)2
Abdominal pain8 (0.25%)1
Nausea and vomiting7 (0.22%)1
Appetite loss3 (0.09%)0
Others78 (2.4%)14
Total323 (10.1%)53

 

Table 5. Predictors of Hypoglycemia by Multiple Logistic Regression (n = 3,201)
 
Variables at baselineOdds ratio (Wald 95% confidence interval)
NGSP: National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program.
Type of anti-diabetes drugs
  Sitagliptin plus SU vs. sitagliptin monotherapy16.25 (7.633 - 34.61)
  Sitagliptin plus OHA and/or insulin without SU vs. sitagliptin monotherapy6.23 (2.75 - 14.36)
  Female vs. male1.47 (1.17 - 1.85)
  Body mass index (< 25 vs. ≥ 25)1.95 (1.52 - 2.50)
  Estimated duration of diabetes (years) (≥ 10 vs. < 10)1.28 (1.02 - 1.62)
Baseline HbA1c level (%) (NGSP)
  < 6 vs. ≥ 80.35 (0.13 - 0.96)
  6.0 - 6.9 vs. ≥ 81.17 (0.87 - 1.58)
  7.0 - 7.9 vs. ≥ 81.14 (0.85 - 1.52)